military (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message

mcfreak -> military (5/22/2007 9:46:49 AM)

iight so this is watsup?
ive been trying to think of a way to continue my dom ideas but keep them on the DL enought so that the military doesnt know since  i could be charged and thrown into the brig...and advice yall



earthycouple -> RE: military (5/22/2007 10:42:56 AM)

and the smartest way to do that is to toss your picture up for everyone to see...

*sniff*  smells a troll



IrishMist -> RE: military (5/22/2007 10:45:20 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: earthycouple

and the smartest way to do that is to toss your picture up for everyone to see...

*sniff*  smells a troll

/snickers

they never fail to amaze me either



Majik -> RE: military (5/22/2007 10:50:20 AM)

I work on base and you would not believe the amount of Doms and subs that come into my shop. For the most part none of them make a stink about who/what they are...but then again they don't shout it from the rafters.

I've found that if you don't push it in anyones face the military for the most part will leave you alone.



Faramir -> RE: military (5/22/2007 11:01:14 AM)

I'm pretty sure being kinky isn't against the UCMJ per se, and you will not be charged under art. 134 unless you are fucking something else up, and someone wants to stick it to you.  I think you run a risk of being charged under art's. 120, 125 or 128 if someone complains about you, ie a former sub or partner shows up at PMO and says "Cpl So and So tied me up, raped my ass and whipped me."  But that's not specific to the military--civilians run the same risk.

If you are a senior NCO or a commissioned officer, being "out" may court social opprobrium that hurts your career, comes out subtly on your OER (or whatever the fuck your service use, just guessing Army).  Since you got a clear face pick here, and they style in which you write, I'm guessing you are a non-rate, in which case, no one gives a fuck about your sex life.

Just don't beat/tie up/force-play someone who might possibly complain about you.



jauntyone -> RE: military (5/22/2007 11:01:46 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Majik

I work on base and you would not believe the amount of Doms and subs that come into my shop. For the most part none of them make a stink about who/what they are...but then again they don't shout it from the rafters.

I've found that if you don't push it in anyones face the military for the most part will leave you alone.


Greetings
 
I agree with this here. Master and I are both in the military, and while we do not hide our relationship, neither do we flaunt it.
 
I wish you well
 
melissa



slavegirljoy -> RE: military (5/22/2007 1:27:08 PM)

It shouldn't be a problem.  Just make sure you keep it CONSENSUAL and be DISCREET about your sexual activities.  Make sure that limits are respected at all times.
 
i was in the army for 12 years & my husband retired as a Command Sergeant Major with over 30 years in the army.  No one ever asked us about our sexual activities.  We were swingers, a D/s couple & enjoyed a lot of BDSM activities.  When in uniform, we were professional soldiers and when we were off duty & in private settings we were as kinky as we wanted to be. 
 
Have fun, but be smart.  Main advice, stay away from the married ladies, especially if her husband outranks you.  That can get you into a lot of trouble.
 
"Discretion is the better part of valor."

slave joy
Owned property of Master David



ExSteelAgain -> RE: military (5/22/2007 2:15:05 PM)

Faramir, he is a Marine. To the OP, it is not a good idea to post your pic, especially if you write a post saying you are military and then posting a pic with a wearing a sweatshirt identifying you as being in the military. That, in itself, probably violates the UCMJ. Think.



ExSteelAgain -> RE: military (5/22/2007 2:18:29 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: jauntyone

Greetings
 
I agree with this here. Master and I are both in the military, and while we do not hide our relationship, neither do we flaunt it.
 
I wish you well
 
melissa


You and your Master are great people from what I've seen on CM. I'll throw this out for what it's worth to you. There may come a time in your military career when security clearances and so on are important. Be careful with your pics...nice as they are.



jauntyone -> RE: military (5/22/2007 2:23:25 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ExSteelAgain

Faramir, he is a Marine. To the OP, it is not a good idea to post your pic, especially if you write a post saying you are military and then posting a pic with a wearing a sweatshirt identifying you as being in the military. That, in itself, probably violates the UCMJ. Think.

Greetings
 
I mean no offense, but both Master and I are in the Marines. All the OP has to understand is that there is a time and a place for everything ( I am assuming that he is only referring to 'play' and not the actual dynamics within a relationship )
 
I wish you well
 
melissa
 
edited to add:
I just saw your other response. I want to add that Master and I do not partake of the BDSM play aspects. Ours is strictly a M/s based dynamic. Several of our commanding officers know of the relationship that we share simply because they have honored us with their presence at our house. I do not fear others knowing; I do not however flaunt it in their faces [:)] ( I should change this to 'we', as in Master and I )
 
And thank you for you kind words
 
I wish you well on this beautiful day



ExSteelAgain -> RE: military (5/22/2007 2:26:19 PM)

Ooooookkkkkaaaayyyy, but I know what I speak of. You folks be careful.



