RE: Der Spiegel: 5 troops/day deserting or AWOL. (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


FangsNfeet -> RE: Der Spiegel: 5 troops/day deserting or AWOL. (3/3/2007 11:16:20 PM)

xBullx

I agree that economics  plays a role for many who decide to enlist or not enlist. I graduated with one guy who didn't get on the bus after getting the call about his full scholarship.

In Huntsville, TX, many college drop outs find themselves either joining the military or becoming a prison guard. Both openings are in demand with no work experience required.

For those who enlist for the G.I. Bill, I keep suggesting ROTC. Get your education first and then pay for it with service later.

Either way, the poor are known to go where the money is. Everyone has a price. You can make a man walk bare foot in hell if you bribe him enough. Financial stress causes people to take jobs or careers they really don't want. The need and temptation can be to much to bare based on who and what you have to take care of. 

However, if you can tough it out. People can resist becoming a guard or a soldier. It's all mental and following your heart. 





xBullx -> RE: Der Spiegel: 5 troops/day deserting or AWOL. (3/4/2007 5:28:52 AM)

FangsNFeet,

I agree there are other routes, but us humans and our paths of least resistance.[;)]

Bull




Real0ne -> RE: Der Spiegel: 5 troops/day deserting or AWOL. (3/14/2007 8:09:59 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: xBullx
Sure, I only have a conspiracy therory, but chew on that for awhile. Maybe there is a gun to their head, one a girl from your side of the tracks might have not considered. It may be crazy to think that someone planned this crap, but hey, some think Bush planned the planes. Some think FDR new about the Harbor. Some think Elvis lives in my basement. Wait that was the guy that lived there before me.

Living well,

Bull


as far as fdr is concerned, the attack date was in the headlines in the newpapers for a week prior so we can excuse him since his poor reading skills and everyone else in the gov took them 2 weeks to read it.  i am sure the creation of a few new cia's and nsa's and shitloads more money would have resolved that issue and they could have nipped it in the butt before it actually happened.




meatcleaver -> RE: Der Spiegel: 5 troops/day deserting or AWOL. (3/14/2007 8:18:54 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: caitlyn

If you volunteer, you are honor bound to see it through.
 
I don't think we should jail these people. I think they should have good confiscated to pay for all the training and pay they received, and immediately kicked out of the country in whatever direction they choose to go.


I would go with the honour thing if the military were used in a honourable way but they aren't. I think the fact that a President ( or Prime Minister for that matter) can start a war on a lie and for lining the pockets of his cronies (following the money), one is released from a contract bound in honour because there is no honour on the other side.




Aubre -> RE: Der Spiegel: 5 troops/day deserting or AWOL. (3/14/2007 11:09:32 AM)

Actually these numbers aren't that much different from peacetime believe it or not. When I was in the Navy guys used to go UA (Navy/Marine version of AWOL, stands for Unauthroized Absence) every now and then, come back and take their punishment.




Sternhand4 -> RE: Der Spiegel: 5 troops/day deserting or AWOL. (3/14/2007 11:11:19 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver

quote:

ORIGINAL: caitlyn

If you volunteer, you are honor bound to see it through.
 
I don't think we should jail these people. I think they should have good confiscated to pay for all the training and pay they received, and immediately kicked out of the country in whatever direction they choose to go.


I would go with the honour thing if the military were used in a honourable way but they aren't. I think the fact that a President ( or Prime Minister for that matter) can start a war on a lie and for lining the pockets of his cronies (following the money), one is released from a contract bound in honour because there is no honour on the other side.

Whats the english version of leavenworth?




meatcleaver -> RE: Der Spiegel: 5 troops/day deserting or AWOL. (3/14/2007 12:28:41 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sternhand4

Whats the english version of leavenworth?



If I understand you right, 'the glasshouse'




Termyn8or -> RE: Der Spiegel: 5 troops/day deserting or AWOL. (3/14/2007 12:39:54 PM)

I could never serve these people.

Remember a movie called Black Rain ? The Japanese drug kingpin said he wouldn't be satisfied until every child in the US was a heroin addict. Why ?

Why can we nuke Japan but not Germany ?

Money. Germany had an infrastructure we could exploit, Japan did not.

Eddie at work had a question the other day which was one of those "Why do they do that ?" type of questions about the government. I said "They want it that way". I told him I couldn't answer fully, we would have to go out for a beer or something, or better yet to my house where I can show him evidence of why, and actually they want things the way they are.

RealOne, I don't want to hijack, but I was unaware of a newspaper warning of the Pearl Harbor attack. IIRC evidence of FDR's complicity is indicated by documents found with the FOIA. There is supposed to be a memo from intelligence, but he might not have believed it, so complicity is not proven.

However there is another document that came right after that, but still before the attack, orders to dismantle some of the most expensive equipment at the base and remove it. I can't say for sure that FDR signed it, but the Commander In Chief should know something like that. Nonetheless, the Commander In Chief is responsible.

If you have evidence of this newspaper article, can you give us a link ? I would very much like to see it.

