CreativeDominant
Posts: 11032
Joined: 3/11/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyKimberly33 Okay to clear the situation some...I do work full time and always have, as does My husband. We put ourselves through school and have continued to improve our lives to the point I am comfortable with, not wealthy by any means but comfortable. We both make enough money that if we were to seperate, neither would be financially devastated. We have discused many times if the slave should work out of the home or not. It is My/our opinion if he is able to manage the home from cleaning to maintenance, be a personal assistant and a playmate for Me he will more than earn his keep. As of now we pay for dry cleaning, a house cleaning service, a lawn care service and grocery delivery for the convenience of it, because we do both work and choose to do so. It does add up to quite a bit each month, and he should be able to replace these cost plus more, such as no more calling for take out because I am too tired to cook, because dinner will be waiting when I get home. As you can see this is not the situation for everyone, if You wish your slave to work, by all means have him work Lady Kimberly I edit this to add I do not see what would be wrong if I did not work and My husband had no problem with My slave not working. The slave makes life easier for us both, but is directly Mine. I could go to a deep dark place and ask if the wife does not work then, per CD, should she have permission to have a child, that is a much bigger expense in My eyes than a slave... Actually, LK...that spot you just went to is not anywhere near the spot I am. A child is not a slave. Most people understand that raising a child is not the same as introducing a full-grown, non-related adult whose duties and functions in no ways compare to the duties and functions of your child. If you, or anyone else, decides to have a child it is usually because you and your partner are in love and wish to bring a child into the world...a human that is half of your makeup and half of his, a hope for the future, someone to nurture and raise and guide and love that you can watch grow from infancy to childhood to their "terrible" teen years to ... hopefully... a mature adult. Do you see any but the vaguest similarity in comparing a child to a slave? And by the way, your statement about "as per CD, should a non-working wife have permission to have a child"...you show me anywhere in my posts where I stated any such thing or even implied it, from my first post up to the post before this one and, throw in this one while you are at it. You are working. Great. You did not make that clear in your first post. And with this post you have made it clear that part of the financial support of the slave and his provision of these services would be paid for partially by you. You've also made things clear that were not clear in your first post. As I said in my last post, the fact that I see a problem with someone who is not financially providing for wanted slave expecting their spouse to financially provide for another human that they (the financial provider) will not get service from is a problem I would have whether the non-financial person expecting this was male or female. So please, do not cast me on the dump heap of neanderthal chauvinism. I may be chauvinist but surely not in the way that has been implied and I have made it clear in several statements now that my view on this is not from a "female-bashing" perspective but from a situational perspective only. Continuing to categorize it in any other way is at the least, misleading. (from my last post) Just to make it even more clear as to my view on the situation::: Lady K is now Sir K. Sir K has a wife. Sir K wants a slave. Sir K does not want said slave to work outside the home...Sir K's slave's duties will be to take care of Sir K.s needs and wants first and foremost. There now...everything is the same only it is a man instead of a woman. If said male dominant did not work outside the home and expected the wife...who does...to pay for his slave who was not going to be slave in any way to the wife, I would not be wholly appreciative of that situation either.
|