RE: Protective Of Subs: The Game Exposed (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


gretchenS -> RE: Protective Of Subs: The Game Exposed (11/29/2006 2:57:42 PM)

Mmmm...

He might be a very confused person too. His profile states he is a dominant male actively seeking submissive women and loves CBT...¿?


Edited to add: If I had ten years of experience, I think I would already know the answer to his question...




marieToo -> RE: Protective Of Subs: The Game Exposed (11/29/2006 3:02:28 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hardspanker44

I have noticed an unsual protocol in the lifestyle.  Here is the usual scenario, there is a very sexy picture in the profile and a notice they want to have friends but they are currently owned by a Dom and they are happy and dont want to be castled for it.  Sound reasonable?  It is to a point, but I am wondering, does it really meet the test of authenticity.  When does a Dom become the conflict resolution secretary for a Subbie who broadcasts her affiliations and couples that with a sexy picture; inviting as she does attention from men.  There is the underpinning that she doesnt want to have friends who are attracted to her sexy picture; and that her Dom can then act some crazy scenario of dominance and protection.  Probably it would be better for the Dom to have her take the picture down, and simply let her answer whatever.  Afterall, There is no such thing as complete absolute slaves or submissives.  It is against the law and nobody has the right to determine what you read or do with your life.  A slave should come from the perspective of healthy mental attitude, maturity, and  a genuine dedication.  It should not be alot of drama and controlling by the Dom.  A Master does not control by giving alot of rules and restrictions; a Good Master rules by nature of who he is and what he stands for.  Often times the slave is learning about life or simply wants to have another in charge.  Either way, one has to be careful about doing things that are healthy.  And loud caveats and billboard size signs about your DOM are so much BS and reflects a very caddy approach.  The best way to announce such a relationship is simply say it as it is.  A More conservative picture is good.  I have written scores of emails to people onthis chat without the least idea about a relationship beyond a chat once in a while.  Afterall I cannot presume that one could really have a relationship with someone who is so ruled bound. lol  In my humble opinion.


In reading your post, I see several points that Im interpreting.  Firstly, Im not sure its necessarily "protocol" to have a particular type of profile--it could be just someone's personal taste or choice or what they see as sexy, classy or whatever other characteristic they choose to display.  I have certain turn offs when I see certain photos or read certain profiles, but I guess the entire world isnt interested in what you or I, or Joe Blow think about their photo or profile.  They are interested more in presenting what they chose to present, because afterall, who could please everyone's taste, even if they wanted to?

Secondly as far as authenticity.  Unless you get to know someone, either in chat, in person or read their stuff on the boards, its kind of hard to know if they are authentic or not.  It's kind of like seeing a can with a label on it and the label says Carrots, but you dont know if there is really string beans inside.  There are people out here in cyberland who will completely fabricate a persona, claim to be owned, talk like they belong to someone and actually never have had a day of rt experience in their lives. 
Thirdly there are some people who like to validate their relationship or show it off so to speak.  So maybe that can be the case in some of the profiles where you see the Doms allowing or desiring that their sub post a sexy photo while having his name written on her forehead (I am speaking figuratively), but what Im saying its a form of "look at me...look at whom Im with, or look at who owns me, or look at who I own".  It's not much different than some people would view the announcement of an engagement, say, or call a friend and say "Im dating so and so".  Except that its in a profile.

As far as the drama, the rules and all the other things you state should or shouldnt be  a part of a relationship...well...you're not right or wrong.   It can be whatever works for that couple or trio or whathaveyou.  The "rulebound" thing...eh...some get off on it, others need it...others reject it yet.  It takes all kinds....I think the important thing is that you surround yourself with those who suit you, those you like, those whose beliefs align with yours etc.  The stuff you dont like or respect...can be weeded out, with little or no effort by simply skipping over their profiles etc.  It takes all kinds...and it's a big can with alotta mixed nuts....pick out what you like...




orfunboi -> RE: Protective Of Subs: The Game Exposed (11/29/2006 3:14:37 PM)