Back to the subject, I would suggest that any young person considering going into the military should visit a VA hospital. They say a picture is worth a thousand words, but if you get a thousand words from someone who has actually been there, I think it's worth a "look".

I have not been to war, and to those who have - thank you for putting your ass on the line for me. Whether you were doing it for our country or not, you thought you were. That is what counts.

If you want to join the military now, after a battery of psychological screens of course (lol), do it because you want to help the troops. You go to Iraq you are not helping the country, you are helping the rich get richer, but there can be one good reason.

Our troops are getting spread pretty thin, they are outnumbered and targets all the time. Some may actually feel a responsibility to go and help our troops.

And please, don't enough people ever enlist to get the neocons cocksure about invading Iran. Holy shit, does anyone even have a grasp on this ? (RealOne, judge for yourself whether to respond here or start a thread).

If we invade Iran, lemme clue you in on a few things. Most Arab countries are held by force. You see the ones not getting bombed ? Notice also that we have military bases there. Why ? To help the government that "we" support stay in power. Right now the possible insurgents in these countries don't have it bad enough to act up. But world events could inflame their tempers, and we could have problems. We are talking about governments "we" support that are going to have problems controlling insurgencies. That means our troops will have to go and help them as well.

Some of these sects, Sunni, Shiite etc., even in different countries have not only been displaced in history from time to time, some of them hold a fierce, family like loyalty to others in their group, even in other countries.

Mark my words, this situation is alot more dangerous than these fuckheads in government think it is.

Add to that the fact that we are cast in an ever darker light by two potential big problems. Russia and China. China could cripple our economy with the stroke of a pen. I hear Russia's army isn't that great but they got some gnarly weapons. Russia will probably stay out of it if at all possible, but I don't think we can beat them on their own soil, and don't count on them as a ally.

As things progress, all this money is borrowed, and China might decide those Tbills aren't so good anymore. The stroke of the pen might not be a punitive act at all, but they have to act in the best interest of their own economy. It may be a matter of losing faith before losing face.

In light of all this, they still have to have Iran no matter how much shit hits the fan. Ever play the game Risk ? It's a map, you get armies you move here and there and the idea is to take over the world. I think the neocons think that the world is a big game of risk.

Have your youngsters visit that VA hospital.

T




Sinergy -> RE: Der Spiegel: 5 troops/day deserting or AWOL. (3/14/2007 1:58:12 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver

quote:

ORIGINAL: caitlyn

If you volunteer, you are honor bound to see it through.
 
I don't think we should jail these people. I think they should have good confiscated to pay for all the training and pay they received, and immediately kicked out of the country in whatever direction they choose to go.


I would go with the honour thing if the military were used in a honourable way but they aren't. I think the fact that a President ( or Prime Minister for that matter) can start a war on a lie and for lining the pockets of his cronies (following the money), one is released from a contract bound in honour because there is no honour on the other side.


I think it is more than that, meatcleaver.  The contract the enlistee signs states they will do X and Y and Z, they can only be held (as a reservist) on post for some specific time interval.  They are provided with certain benefits, pay, etc.  There is a limit to how long they can be forced to serve; i.e. their contract ends.

Then there is fine print at the bottom which states that in case there is a war, all bets are off.

Bush et al invaded a sovereign country without a formal declaration of war by Congress.  Then proceeded to violate each and every contractual agreement we have with both our enlisted full-time soldiers and our reservists, based on the (incorrect, untrue, false) idea that the United States is at war.

During the Vietnam War, our government at least kept their agreements with the soldiers and mandated that they could only be kept in country for 365 days and then must be sent back home.

I imagine the response that during the Vietnam War there was a draft will be forthcoming, but I still think that misses the point about the current situation. 

1) Had the Bush administration read the study provided to them by the outgoing Clinton administration, they would have learned that Clinton et al, predicted exactly what ended up happening years prior to Bush being elected.

2) Had the Bush administration considered what would happen when they defeated Saddam's army and disbanded his military and police forces, considering this army is what kept the citizens from each other's throats, he might have realized that the US lacks the resources to rebuild Iraq.

2a)  Had the Bush administration considered what would happen if we became embroiled in an unwinnable quagmire, without a draft (read: ready supply of cannon fodder) he might have realized it would not work to invade.

3)  Had the Bush administration taken a bit more time getting international support, he would not have been stuck having to foot the entire bill for the whole fiasco.

4)  Had the Bush administration bothered to treat our military honorably, I might be willing to play the "honor" card suggesting they lack morals and ethics and honor for not keeping their agreements.  It is like raising children; they learn their morals and ethics (or lack thereof) from their caregivers.

5)  I am not sure Bush and Cheney even started the war to line his own pockets.  I believe they started the war because they thought it would be easy to do, and would put the US in control of a huge chunk of the remaining petroleum on the planet.  Cheney was incensed after Desert Storm that Bush Sr. packed up our troops and came home.  He felt that since we spent all that money going over there, we should set up camp and stay indefinitely.  At least Bush Sr.'s advisors were able to convince him about what a bad idea that would be. The fact that all his cronies have made a mint from the botched effort to rebuild is simply icing on the cake.

Just me, etc.

Sinergy




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.015625