Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Will this do ? Chemistry


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Will this do ? Chemistry Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Will this do ? Chemistry - 2/7/2007 7:35:11 AM   
rosanegra


Posts: 277
Joined: 1/1/2006
Status: offline
'Nillas climb mountains to have sex? Well I suppose there have been some who might have but... I am saying that kinky sex is more dangerous than the vanilla kind. There are lots of precautions that can be taken, but I think you just wanted to argue something I said.

I didn't say nothing was more dangerous than kink.

(in reply to LuckyAlbatross)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Will this do ? Chemistry - 2/7/2007 7:37:39 AM   
bludemonn


Posts: 2619
Joined: 9/10/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

LadyEllen this one is for you: Chemistry
 
INVISIBLE REALITY
Think about it. The normal, straight, vanilla couple goes about their day-to-day, routinely sticking to their...routine, and most often without an extraordinary word or thought. In a M/s relationship, isn't there always a feeling of more. Don't we have almost what one might call a lascivious and viscereal feeling between us and isn't that created by what we could call...our invisible reality ? Our invisible reality is that constant chemistry between us, just in being together, something that we have created and what forms the very basis for our command, control and obediance in addition to our ongoing sex and kink pleasures. We are both traveling on that never ending safari of the subconcious, both living in anticipation and surprise. Our invisible reality...now that's chemistry, right ?



I think you will also find that there is no such thing as a normal Vanilla couple, all of us have desires but some don't like to flaunt it 24/7 thats all....

However! If you activate the reArm procedure and transduce the incoming variable raw energy and pass it through the flux capacitor you can treble your output! ORRSUM!  

_____________________________

A hopeless dreamer she said, eyes of cloud and feet of lead.

(in reply to MrRodgers)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: Will this do ? Chemistry - 2/7/2007 7:39:01 AM   
bludemonn


Posts: 2619
Joined: 9/10/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: rosanegra

'Nillas climb mountains to have sex? Well I suppose there have been some who might have but... I am saying that kinky sex is more dangerous than the vanilla kind. There are lots of precautions that can be taken, but I think you just wanted to argue something I said.

I didn't say nothing was more dangerous than kink.



But wouldn't you say sex in general is kinky?..... ok with the lights ON. 

_____________________________

A hopeless dreamer she said, eyes of cloud and feet of lead.

(in reply to rosanegra)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: Will this do ? Chemistry - 2/7/2007 7:42:07 AM   
thetammyjo


Posts: 6322
Joined: 9/8/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: bludemonn

And what idiot came up with Vanilla? It smacks of 'them and us' really dosen't it! What if I want to be a bloody strawberry instead?


I don't know who came up with it but think about it this way.

When polls and surveys are done on ice cream, the number flavor is always vanilla. Vanilla is the basis of many ice cream treats -- you add things to the vanilla to get these treats, other flavors, candies, fruit, cream, nuts, etc.

I see the concept of vanilla as representing what the majority of society just does and the basis for what I do. I mean, even with my slave we are having a human relationship that we have added things to generally by talking and finding common ground and interests then agreeing to work on maintaining that dynamic. Vanilla is the basic human relationship -- everything else is additional.

I think people are living more than a vanilla life whether they are conscious of it or not. I think most people add some sprinkles or some cream or some fruit every now and then.

For me, this "basis human relationship" would be two or more people attempting to co-exist in some fashion. Generally I think most people think of it as sexual meaning it's just bodies (not toys or tools) without any agreed upon or ouvert power/authority dynamics. Personally I think most of these have power and authority dynamic which are either followed from example and not thought about OR which are a source of competition or conflict between people.

I actually don't have very many vanilla relationships in my life because I will push for the discussion and agreement about the dynamic and what the expectations are. I might be in the "top" role, the "bottom" role or in a partnership but I want these things clear so we can focus on the goals.