Faramir -> RE: military (5/22/2007 3:28:49 PM)

Ok, so he's a Devil Dog.  If he is E4 or lower, he gets Pro/Con marks--what, he's going to get dinged on Con because he likes to spank his girly?  If he's an E5 or higher, what, the RS if going to make a comment in his section "C" about being kinky?  In 15 years I never heard of anyone heterosexual in 2d MARDIV or 4th FSSG ever getting taken up on a sodomy charge.  It's just not an issue.

As for the picture, anyone can wear a USMC t-shirt.  The rule is against wearing your uniform in a way that is prohibited:

quote:

  
11002.  DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE DIRECTIVES PERTAINING TO UNIFORMS

1.  Implementing 10 U.S.C. 772, the President, by Executive Order 10554 of 18 August 1954, delegated to the Secretary of Defense the authority to prescribe regulations under which persons may wear the uniform.  The following excerpts from DoD Directive 1334.1 of 11 August 1969 outline these regulations:


a.  Members of the Armed Forces (including retired members and members of reserve components).  The wearing of the uniform is prohibited under any of the following circumstances:




(1) At any meeting or demonstration which is a function of, or sponsored by an organization, association, movement, group, or combination of persons which the Attorney General of the United States has designated, pursuant to E.O. 10450, as amended as totalitarian, fascist, communist, or subversive, or as having adopted a policy of advocating or approving the commission of acts of force or violence to deny others their rights under The Constitution of the United States, or as seeking to alter the form of Government of the United States by unconstitutional means.

(2) During or in connection with the furtherance of political activities, private employment or commercial interests, when an inference of official sponsorship for the activity or interest could be drawn.

(3) Except when authorized by competent Service authority, when participating in activities such as public speeches, interviews, picket lines, marches, rallies or any public demonstration (including those pertaining to civil rights), which may imply Service sanction of the cause for which the demonstration or activity is conducted.

(4) When wearing of the uniform would tend to bring discredit upon the Armed Forces.

(5) When specifically prohibited by regulations of the department concerned.



ExSteelAgain -> RE: military (5/22/2007 3:41:19 PM)

Faramir, I will defer to you since you are active duty and I'm retired working for DOD. Just keep in mind, that you don't have your pic up as I don't.. These folks may someday want to become  officers or something else, just as you are and I was. I still say it is unwise to post your pic.



LightHeartedMaam -> RE: military (5/22/2007 4:12:43 PM)

ahhhhh~  don't you think you should be focused on your military service? After all, there IS a war on.

(edited because I just saw he is only 19.  This explains it)



Faramir -> RE: military (5/22/2007 4:26:21 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ExSteelAgain

Faramir, I will defer to you since you are active duty and I'm retired working for DOD. Just keep in mind, that you don't have your pic up as I don't.. These folks may someday want to become  officers or something else, just as you are and I was. I still say it is unwise to post your pic.


I got out in 2003.



Noah -> RE: military (5/22/2007 7:40:06 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mcfreak

iight so this is watsup?
ive been trying to think of a way to continue my dom ideas but keep them on the DL enought so that the military doesnt know since  i could be charged and thrown into the brig...and advice yall


What is rank but officially sanctioned dominance? Go get some more, iight?



Masque66 -> RE: military (5/22/2007 8:29:27 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Noah
What is rank but officially sanctioned dominance? Go get some more, iight?



Hm..never thought of it that way.  So what do we call the whips and ropes branch of the military?



NControlofU -> RE: military (5/22/2007 8:45:56 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Masque66

quote:

ORIGINAL: Noah
What is rank but officially sanctioned dominance? Go get some more, iight?



Hm..never thought of it that way.  So what do we call the whips and ropes branch of the military?


I believe that would be the Intelligence Branch!



Noah -> RE: military (5/22/2007 8:53:02 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Masque66

quote:

ORIGINAL: Noah
What is rank but officially sanctioned dominance? Go get some more, iight?



Hm..never thought of it that way.  So what do we call the whips and ropes branch of the military?


If you can't envision dominance without whips or ropes, we're busy having two unrelated conversations. How many subs do you have who will kill strangers on your command?

In answer to your question: we might call it easier to recruit for. I'm not sure.

Seriously, can any reasonably thorough account of the military be given without mentioning that it is--whatever else it may be--a huge Switchopotamia D/s trip?

Of course there is one rank that can be seen as pure sub, but I was raised better than to talk about your Privates in public.

And for the US military it is also Humilipalooza when you consider who the service people are bound to obey as Commander in Chief these days.





slavegirljoy -> RE: military (5/22/2007 9:00:36 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Noah

And for the US military it is also Humilipalooza when you consider who the service people are bound to obey as Commander in Chief these days.

 
Actually, the worst "Humilipalooza" for me, as a soldier, was having to serve under Jimmy Carter.  What a loser.  Luckily, for us professional soldiers, The Gipper came along and saved us and restored our dignity and pride, plus he gave us a huge pay raise that got most of our enlisted men & women above the poverty level.
 
slave joy
Owned property of Master David



Page: [1] 2   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125