RE: intoxication fetish

RE: intoxication fetish (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion

Message

crouchingtigress -> RE: intoxication fetish (1/9/2007 7:44:46 AM)
quote: Several people have expressed they dont know what an "intoxication fetish" is. So far, you have told us what it isn't. (It isnt chloroform or drugs and alcohol, according to your posts.) Maybe you could clue us in as to what you are talking about so that we could have an opportunity for discussion. One thing about this poster is that he never in the many years that i have read him on the other site has ever come back to reply to his posts...its one of the odd things about him. but i am not here to flame him, actually i think in the years since the chloroform post and ensuing flame war he has grown alot and has offered the other board a number of good conversation starters and as Juliet says has not flamed back even after pretty constant verbal ass kickings. as that he has not come back to clarify and as such nullified the revelence of this thread, i dont think i am hijacking, i jumped in to say that he never answers posts because i know that it can be frustrating to write heartfelt replies and then not get feed back from him. its nice to see so many folks from over there over here now, i wonder why that is. i know i defected a couple of years ago because the black back round was hurting my eyes and i also felt that there was sort of a fraternity energy over there and new people often got hazed....but mostly it was the black back round thing......

onestandingstill -> RE: intoxication fetish (1/9/2007 7:53:18 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: crouchingtigress quote: Several people have expressed they dont know what an "intoxication fetish" is. So far, you have told us what it isn't. (It isnt chloroform or drugs and alcohol, according to your posts.) Maybe you could clue us in as to what you are talking about so that we could have an opportunity for discussion. One thing about this poster is that he never in the many years that i have read him on the other site has ever come back to reply to his posts...its one of the odd things about him. but i am not here to flame him, actually i think in the years since the chloroform post and ensuing flame war he has grown alot and has offered the other board a number of good conversation starters and as Juliet says has not flamed back even after pretty constant verbal ass kickings. as that he has not come back to clarify and as such nullified the revelence of this thread, i dont think i am hijacking, i jumped in to say that he never answers posts because i know that it can be frustrating to write heartfelt replies and then not get feed back from him. its nice to see so many folks from over there over here now, i wonder why that is. i know i defected a couple of years ago because the black back round was hurting my eyes and i also felt that there was sort of a fraternity energy over there and new people often got hazed....but mostly it was the black back round thing...... He actually did come back to the thread, he just didn't choose to give us any clue what he's talking about. It's more he comes here and made some unclear statement to see what life the thread would take on it's own or something. I don't think he wants a real answer at all and is just being manipulative. Maybe that's his get off leaving others in the dark with no clue what's going on scurrying to find and answer that would be on target. I say before we start taking the arrows and putting them in our bows he needs to give us a target or we need to ignore his half assed incomplete questions. suzanne

justheather -> RE: intoxication fetish (1/9/2007 7:55:45 AM)
Thanks for the heads-up, amy. I dont know where "over there" is, but I like it here just fine anyway. :-)

Aileen68 -> RE: intoxication fetish (1/9/2007 7:57:24 AM)
It's been less than a day since this thread started. Perhaps he's working? Crucifixions should only begin after at least three days after a no show. [;)]

canupleaseme -> RE: intoxication fetish (1/9/2007 8:07:53 AM)
If your talkin about the site i think your takin about i dont go on it for the very same reasons. Its just so hard to read with the black background. But i have to give it my respect because i foud my boy on there just by sheer chance [:D]

crouchingtigress -> RE: intoxication fetish (1/9/2007 8:11:03 AM)
quote: He actually did come back to the thread, he just didn't choose to give us any clue what he's talking about. It's more he comes here and made some unclear statement to see what life the thread would take on it's own or something. I don't think he wants a real answer at all and is just being manipulative. Maybe that's his get off leaving others in the dark with no clue what's going on scurrying to find and answer that would be on target. I say before we start taking the arrows and putting them in our bows he needs to give us a target or we need to ignore his half assed incomplete questions. suzanne Susanne you are right he did, and it was the first time that i ever saw him do it after a number of years of reading his posts and honestly it took me aback. i think it will be interesting to see what happens over here with him, as LA says for what ever reason this board does not seem to have alot of drama, cliques and flames like so many other boards do. Those that come here to be incendiary or to get attention seem to just fall by the way side after just a short amount of time..."their seeds can find no purchase." ~Nicolas Cage Raising Arizona heather...i like it just fine here too. aileen...i have no intention of crucifing him, for what ever reason i have a tender spot in my heart for him, i was just sharing years of past experiance...[;)]

domiguy -> RE: intoxication fetish (1/9/2007 6:50:19 PM)
Maybe his posts are so deep they are not to be understood by the common man ...perhaps 'cuz they are "WAY HOMERS!"------- Glen: Shit, man, think about it! I guess it's what they call a "way homer." H.I.: Why's that? Glen: 'Cause you only get it on the way home. H.I.: I'm already home, Glen. -Raising Arizona out. D.G. p.s. Jesus please protect me from your followers.

LTRsubNW -> RE: intoxication fetish (1/9/2007 8:10:14 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MasterHXB it's not about chloroform. It's a fetish with many different sub fetishs in it. I don't drink or do drugs, or wanting to start a problem here. I have found so many into this fetish. Just wanted to know if there were into it as well here. (You may want to give some consideration to explaining exactly WTF YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT!) It's a thought.

MasterHXB -> RE: intoxication fetish (1/9/2007 11:13:20 PM)
Anybody who wants to talk about please feel free to email me on this site.

simplyangelic1 -> RE: intoxication fetish (1/9/2007 11:32:43 PM)
I'm still wondering what an intoxication fetish is. Please oh please don't let it be something like a Roman shower fetish or I will have to add to my list of limits again.

julietsierra -> RE: intoxication fetish (1/10/2007 3:29:05 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MasterHXB Anybody who wants to talk about please feel free to email me on this site. LOL HXB, you always remind me of summer! In the summer, my Master and I enjoy fishing. He has a cottage on the river and we can fish from the front porch. Each morning, he would put a worm on his hook and drop it into the water. Where we are, you can see down into the water a bit. From there, I'd watch the little blue gills and sun fish come up to the hook. You could tell the fish that'd been out there longer. They'd look at the hook, bump it a couple of times and move on. Those were the ones we'd caught earlier and thrown back because they were too small. They knew what that little worm down there meant, and they'd swim right past. There were other fish though, who didn't realize what they were looking at. We'd joke and say they were the ones who evidently skipped "school" (puns on schools of fish). They were the ones that we reeled in every morning. Some we threw back. Others became part of our breakfast. This morning, as I was reading your thread again, I realized that you were like us on the porch - tossing your line in to see what/who might nibble. And instead of a possibly interesting thread on a different kind of play, with people who were willing to hear you out without all the caustic knee-jerk responses, what we got was what I suppose it always was - a fishing expedition, with a one line question about some sort of play no one's really understanding as the bait. Yep... you remind me of summer. Happy fishing! juliet

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.03125