|
Lordandmaster -> RE: NFL Sob (or Brag) Thread (12/2/2007 1:03:58 PM)
|
Sorry, but that comparison makes no sense. A six-year span doesn't tell the whole story. Oh, and Jerry Rice had the best year that any receiver has ever had...and it was in his 11th year. Look it up; it was 1995. Absolutely he could have bested the year that Moss is having now in his 10th season. Randy Moss is a great receiver, a blue-chip Hall of Famer, but he played like shit in Oakland because he just didn't feel like trying. It wasn't JUST because he was on a lousy team. That disqualifies him for sure in the debate over the best receiver of all time. quote:
ORIGINAL: cloudboy Here is the comparison: First Six Years in the League: Rice: 446 rec.; 7,866 yds.; 17.6 avg.; 79 TDs Moss: 525 rec.; 8,375 yds.; 15.9 avg.; 77 TDs Statistically each is phenomenal. I'd have to say its a toss up to decide who is better than the other. In this comparison model Moss does hold a candle to Jerry Rice. They are, in fact, equal peers. Rice has a slight edge in TDs and yards per catch, but Moss has more rec's and more overall rec. yds. Looking at these STATs and having seen OAK play in 05 and 06, its no wonder Moss is a new man in NE. I don't believe Jerry Rice in his 10nth season could best the year Moss is having.
|
|
|
|