|
darchChylde -> RE: Forced Bisexuality from the Gay side (2/21/2007 2:00:40 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: LotusSong
Now, the boy would have had to get turned on enough to do the deed, thus making him Bisexual..
i don't know about this, as physical manipulation of the penis, whether oral or manual tends to create an involuntary physiological reaction in most physically healthy males
also, this sort of stimulation could be done by his male Dominant, or himself with a cockring used to hold him at necessary attention; if these methods fail there are always chemical stimulants which can be employed.
this goes back to the old argument that a man cannot be raped by a woman via vaginal penetration because he has to be physically turned on in order to act, and thus he wanted it... i know from personal experience that this is not the case, as a dominant that i had casual non-sexual relations with had tied me up and used me sexually against my will and against my stated limits; this kept me from the scene for several years... i am straight and she was physically attractive and able though manual, oral, and visual stimulation able to bring me to erection no matter how terrified, angry, and downright terrible i felt; while i was able to physically achieve erection and orgasm, it was far from a pleasant experience for me and shattered my ability to trust others for some time
in conclusion, i don't see how being able to physically respond enough to have vaginal penetration would make someone bisexual, just as being able to get aroused and achieve orgasm with a man does not make a man bisexual or gay... the ability to choose and enjoy such an act on every level is what matters in that distinction... physical responsiveness can not be the defining factor, as there are many documented cases of women feeling incredsidibly guild ridden due to physically achieving orgasm during the act of rape
|
|
|
|
