marieToo
Posts: 3595
Joined: 5/21/2006 From: Jersey Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: mistoferin I was corresponding with a Dominant the other day and in the course of conversation I found that our interests were far, far apart. He was not local and was not relocatable. I am also not relocatable. He is into being primarily a "bedroom Top". I'm a round the clock kind of gal. His S&M interests were along the lines of spankings and such but "no heavy pain stuff". I'm a masochist. Etc, etc. When I told him that I didn't think that we were enough of a match to really pursue it farther he seemed to want to push it. Ultimately, his response was along the lines of "I can't believe you won't go out with me because I won't set you on fire." So question.....if you find that your interests are far apart with someone....would you continue to pursue it? In a case like you describe here erin, no, I would not pursue it. There at too many things (major things like location issues) that just wouldnt make it do-able. However, if there are alot of things that align with mine, and I feel a particular chemistry or energy exhange with the person, Im not going to reject the possibility of something developing because he has certain kinks or likes/dislikes that I do not share. There are alot of things I could overcome, just as vanilla people engage in relationships when one loves the ballet and the opera and the other loves poker and baseball games. Conversely everything can align in a practical sense; location, kink, interests etc, but chemistry can be absent. Thats enough reason for me to reject it also. I have found that some people lead completely with their heart and others lead completely from place of 'practicality'. Its really all about a person's priorities and what they place the highest value on in their relationship pursuits. For myself personally, it would depend on how vast the differences were and how much (if any) chemistry I was feeling with the person.
_____________________________
marie. I give good agita.
|