Why are you so concerned with other people's profiles and the pic they choose to display? [8|]




Pixiepunk -> RE: Protective Of Subs: The Game Exposed (11/29/2006 4:05:54 PM)

Where can I get a come hiter burka?
sounds fun....[:D]




LTRsubNW -> RE: Protective Of Subs: The Game Exposed (11/29/2006 4:06:29 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hardspanker44

I have noticed an unsual protocol in the lifestyle.  Here is the usual scenario, there is a very sexy picture in the profile and a notice they want to have friends but they are currently owned by a Dom and they are happy and dont want to be castled for it.  Sound reasonable?  It is to a point, but I am wondering, does it really meet the test of authenticity.  When does a Dom become the conflict resolution secretary for a Subbie who broadcasts her affiliations and couples that with a sexy picture; inviting as she does attention from men.  There is the underpinning that she doesnt want to have friends who are attracted to her sexy picture; and that her Dom can then act some crazy scenario of dominance and protection.  Probably it would be better for the Dom to have her take the picture down, and simply let her answer whatever.  Afterall, There is no such thing as complete absolute slaves or submissives.  It is against the law and nobody has the right to determine what you read or do with your life.  A slave should come from the perspective of healthy mental attitude, maturity, and  a genuine dedication.  It should not be alot of drama and controlling by the Dom.  A Master does not control by giving alot of rules and restrictions; a Good Master rules by nature of who he is and what he stands for.  Often times the slave is learning about life or simply wants to have another in charge.  Either way, one has to be careful about doing things that are healthy.  And loud caveats and billboard size signs about your DOM are so much BS and reflects a very caddy approach.  The best way to announce such a relationship is simply say it as it is.  A More conservative picture is good.  I have written scores of emails to people onthis chat without the least idea about a relationship beyond a chat once in a while.  Afterall I cannot presume that one could really have a relationship with someone who is so ruled bound. lol  In my humble opinion.


One word:

Paragraphs.




Quivver -> RE: Protective Of Subs: The Game Exposed (11/29/2006 4:32:05 PM)

Sigh, another self appointed Profile Natzi...........  [:'(]




cjenny -> RE: Protective Of Subs: The Game Exposed (11/29/2006 4:37:17 PM)

Oh great. Now I'm all paranoid about my profile and pic!




briska -> RE: Protective Of Subs: The Game Exposed (11/29/2006 5:40:49 PM)

Asking why a woman would put up a sexy picture of herself if she doesn't want to be harassed is, imho, alot like asking why someone would wear a short skirt if they weren't looking for sexual attention.

Because we want to, and it makes us feel good. How about that? *gross overgeneralization warning* When men learn to control themselves from thinking everything and everyone belongs to them, then maybe women can not feel bad about trying to feel/look good for no other reason than it makes them happy. */gross overgeneralization* I mean, really, who wants to put up an ugly picture of themselves on the internet?




TemptingNviceSub -> RE: Protective Of Subs: The Game Exposed (11/29/2006 7:52:33 PM)

Dear Spanky..if you see such as a game, then you should just avoid playing the game! right?....nuff said...[;)]......Tempting




MmakeMme -> RE: Protective Of Subs: The Game Exposed (11/30/2006 3:13:14 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: RiotGirl

He isnt getting laid Julia and he's exposing why its everyone elses fault.  


~choke~

DAMMIT! And that was the last of the coffee too ...................




eyesopened -> RE: Protective Of Subs: The Game Exposed (11/30/2006 3:19:53 AM)

Maybe the OP could look at a few profiles without pics??




