Mercnbeth
Posts: 11766
Status: offline
|
quote:
In my mind, a slave is a much deeper and more spiritual role than a submissive. For a slave, your Dominant is the main focus of your entire life. With all the people I know in the local BDSM scene, there are only two couples I actually consider to be engaging in 24/7/365 Master/slave relationship. You have to witness the difference to truly understand it, I feel. This does not mean I feel that slaves are superior to submissives. Each has a valuable place. I'm in agreement with Beach's quote and add another aspect to it. The implication of a submissive identity to me is that they are interested in submitting to sensation which may or may not include an element of dominance. The idea of surrendering in total or outside the boundaries of limits is not a goal. However, that would be my distinction assumed by just the self imposed label. Then again, I have the opinion that it is impossible to be a "slave" without a owner, or a "Master" without a slave; therefore all singles seeking would only be Dom or sub. Then, again, again, what's the importance of any self label beyond the simple Top/bottom until getting to the point of a relationship where the relationship defines the roles? Most important though is the high-lighted line of Beach's quote; "Each has a valuable place." My experience was built through contact with people, with varying degrees of submission and intensity and varying focus on physical and mental aspects. This again gets into semantics, but pragmatically a profile should give the activities of interest or experience, and give the insight of the person's goal being that of submissive, slave, dom, Master, switch. Alone, these represent personality traits. The actual and agreed interaction with another person or persons even if the relationship is casual provides and gives meaning.
|