|
LadyEllen -> RE: Overcrowded prisons in the uk serious offenders are not going to jail even serious sex offenders (1/28/2007 1:26:26 PM)
|
Sorry Popeye - it doesnt work that way here. If one is physically attacked, then one is entitled to defend oneself only with equal force and only with the aim of immediate self defence. Anything above that - using overpowering weaponry or force or actually attacking the aggressor onesself, will put the defender in court on a charge of assault. This applies even if one catches a burglar in one's house, standing at the end of one's bed about to smash one's head in with a baseball bat; one is entitled only to use equal force sufficient for defence. The law is disinterested in the main as to what was available for defence (ie, if you only had a gun and shot him, you'd be in trouble) and disinterested in how much fear you felt and so judged what was necessary for your defence (ie if you kicked the shit out of him). Google "Tony Martin" as Sleazy suggested, to see what our laws are like. The instance you mention with the footballers vs the drug dealers would result in serious charges of assault being laid against the footballers, as well as conspiracy to commit etc with a gaol sentence more than likely since the jury would be directed to find the accused guilty, and in the UK we have a system of set minimum sentences for each offence. I disagree with mob law Popeye, though I would certainly agree that our system has some very odd priorites from time to time, which is a contributory factor in what leads to so little respect for the penal system here, where the worst criminals often receive far more compassion and support than their victims. For example, state paid social workers are called in to help the criminal, but victim support is a charity organisation. E
|
|
|
|