myobedience -> profile pictures and definate prejudice (3/11/2007 1:32:34 PM)
OK here is my rant... I had supplied some really cool effect pictures, nothing more than a pic taken in a mirror, and some pictures of me (my wrists) in bondage and every time they were NOT appropriate.
I was browsing photos just now and I cannot believe what is considered acceptable and yet mine were not.
I have seen other comments on profiles from others with this same view point...
What the H E double hockey sticks does this prejudical and bias stuff happen?
The T.O.S.'s are pretty clear, but.......... it does appear when you surf the other side that many are getting to use stuff that I know I've not been able to. The one's that get me are the blantant no face shots that are required! Grrrrrrrrrrrr then again I quit posting pics. all it does is draw wankers.
It seems that the picture climate is changing a bit when browing the photos. Maybe the internal guidelines have changed just a small bit and you should resubmit if it's been a while? I haven't seen a big difference but I have seen one. Just my opinion of course.
Because every moderator is different who approves profiles. What one may consider out of bounds the other does not.
Yes and no. Actually, no and yes.
No, mods have nothing to do with profile/photo reviewing. Yes, when you have a bunch of different people working as reviewers, it's hardly shocking to find that people might interpret things differently. Humans are like that.