_____________________________

Love, Peace, Hugs, Kisses, Whips & Chains,

TammyJo

Check out my website at http://www.thetammyjo.com Or www.tammyjoeckhart.com

And my LJ where I post fiction in progress if you "friend" me at http://thetammyjo.livejournal.com/

(in reply to bludemonn)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: Will this do ? Chemistry - 2/7/2007 7:42:34 AM   
LuckyAlbatross


Posts: 19224
Joined: 10/25/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: rosanegra
'Nillas climb mountains to have sex? Well I suppose there have been some who might have but... I am saying that kinky sex is more dangerous than the vanilla kind. There are lots of precautions that can be taken, but I think you just wanted to argue something I said.

I didn't say nothing was more dangerous than kink.

Sex is sex- what makes sex "kinky?"  Biting?  Hair pulling?  Spanking?  Attitude? 

I'm not convinced that "kinky sex" is more risky than "vanilla sex" nor that what we do in "kinky sex" is much different than what a heck of a lot of vanillas do.

Not to mention, plenty of Ms couples have "vanilla sex."

And no, I don't just argue for argument's sake. 


_____________________________

Find stable partners, not a stable of partners.

"Sometimes my whore logic gets all fuzzy"- Californication

(in reply to rosanegra)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: Will this do ? Chemistry - 2/7/2007 7:55:03 AM   
bludemonn


Posts: 2619
Joined: 9/10/2006
Status: offline
Thanks Tammy that makes alot of sense but what i feel is sad is that people are separating themselves again i.e. you lot are Vanillas and we are kinky, i understand people who live the lifestyle but don't you think it causes a distinction between groups and thus promotes discrimination? OR do you feel that separation helps to verify 'friendly forces'? I have spoken to alot of people who would be considered Vanilla and ALL have kinks when you delve into there desires.  

_____________________________

A hopeless dreamer she said, eyes of cloud and feet of lead.

(in reply to LuckyAlbatross)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: Will this do ? Chemistry - 2/7/2007 8:05:42 AM   
Iskander


Posts: 264
Joined: 9/26/2006
Status: offline
Interesting post I stumble into after a long absence...
(Hey guys it's that pain in your frontal lobes again)

No... all chemestry needs energy in, to get energy out..
I learnt this the hard way over the last weekish..
Even ricecrackers taste better with a little spice.. Doesn't matter if it's a good flogging or tandem skydiving... An undercurrent.. (invisible reality.. pah... only invisible reality is the air we breathe) An undercurrent...  the boots gypsylee is putting on right now, which tells me to stop wanking ans start interacting...
yes... interaction is the key, vanilla, ricecracker or Sm..
who cares as long as you have fun...
yeah..

Isk...
(catch ya soon again...


(in reply to LuckyAlbatross)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: Will this do ? Chemistry - 2/7/2007 8:07:30 AM   
bludemonn


Posts: 2619
Joined: 9/10/2006
Status: offline
So you recommend chilli on my willy?

_____________________________

A hopeless dreamer she said, eyes of cloud and feet of lead.

(in reply to Iskander)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: Will this do ? Chemistry - 2/7/2007 8:53:28 AM   
CrazyC


Posts: 949
Joined: 9/28/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

 Don't we have almost what one might call a lascivious and viscereal feeling between us and isn't that created by what we could call...our invisible reality ? Our invisible reality is that constant chemistry between us, just in being together, something that we have created and what forms the very basis for our command, control and obediance in addition to our ongoing sex and kink pleasures. We are both traveling on that never ending safari of the subconcious, both living in anticipation and surprise. Our invisible reality...now that's chemistry, right ?


Why would one want to live in an invisible reality? Aren't you over dramatising something that is just plain chemistry between two people? Chemistry then is just that chemistry. The exchange of energy can happen in any type of relationship, be it long term or temporary.

side note.... I am finding it funny that i am saying this since i don't know how many times LA has called me on my dramatising. Hmmm....maybe i am learning.

