meesekite
Posts: 53
Joined: 9/8/2005 Status: offline
|
Hi all... I was on Mr. Marcus's site. I was in a BDSM relationship with him from 2003 til 2006. He had consent for those photographs, and they were not taken against her will, no matter what she claimed or the jury believed. I know this from having known him, from speaking with her on a few occassions, and from hearing him speak to her. Lets say though that years later she did regret doing posing, as she apparently did. Regret over a past act doesnt mean there was non consent for that act. Thats like someone modeling for Playboy, changing their mind, and then insisting that all copies be destroyed. It doesnt happen that way. He had model release forms we all signed. (I know, as I signed one as I was on the site myself). He had every legal right to use those pictures. Taking them down would have been very detrimental for the site (I feel), and as he had every legal right to use them, he made a choice to do so. Not taking the pictures down at her request doesnt indicate a lack of respect on his part. And if you believe it does, well, a lack of respect isnt illegal. As for risking future BDSM relations, I dont see how that does so. People should take responsibility for what they do. As for the plea bargain, I dont understand where you see stupidity there. Why should Mr. Marcus have confessed to a wrong he did not commit; a crime he did not do? HE knew he was innocent, and had he plead guilty in a plea deal he would have most definately been a convicted felon. Going to trial at least gave him a chance of exoneration/ acquittal. I feel it is not stupid to stand for ones rights, ideals, and principles, and by NOT taking the plea, I feel Mr. Marcus was doing just that..maintaining his innocenece, and not willing to compromise the high standards I feel he believes in. Sincerely, meesekite
|