BeingChewsie -> RE: Protective Of Subs: The Game Exposed (11/30/2006 6:23:24 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hardspanker44

I have noticed an unsual protocol in the lifestyle.  Here is the usual scenario, there is a very sexy picture in the profile and a notice they want to have friends but they are currently owned by a Dom and they are happy and dont want to be castled for it.  Sound reasonable?  It is to a point, but I am wondering, does it really meet the test of authenticity.  When does a Dom become the conflict resolution secretary for a Subbie who broadcasts her affiliations and couples that with a sexy picture; inviting as she does attention from men.  There is the underpinning that she doesnt want to have friends who are attracted to her sexy picture; and that her Dom can then act some crazy scenario of dominance and protection.  Probably it would be better for the Dom to have her take the picture down, and simply let her answer whatever.  Afterall, There is no such thing as complete absolute slaves or submissives.  It is against the law and nobody has the right to determine what you read or do with your life.  A slave should come from the perspective of healthy mental attitude, maturity, and  a genuine dedication.  It should not be alot of drama and controlling by the Dom.  A Master does not control by giving alot of rules and restrictions; a Good Master rules by nature of who he is and what he stands for.  Often times the slave is learning about life or simply wants to have another in charge.  Either way, one has to be careful about doing things that are healthy.  And loud caveats and billboard size signs about your DOM are so much BS and reflects a very caddy approach.  The best way to announce such a relationship is simply say it as it is.  A More conservative picture is good.  I have written scores of emails to people onthis chat without the least idea about a relationship beyond a chat once in a while.  Afterall I cannot presume that one could really have a relationship with someone who is so ruled bound. lol  In my humble opinion.


Afterall there is no such thing as murder..no such thing as drug trafficking..because it is illegal.

Laws are reactive to, not prescriptive of reality.

Laws do not determnine the existencce/occurence of things.





Fawne -> RE: Protective Of Subs: The Game Exposed (11/30/2006 9:08:01 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Pixiepunk

Where can I get a come hither burka?
sounds fun....[:D]


Why Pixie, I am certain there are fine Dominants here skilled in knife play who could use a burka cloth and  design - right on the model -  quite an alluring, sexy outfit ! [;)]




yourMissTress -> RE: Protective Of Subs: The Game Exposed (11/30/2006 9:29:46 AM)

My sub has had plenty of sexy pictures of herself on her profile, several without any clothing at all.  Because, I love her body and think it's beautiful and wouldn't want to deprive anyone of seeing such magnificence. 
She gets tons of emails from both men and women who are either complimentary or rude.  I have never responded to a single one of them.  I haven't needed to, and don't imagine I ever will, it's email
Get a grip!  If you really want drama, there's plenty of real drama out there.





juliaoceania -> RE: Protective Of Subs: The Game Exposed (11/30/2006 9:36:51 AM)

Spanky,

Have you been emailing collared submissives without reading their profile and receiving nasty emails from protective doms? It makes me wonder, if you were on a beach, and a woman was wearing a string bikini and a wedding ring, would you feel it was ok to go up to her and ask her to have a beer with you? Would you find it strange if her husband came up and told you to leave his wife alone? Just curious




CreativeDominant -> RE: Protective Of Subs: The Game Exposed (11/30/2006 2:44:41 PM)

Yanno...I really wish I had something to add to this but I think almost all the good answers have been given to you. 

Every time I log on to collarme, there is a different submissive profile waiting to greet me.  I've yet to read through one and compare the profile to the picture to make sure that the "innocence level" of their pic matched the details given in their profile (scrutinize it, in shorter terms).  If a collared submissive/slave wants to put a naked picture of herself on her profile, who am I to decide that a "collared submissive" shouldn't do that?  If a submissive who wants "friends only", uncollared or not, wants to put a picture that pushes the TOS to the extreme edge then who am I to tell her she cannot or should not or state that she's a tease?

I've got two female unmentionables.  I've seen them in pretty skimpy outfits.  That's their choice.  Now...if they ask me whether or not a particular outfit would go over well at a particular place, then I am going to tell them what I think the people in that place may think, based on my knowledge of similar people.  But I would no more tell one of my unmentionables that "you're just asking to be raped in that outfit" then I'd tell her to flap her arms and fly to the moon.  Though I respond very much to the visual, I am not one of those guys who believes that any girl in a short skirt must be looking for me to put my hand up it. 




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
3.100586E-02