<edited because my fingers aren't functioning this early in the morning>

< Message edited by CrazyC -- 2/7/2007 8:54:57 AM >


_____________________________

"You never lose by loving. You always lose by holding back." Barbara De Angelis

(in reply to MrRodgers)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: Will this do ? Chemistry - 2/7/2007 8:54:28 AM   
juliaoceania


Posts: 21383
Joined: 4/19/2006
From: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Status: offline
My best friend is a submissive like me, and we used to talk about how high intensity power exchange relationships really can be. They can seem all consuming at first... but you know that guy with the wax wings that flew too close to the sun? The higher the intensity, the more danger that one will crash and burn, or just burn out. She and I have discussed this concept because she was explaining to me how people she had met in the lifestyle did not often have long term relationships of any significant length, so we mused among ourselves why this would be.

I think that people still have to pay the mortgage, the credit cards, unmentionables need feeding, even when we are kinky and into power exchange. I think that vanillas I have known that had strong commitment to each other are always thinking about the other, that is why they are still happily together, they do not take each other for granted.

_____________________________

Once you label me, you negate me ~ Soren Kierkegaard

Reality has a well known Liberal Bias ~ Stephen Colbert

Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. Eleanor Roosevelt

(in reply to MrRodgers)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: Will this do ? Chemistry - 2/7/2007 9:02:41 AM   
Celeste43


Posts: 3066
Joined: 2/4/2006
From: NYS
Status: offline
Aha, I see the problem here. You are basing this on your own experiences and are missing one important fact. You aren't vanilla, you need a power inequal relationship not a power equal one. Therefore a vanilla relationship which is power equal will not satisfy you. No matter how many other areas you may have been compatible with, you were not getting your power inequality needs met in an equal power relationship. As a result, of course such a relationship would leave you unable to make a strong connection.

However, consider the converse. A power equal person who winds up in a relationship with someone apparently very compatible except this someone wants an unequal relationship. Either they are forced to make more decisions than they want or they feel trapped because any decision they do make descends into argument. As a result, despite the other compatibilities they cannot form a strong connection.

Apples and oranges, bluntly. Any vanilla relationship you had was unfulfilling to you because it was vanilla. To a vanilla, a D/s relationship would be unfulfilling because it wasn't vanilla. You aren't vanilla so you can't have any experience of a truly fulfilling vanilla relationship. But putting down everyone who isn't M/s? Rude at the least.

(in reply to bludemonn)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: Will this do ? Chemistry - 2/7/2007 10:23:00 AM   
mbes


Posts: 465
Joined: 12/14/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers
To merely mention what I have seen myself in far too many vanilla relationships over the years...it is ALL vanilla...and very routine but not here or why are we here ? This lifestyle isn't better or certainly much more extreme and far less routine than vanilla ?

Didn't want to use the word dynamic here ? Rather, I thought I'd try to illusttrate this as a feeling between two or more people in a 24/7 M/s relationship.


If it is something you "feel" and is "invisible", why are you surprised that you don't SEE it in other types of relationships?

(in reply to MrRodgers)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: Will this do ? Chemistry - 2/7/2007 10:57:48 AM   
adaddysgirl


Posts: 1093
Joined: 3/2/2004
From: Syracuse, NY
Status: offline
Iskander????  
 
DG

(in reply to Iskander)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: Will this do ? Chemistry - 2/10/2007 6:45:31 PM   
touchthesky


Posts: 121
Joined: 1/27/2007
Status: offline
one of the things i love about BDSM is the intense focus of the sex n play... that u dont always find in vanilla. I think most of us are more sexually preoccupied than your average bear. But to just try to lump all non BDSM relationships into vanilla and try to generalize will always be faulty

(in reply to bludemonn)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: Will this do ? Chemistry - 2/10/2007 7:08:50 PM   
puella


Posts: 2457
Joined: 12/2/2004
Status: offline
I wonder what that constant need to feel as if we are more than another 'group'  is about.....?

(in reply to MrRodgers)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: Will this do ? Chemistry - 2/10/2007 7:26:08 PM   
touchthesky


Posts: 121
Joined: 1/27/2007
Status: offline
oh i think its human to think ur thing is special, isn't it?

