Sinergy
Posts: 9383
Joined: 4/26/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: kiyari As I understand this, they are letting go of those SALES PERSONNEL who have [through being Good at being Sales Persons] risen to making higher wages... and will be hiring in their place persons who will work for lesser pay. Were I a business owner of any business dependent in any sizeable manner upon sales... well, this would be just moronic in context. Can we say "DUH"? Those kiddies standing around chatting and ignoring you... prolly will stay In a sense it is a big "DUH" In a more machiavellian sense, it makes perfect sense. Let us take a hypothetical. We have Corporation X who has 5 million dollars to budget for salary. Their CEOs make 2 million each (2 of them) and their sales staff of 500 people get to split the other million. If they have, by dint of hard work and success, started making more than $20,000 a year, the only solution available to the 2 CEOs is to get rid of some of them, or pay them less money. But if you have 50 stores, it is not really possible to sell anything with less than 10 people per store, since those stupid labor laws (that liberals put in place) insist on things like an 8 hour day, breaks, benefits, etc. So the only solution is to convince your (non-unionized) employees to do the same work for less money. Clear as mud? Sinergy
_____________________________
"There is a fine line between clever and stupid" David St. Hubbins "This Is Spinal Tap" "Every so often you let a word or phrase out and you want to catch it and bring it back. You cant do that, it is gone, gone forever." J. Danforth Quayle
|