LadyEllen
Posts: 10931
Joined: 6/30/2006 From: Stourport-England Status: offline
|
Balls are at the heart of the problem, being a requirement for engaging in the activity in the first place, and part of the motivation behind it. I see it at an extension of a fetishistic approach to woman; for some the artifacts and apparel is sufficient, for others the artifacts become personal accessories and the apparel is adopted on a temporary basis, thereby acquiring the woman by association. The same process I'd say is at work in the pretence of womanhood adopted online, and in the particular instance mentioned, of attempted impersonation over the phone. Passing onesself off as a woman successfully, confirms acquisition of the woman in that she is thereby affirmed by others as genuine. The success in impersonation happens also to hurt those accepting the impersonation. The problem for such impersonators though, quite aside from their male voices (which can be trained with reasonable success to produce a passable female voice) is that of intonation, speech patterns and vocabulary choice; all of which are giveaways for others. It is a high risk strategy for impersonators to speak, yet the whole pattern of their behaviour is equally high risk, with correspondingly high personal rewards for success, in that their fetishistic relationship with woman is strengthened thereby. It does require balls to test one's fetishistic access to woman at ever higher levels against the impressions of others - failure means the destruction of that access by way of the breaking of the illusion that the woman is real, to the impersonator himself; his relationship with her, which may have taken years to develop, is over, with corresponding hurt to him as much as if she had been real. The message from that then to those who see such impersonation as the natural progression of their fetish, is to be careful, for given my analysis is true, then it is just as harmful to the impersonator when he is discovered - as he will be at some stage, as it is hurtful to those discovering. Far better to be upfront - but then the reason for secrecy is likely the shame felt by such men, arising from the ridicule of others for their particular fetish. E
_____________________________
In a test against the leading brand, 9 out of 10 participants couldnt tell the difference. Dumbasses.
|