Satyr6406
Posts: 820
Joined: 3/27/2006 From: New Brunswick, N.J. Status: offline
|
Wow! What's kind of funny is that I have never had a "type". I consider myself to be a "womanizer". I need to define that one. To me, almost all ladies are beautiful, in some way. I can appreciate a lady's ability to sing. But, I also appreciate a lady that can't sing but, still has fun just "belting one out", at karaoke. I can appreciate an "airhead" as long as there's some common sense. I appreciate intelligence. It is very rare that I find a lady to be completely unattractive. Now, to the part about why I put the word "womanizer" in quotation marks: I don't "use" women in the negative connotation of the word. I am up-front and honest about my relationship status (with all parties, involved) and even if the "relationship" turns out to NOT be a long-term thing, I like to think that I contribute something to her experience. So, when it comes to attraction, there are so many that 'work" for me that I cannot, in all good conscience, claim to have a specific influence other than my impressions and observations of that, particular, individual. Peace and comfort, Michael
_____________________________
Peace and comfort, Michael Former Vice-President Gore didn't invent the internet but, he DID make up global warming!
|