|
gypsygrl -> RE: Thoughts on service (10/11/2006 9:47:25 AM)
|
Ok, good. These comments hit home some. BitaTruble, yeah, that's kind of where I got to in my thinking and I'm very big on permission and trying not to assume I can tell what another person needs or impose myself on them. But only do things for someone when they request it. This, actually, is how I prefer to be treated and it helps me with the feelings of dependency. Rayne58, I want to say, yeah! thats the way it should be, but I'm not sure I could deal with it so gracefully. I mean I can see the logic there, but thats different from feeling the feeling. Littlepita, thats exactly the sort of sadist I'm talking about. If not allowed to carry groceries, I could see my self flapping my arms, stomping my feet and going into a good long, if silent and internal, temper tantrum. LuckyAlbatross, I agree that for me, its a way of deflecting attention while at the same time maintaining positive connection. I'm not sure how it relates to a sub giving up authority over her own pleasure, though. Are you saying that in not wanting to be served, I'm maintaining control over how others please me by simply not allowing it or resisting it? MasterFireMaam, I was raised to be independant and more or less self-sufficient and in my adult life its those qualities that seems to attract people to me so, making do for myself is one way I've learned to please people. This goes back to my childhood, but it was also a factor when I was married with my ex-husband. Of course, there's something brutal about this: if I didn't need anything, he didn't have to give anything. I also have the hostess thing and I have to be really careful because guys, vanilla or otherwise, think that just because I'm nice to them, I like them or something and Dominants do confuse attentiveness and other service oriented qualities with submission. And, I'm like, I'm not necessarily submitting I'm just like that with pretty much everyone unless I have a reason not to be. Its my default mode. Even as I was breaking up with a previous Dominant I was involved with, I still got him drinks when he indicated he wanted them and stuff like that so he thought there was still a chance. I had to work really hard to act in a way consistant with break-up mode. MyNameisMaam, yes, it is a strange balance: to serve everyone but to require little service yourself. I think it goes back to being able to maintain a connection while maintaining independance. toservez, I feel really bad when someone cleans up after me. I take it as an instant commentary that I'm slacking and at a dinner party, its like I failed in being a proper guest. I like to be able to help clean up, but I try not to be a pain about it especially since when I'm the hostess (which is rare) I like to work by myself. MzMinx, I'm getting some insight from your comments into how it might work from 'the other side' of the D/s M/s coin. I agree, it is about intimacy and choosing who accesses that intimate space gypsylee, yes! Ok, so, yeah, there is a close relationship between service and control. It feels kind of like cheating to me, or striking a nefarious bargain, because typically, in serving I can keep my distance and not risk intimacy while at the same time getting the positives favor. I don't think I've ever used service to control someone else, at least not in the recent past, but I have been on the receiving end of that kind of dynamic.
|
|
|
|