(in reply to puella)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: Will this do ? Chemistry - 2/13/2007 11:40:49 PM   
DarkDreams123


Posts: 74
Joined: 1/25/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Celeste43

Aha, I see the problem here. You are basing this on your own experiences and are missing one important fact. You aren't vanilla, you need a power inequal relationship not a power equal one. Therefore a vanilla relationship which is power equal will not satisfy you. No matter how many other areas you may have been compatible with, you were not getting your power inequality needs met in an equal power relationship. As a result, of course such a relationship would leave you unable to make a strong connection.

However, consider the converse. A power equal person who winds up in a relationship with someone apparently very compatible except this someone wants an unequal relationship. Either they are forced to make more decisions than they want or they feel trapped because any decision they do make descends into argument. As a result, despite the other compatibilities they cannot form a strong connection.

Apples and oranges, bluntly. Any vanilla relationship you had was unfulfilling to you because it was vanilla. To a vanilla, a D/s relationship would be unfulfilling because it wasn't vanilla. You aren't vanilla so you can't have any experience of a truly fulfilling vanilla relationship. But putting down everyone who isn't M/s? Rude at the least.


Hi Celeste,

I like the way you put this. I think this is an important insight into "what makes us tick."

It is difficult to step outside your own experience and take a look at someone else's situation without being prejudice.

Difficult indeed.

-Dark Dreams

(in reply to Celeste43)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: Will this do ? Chemistry - 2/13/2007 11:47:18 PM   
OedipusRexIt


Posts: 634
Joined: 11/15/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: hisannabelle

i don't think the chemistry between kinky people is any more or less special or real than the chemistry between non-kinky people. :)

that said, there are certain aspects of kink relationships that lend themselves to more involved trust and communication, but even so, that doesn't guarantee that kink relationships have better trust and communication than vanilla relationships.



I can only speak from personal experience,  which leads me to disagree. 

Having had what I consider top quality in both areas, the good kink connections are infinitely deeper.  It requires no explanation, it's a Truth.

or I wouldn't be here.

_____________________________

"My name is Inigo Montoya, you killed my father, prepare to die..."

(in reply to hisannabelle)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: Will this do ? Chemistry - 2/13/2007 11:50:31 PM   
DarkDreams123


Posts: 74
Joined: 1/25/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: puella

I wonder what that constant need to feel as if we are more than another 'group'  is about.....?


Hi Puella,

I think this "disease" affects almost all of us at one time or other.

Think about when you were a young child. I remember getting in to an argument with my next-door-neighbor and friend about who's dad could beat the other's up!?

Think of when you were in school. Your school was better than the rest. Your school had the best sports teams, best musical groups, etc.

What do new parents do? They look at their baby and think it is the smartest child ever born. We do the same thing with our pets.

I'll bet that if we were to take a survey and ask people to rate their own intelligence, far more than half would rate themselves above average.

Can any of us truely escape from this?

-Dark Dreams

(in reply to puella)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: Will this do ? Chemistry - 2/14/2007 9:15:48 AM   
hereyesruponyou


Posts: 770
Joined: 1/22/2007
Status: offline
I've had the chemistry you talk about in a vanilla relationship with my first husband. I agree it was undefinable. I think there were visible signs, but there was more of an invisible peace of fitting together perfectly, as well as the ability to laugh together in a way no one else understood, and being able to be turned on with a look or a thought. This lasted 13 years and only got stronger. Unfortunately he passed away much to early for it to be fair.
 
Since then i have tried vanilla and bdsm relationships from dating to another marriage (mistake), and discovered that there are different types of chemistry in all relationships that work. It's easier for me to find "sexual" chemistry or "friend/trust" chemistry with someone than to find both.
 
IMHO if you have found something incredible in the chemistry you have with someone in this realm then you have that "extra special something" everyone craves. congrats and enjoy

_____________________________

Never grow a wishbone where your backbone ought to be


(in reply to bludemonn)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Will this do ? Chemistry Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.172