Taken in Hand relationships (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


moongoddessxxo -> Taken in Hand relationships (1/7/2007 2:23:05 PM)

I am curious about a Taken in Hand relationship, and would be interested in learning more if anyone here knows more about them.  I understand that it is a monogamous, loving, committed relationship, and the man is in charge, things like that.  I have my children in the home, as well, so it seems more suited for me.  Some of the aspects of BDSM scare me.  And I am looking for a true caring relationship.  I feel that I am a sub, but don't think I am able to be a slave, either. 




Caitriona -> RE: Taken in Hand relationships (1/7/2007 2:27:51 PM)

The only source of information on this topic that I know of is:

http://www.takeninhand.com/

Which I figure you might have already seen, but there it is just in case.




toservez -> RE: Taken in Hand relationships (1/7/2007 2:34:00 PM)

My knowledge of taken in hand relationship is that it is D/s light and I do not mean that in anyway as a put down. It is basically a spouse being the head of the household, usually the man, and he sets the rules. Like a sterner 1950’s type situation.

What take in hand does is use one form of pain, spanking as it’s physical discipline tool instead of more toys, areas on the body and other things a D/s relationship might use to instill discipline.

I guess in summary it is a strong vanilla D/s relationship with minimal to no kink. There are a few nice websites on it that you can find with a simple google search.




BDSM05478 -> RE: Taken in Hand relationships (1/7/2007 2:45:58 PM)

from reading your post and profile, I would say some form of daddy-isc might be an area of intrest....... but I think you would have more luck in the vanilla market than any alt arena.




innatedesire -> RE: Taken in Hand relationships (1/7/2007 2:50:29 PM)

I agree




NaiveTempest -> RE: Taken in Hand relationships (1/7/2007 3:11:58 PM)

Good info to know. Never heard of this but it makes sense for some people who struggle with the D/s or M/s dynamics. A sort of low-key D/s relationship. Vanilla...but not.




julietsierra -> RE: Taken in Hand relationships (1/7/2007 4:17:30 PM)

Well, they have a yahoo group and I joined it to see what it was about.
Evidently they are not interested in those who may not be married but still would want to live their lives this way. It appears to be very much a couples thing. So, while they do have a yahoo group in which to learn more about what they say straight from the horse's mouth, so to speak, they would prefer it if you didn't speak  if you happen to not be married.

Beyond that, I didn't see much difference between them and what they profess they are NOT.

juliet




Hisgirlforever -> RE: Taken in Hand relationships (1/7/2007 4:34:46 PM)

I am in a Taken in Hand, HOH (Head Of Household) or Domestic Discipline relationship with my husband 24/7 all the time. Here is a great site that has lots of info and great people who are very accepting, it is mostly married men and women were the Man is the head of the household but we have members who are single, gay, female dominate, etc. Anyway check it out if you want more info

http://ddrelationships.com/phpBB/index.php




JolieGirl -> RE: Taken in Hand relationships (1/7/2007 5:04:38 PM)

I am in a taken in hand relationship now.  For me, it is perfect.  He is the head of the household.  For us its more than just spanking,  but the best part is   no nipple clamps.    Yea.    I really dont like them.  




LuckyAlbatross -> RE: Taken in Hand relationships (1/7/2007 5:18:33 PM)

Is that a new term for the whole "domestic discipline" thing?

IMO it's just a justification for the wife to submit to the husband and do some spanking.  Lots of people find they are more free to be kinky and set clear gender based rules in the relationship if they have a label to put on it.




adaddysgirl -> RE: Taken in Hand relationships (1/7/2007 5:20:24 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hisgirlforever

I am in a Taken in Hand, HOH (Head Of Household) or Domestic Discipline relationship with my husband 24/7 all the time. Here is a great site that has lots of info and great people who are very accepting, it is mostly married men and women were the Man is the head of the household but we have members who are single, gay, female dominate, etc. Anyway check it out if you want more info

http://ddrelationships.com/phpBB/index.php



Great link His!  i am also into the TiH and when i ever get around to reposting my profile, i will be including this in it.  Glad to hear yours works for you  [&:]
 
Daddysgirl




adaddysgirl -> RE: Taken in Hand relationships (1/7/2007 5:33:33 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LuckyAlbatross

Is that a new term for the whole "domestic discipline" thing?

It's very closely related and some do interchange the two terms.

IMO it's just a justification for the wife to submit to the husband and do some spanking.  Lots of people find they are more free to be kinky and set clear gender based rules in the relationship if they have a label to put on it.

It's really no different than any other labels people use....sub, slave, switch, top, bottom, dom, Master...etc.   And for some, it's not about the kink. 
 
i once belonged to a DD group where there was a couple, both around 39 yrs old at the time.  Her father was a Minister and she grew up in a DD household, where the mother deferred to the father and spanking was used as a form of discipline, for both her and the mother, and not for kink.  She married a guy who was raised in the same dynamic, and they shared the same dynamic and raised their daughter the same way.  In neither case was the spanking a 'kink'.   As a matter of fact, there was no bdsm involved at all....their 'play' or sex was strictly vanilla. 
 
So some do live this for other reasons than the kink. 
 
DG





SusanofO -> RE: Taken in Hand relationships (1/7/2007 6:11:16 PM)

I have spent some time reading the Taken in hand website, and think it's an excellent site to read. I really think a "taken in hand" relationship could be just about anything you wan it to be, ultimately - but it is basically a D/s relationship.  Much of the writing available on that site seems to focus on spanking, rather than other bdsm activity, but - that could just be the only stories I've read include spanking. There's a LOT to read on that site.

