LadyEllen
Posts: 10931
Joined: 6/30/2006 From: Stourport-England Status: offline
|
True enough Cyberdude - provocative is in the eye of the beholder. And I wasnt laughing btw. I see huge issues with this, along the lines of the crazy "violent porn images" law they have planned for here; its so subjective as to be meaningless. Under the proposed US bill, I could argue that a livery sales brochure showing a picture of a 12 year old girl in riding boots with a crop in her hand would be provocative, after all; for some, it undoubtedly would be, whilst for most of us we see it for what it is, a means of advertising riding gear. E
_____________________________
In a test against the leading brand, 9 out of 10 participants couldnt tell the difference. Dumbasses.
|