Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

Stupid Attorney General Tricks


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> Stupid Attorney General Tricks Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Stupid Attorney General Tricks - 1/19/2007 5:43:47 PM   
farglebargle


Posts: 10715
Joined: 6/15/2005
From: Albany, NY
Status: offline
The setup:

Article I, Section 9, Clause 2 of the Contitution: “The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.”

The Punchline:


SPECTER: Where you have the Constitution having an explicit provision that the writ of habeas corpus cannot be suspended except for rebellion or invasion, and you have the Supreme Court saying that habeas corpus rights apply to Guantanamo detainees — aliens in Guantanamo — after an elaborate discussion as to why, how can the statutory taking of habeas corpus — when there’s an express constitutional provision that it can’t be suspended, and an explicit Supreme Court holding that it applies to Guantanamo alien detainees.

GONZALES: A couple things, Senator. I believe that the Supreme Court case you’re referring to dealt only with the statutory right to habeas, not the constitutional right to habeas.

SPECTER: Well, you’re not right about that. It’s plain on its face they are talking about the constitutional right to habeas corpus. They talk about habeas corpus being guaranteed by the Constitution, except in cases of an invasion or rebellion. They talk about John Runningmeade and the Magna Carta and the doctrine being imbedded in the Constitution.

GONZALES: Well, sir, the fact that they may have talked about the constitutional right to habeas doesn’t mean that the decision dealt with that constitutional right to habeas.

SPECTER: When did you last read the case?

GONZALES: It has been a while, but I’ll be happy to — I will go back and look at it.

SPECTER: I looked at it yesterday and this morning again.

GONZALES: I will go back and look at it. The fact that the Constitution — again, there is no express grant of habeas in the Constitution. There is a prohibition against taking it away. But it’s never been the case, and I’m not a Supreme —

SPECTER: Now, wait a minute. Wait a minute. The constitution says you can’t take it away, except in the case of rebellion or invasion. Doesn’t that mean you have the right of habeas corpus, unless there is an invasion or rebellion?

GONZALES: I meant by that comment, the Constitution doesn’t say, “Every individual in the United States or every citizen is hereby granted or assured the right to habeas.” It doesn’t say that. It simply says the right of habeas corpus shall not be suspended except by —

SPECTER: You may be treading on your interdiction and violating common sense, Mr. Attorney General.

GONZALES: Um.

_____________________________

It's not every generation that gets to watch a civilization fall. Looks like we're in for a hell of a show.

ברוך אתה, אדוני אלוקינו, ריבון העולמים, מי יוצר צמחים ריחניים
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: Stupid Attorney General Tricks - 1/19/2007 5:55:17 PM   
WyrdRich


Posts: 1733
Joined: 1/3/2005
Status: offline
       It simply isn't possible for the Attorney General to say "Well, the Supreme Court really stepped on their dicks with that decision," no matter how badly he wants to.

(in reply to farglebargle)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: Stupid Attorney General Tricks - 1/19/2007 6:19:05 PM   
UtopianRanger


Posts: 3251
Status: offline
Who woulda thought we'd one day be reading an egregious exchange like that from a guy who's supposedly in charge of protecting our constitutional rights. A few noted legal scholars have said that the recently enacted ' Military commissions act ' can essentially turn every citizen into a non-citizen and then an enemy combatant.



- R


_____________________________

"If you are going to win any battle, you have to do one thing. You have to make the mind run the body. Never let the body tell the mind what to do... the body is never tired if the mind is not tired."

-General George S. Patton


(in reply to farglebargle)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: Stupid Attorney General Tricks - 1/20/2007 4:51:30 AM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle

Article I, Section 9, Clause 2 of the Contitution: “The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.”


So ... can someone tell me the difference between a "Privilege" and a "right"?

FirmKY


_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to farglebargle)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: Stupid Attorney General Tricks - 1/20/2007 5:08:25 AM   
farglebargle


Posts: 10715
Joined: 6/15/2005
From: Albany, NY
Status: offline
I think Al's biggest point is that he is "So Smart, He'll Cut Himself".

You're right about the Privilege thing.

Rights come from Our Creator. There aren't Writs just floating about naturally. From a "Strict, Legalese" point of view he's got a point.

The use "Right to a Writ of Habeas Corpus", is not PRECISELY correct. However, it's an essential part of the Liberty Right referenced in the Declaration of Independence, and it's suspension so infrequent, it's common referred to that way.

However, he gets lost on the trivia.

quote:


GONZALES: Well, sir, the fact that they may have talked about the constitutional right to habeas doesn’t mean that the decision dealt with that constitutional right to habeas.

SPECTER: When did you last read the case?

GONZALES: It has been a while, but I’ll be happy to — I will go back and look at it.

SPECTER: I looked at it yesterday and this morning again.


At that point Gonzales looked like a total fucking idiot.

quote:


SPECTER: Now, wait a minute. Wait a minute. The constitution says you can’t take it away, except in the case of rebellion or invasion. Doesn’t that mean you have the right of habeas corpus, unless there is an invasion or rebellion?


Now here's that "Lower Case" "right" usage again.

GOZNO: "Well, sir, the fact that they may have talked about the constitutional right to habeas doesn’t mean that the decision dealt with that constitutional right to habeas."

Hmm... So I guess Gonzo IS saying there IS a constitutional right. He's discussing that the supremes discussed it.

Why is Al being evasive?



< Message edited by farglebargle -- 1/20/2007 5:10:20 AM >


_____________________________

It's not every generation that gets to watch a civilization fall. Looks like we're in for a hell of a show.

ברוך אתה, אדוני אלוקינו, ריבון העולמים, מי יוצר צמחים ריחניים

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: Stupid Attorney General Tricks - 1/20/2007 11:07:05 AM   
Zensee


Posts: 1564
Joined: 9/4/2004
Status: offline
What Al is saying is, if you don't have something to begin with you can't take it away. Obviously the framers of the Constitution sought to affirm the absence of any right or privilege of Habeas Corpus.

(Oh shit. That almost makes sense!) Do you guys need a new A.G.?

Z.


_____________________________

"Before enlightenment, chop wood and carry water. After enlightenment, chop wood and carry water." (proverb)

(in reply to farglebargle)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: Stupid Attorney General Tricks - 1/21/2007 4:21:26 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
To paraphrase old Bill "A facist thug by any other name would still be the AG"
thompson

(in reply to farglebargle)
Profile   Post #: 7
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> Stupid Attorney General Tricks Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.078