|
Termyn8or -> RE: Sissy vs. TV vs. CD (2/26/2007 12:01:03 AM)
|
Just a quick comment aforehand. All of us could be labelled as wierdos by people who are "normal", and now we are talking labels amongst ourselves.
On to the topic. I agree, I think a sissy is not into it for the feel of the clothes, it is what you see in the mirror. It might be more of an aesthetic thing. I think a CD or TV gets pleasure from the clothes themselves, on them, not necessarily in the mirror. Shit, this is proving as easy to figure out as those other aspects of human psychology.
I am a full blown Man, I like Women. But I will admit I have some "underwear". The main thing that appeals to me is the fit and feel.
Really though, the bodyshaping of the things I have worn is an issue, perhaps the humiliation is poking my sub/bottom side. That is a component, but mainly it is the restriction, the confinement of the body. So I am not TS or CD, but I understand a bit.
I mean if I do this, looking in a mirror is an experience too. So subdued and not leaving the house.
I think sissies are looking for something other than what TV/CDs seek. It is a form of humiliation, and I think that is what they crave.
I don't want to infer that there is antything bad about kink with this nexr analogy, but it is the best I can come up with right now.
Drug abuse, whether it is alcohols, smoke, coke, crack, whatever, it all comes from one idea, or something in the mind. If people can stay legal and out of trouble they can abuse a substance for decades. But they point is, there is a basis for this behavior, and whatever the drug of choice is, that addictive bone the the person''s brain did it. What particular substance they abuse is simply the flavor they choose.
So, not wanting to get into the word game, that's another thread, kink is deviance. Now who the hell said deviance is bad. Of course engineers who find that their measuring instruments are a bit off, but you can't apply that to humanity.
Some would say that anything that sexually does not produce offspring is wrong. HELLO !, have you seem the population figures ?
Which brings us to my hypothesis, I think that kink and homosexuality is a response by the human race AS AN ORGANISM, in toto, to regulate itself.
This is really off topic, but I got this really good article written long ago about overpopulation, that is for another thread. But it states that when population increases, there are actually glandular changes, this was observed in animals, but then we are not vegetable nor mineral.
Whatever direction a person's kink takes is a personal thing, or their expression of it. I was at a fetish ball, and I had a blast, it was great. I saw a guy there in full baby garb, big sucker and all. A far cry from my attitude a long time ago, I actually admire his courage to go out and be in semi-public dressed up like that.
Never met the guy, but he kinda encouraged me to do my next outrageous thing, and this time it is totally legal and almost safe. I indend to go back to that club in a CB with a rear shield, all I have to do is resizre it. I want to figure out how to just wear chaps, so it is exposed. Of course I will wear a shirt and shoes. But if he has the balls to do that I should have the balls to do this.
I want to talk to that guy next time. Perhaps put some beer in his bawaa. That's not making fun of him, not at all. This is a different kink than mine, I want to hear about it.
I think we are all driven by the same basic thing, but we are driven in different directions.
T
|
|
|
|