- Susan




dawntreader -> RE: Taken in Hand relationships (1/7/2007 6:25:00 PM)

You and i must have been reading the site at the same time!lol
And i agree with your view on it...


quote:

ORIGINAL: SusanofO

I have spent some time reading the Taken in hand website, and think it's an excellent site to read. I really think a "taken in hand" relationship could be just about anything you wan it to be, ultimately - but it is basically a D/s relationship.  Much of the writing available on that site seems to focus on spanking, rather than other bdsm activity, but - that could just be the only stories I've read include spanking. There's a LOT to read on that site.

- Susan




mbes -> RE: Taken in Hand relationships (1/8/2007 6:30:49 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: adaddysgirl
i once belonged to a DD group where there was a couple, both around 39 yrs old at the time. Her father was a Minister and she grew up in a DD household, where the mother deferred to the father and spanking was used as a form of discipline, for both her and the mother, and not for kink. She married a guy who was raised in the same dynamic, and they shared the same dynamic and raised their daughter the same way. In neither case was the spanking a 'kink'. As a matter of fact, there was no bdsm involved at all....their 'play' or sex was strictly vanilla.


I'm curious as to why you say that there was no bdsm involved? It appears to me that there is discipline, dominance, and submission in a relationship of that nature, no?




CreativeDominant -> RE: Taken in Hand relationships (1/8/2007 7:26:17 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mbes

quote:

ORIGINAL: adaddysgirl
i once belonged to a DD group where there was a couple, both around 39 yrs old at the time. Her father was a Minister and she grew up in a DD household, where the mother deferred to the father and spanking was used as a form of discipline, for both her and the mother, and not for kink. She married a guy who was raised in the same dynamic, and they shared the same dynamic and raised their daughter the same way. In neither case was the spanking a 'kink'. As a matter of fact, there was no bdsm involved at all....their 'play' or sex was strictly vanilla.


I'm curious as to why you say that there was no bdsm involved? It appears to me that there is discipline, dominance, and submission in a relationship of that nature, no?


Because those are the principals of D/s.  BDSM, while it includes for many the D/s portion within the acronym, is made distinct by many people as the "play" or "scene" portion of their D/s-BDSM relationship.  For many, you can have Bondage, Discipline, Sadism, Masochism without ever coming near D/s.




mbes -> RE: Taken in Hand relationships (1/8/2007 9:59:50 AM)

Thanks for the answer.
I wrap all the letters up in one big ball of wax, and forget that not everyone does so.
But even taking out the d/s, that still leaves discipline, does it not?
While I can be argumentative, in this case I'm still wondering what the difference is? Or if there really is one?




CreativeDominant -> RE: Taken in Hand relationships (1/8/2007 12:19:31 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mbes

Thanks for the answer.
I wrap all the letters up in one big ball of wax, and forget that not everyone does so.
But even taking out the d/s, that still leaves discipline, does it not?
While I can be argumentative, in this case I'm still wondering what the difference is? Or if there really is one?


Well...to me there seems to be a certain aspect of dominance and submission so D/s is covered.  But from what I can tell from my readings on the site given, there is no Bondage, no Sadism, and no Masochism.  The Discipline...mainly in the form of corporal punishment and that mainly in the form of spanking...is there to enforce adherence to the rules and principles of the TIH relationship and not for any sexuality.

Since my take may be wrong given my newness to this subject, if there is someone more enlightened than I about this subject matter or someone with experience in it out there, could you please help to clarify this for me?




adaddysgirl -> RE: Taken in Hand relationships (1/8/2007 7:39:40 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant

Well...to me there seems to be a certain aspect of dominance and submission so D/s is covered.  But from what I can tell from my readings on the site given, there is no Bondage, no Sadism, and no Masochism.  The Discipline...mainly in the form of corporal punishment and that mainly in the form of spanking...is there to enforce adherence to the rules and principles of the TIH relationship and not for any sexuality.

Since my take may be wrong given my newness to this subject, if there is someone more enlightened than I about this subject matter or someone with experience in it out there, could you please help to clarify this for me?


i think you have it right CD.   i guess i mostly forget that others mean more than BD SM when i use the term BDSM.  Yes, TiH does involve a D/s relationship but in many case no BD SM.  Quite honestly, i'm not so sure how bondage and discipline came to be clumped together in the first place.  i mean, some can be into discipline without bondage, and vice versa, no?  But since it's an already established coupling, it's kind of hard to use one term without the other. 
 
As for myself, when i was disciplined, i was not 'bondaged' except for the rare times it was going to be so severe that my partner did not want the distraction of me trying to get away (afterall, i'm not a masochist  [:D])  But there was no sexual element to the bondage in those cases......noooooo!
 
Now for me, i like the kink and bondage during play.....so it has not been easy to find a partner in that lifestyle.  But i know there are others out there like me too so i really don't worry about it.  It's funny....when i was bondaged for play, it was usually coupled with blindfolding, a flogging, and lots of kinky sex play.  Didn't see any discipline in that....lol.
 
i think you gave some great answers here CD.  i hope mbes' questions were answered too.
 
DG




speednut -> RE: Taken in Hand relationships (1/8/2007 7:56:36 PM)

oops, wandered in thinking it was a thread on masterbation, I really need to read more.




Page: [1] 2   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125