quote:

Democrats rigged the maps to maximize their share of Congressional seats. It is absolutely justified for us to do it too.

Republican voters (top numbers) vs. their Congressional Representation (bottom numbers)

California:
40% of the statewide vote
17% of the seats (9 out of 52)

Massachusetts:
35% of the statewide vote
0% of the seats (0 out of 9)

Connecticut:
38% of the statewide vote
0% of the seats (0 out of 5)

New York:
42% of the statewide vote
26.9% of the seats (7 out of 26)

New Jersey:
43% of the statewide vote
25% of the seats (3 out of 12)

Maryland:
38% of the statewide vote
12% of the seats (1 out of 8)

New Mexico:
44% of the statewide vote
0% of the seats (0 out of 3)

Hawaii:
30% of the statewide vote
0% of the seats (0 out of 2)

Oregon:
42% of the statewide vote
16% of the seats (1 out of 6)

Washington:
38% of the statewide vote
20% of the seats (2 out of 10)

Rhode Island:
38% of the statewide vote
0% of the seats (0 out of 2)

https://x.com/EndWokeness/status/1950579893395239120



1. CaliforniaClaim: 40% of statewide vote, 17% of seats (9 out of 52).
Analysis: California has 52 congressional districts. 17% of 52 is approximately 8.84, rounded to 9 seats. The 40% vote share aligns with historical Republican performance in California House elections. In 2022, Republicans won 9 seats (17.3% of 52) despite Democrats dominating due to urban concentration (Los Angeles Times, 2025-07-25). The 2024 NPR live results and Reuters data suggest a similar split, with Republicans holding around 9-10 seats despite a competitive vote share, reflecting the independent Citizens Redistricting Commission’s maps. The 40% figure is plausible if it aggregates 2024 House votes, where Republicans often polled 35-40% statewide (e.g., 2020 presidential vote was 34.3% for Trump). Verdict: Likely accurate, within a 1-2% margin for vote share.

2. MassachusettsClaim: 35% of statewide vote, 0% of seats (0 out of 9).
Analysis: Massachusetts has 9 districts. The 0% seat claim matches the 2024 delegation, with all 9 seats held by Democrats (NPR, 2025-07-29). The 35% vote share is consistent with Republican performance in recent elections; in 2020, Trump received 32.1% of the presidential vote, and 2022 House votes showed a similar trend. The Democracy Journal (2023-09-14) notes Republicans get about a third of the vote but no seats due to winner-take-all dynamics and Democratic-leaning redistricting. Verdict: Accurate, though vote share may edge toward 32-38% based on historical data.

3. ConnecticutClaim: 38% of statewide vote, 0% of seats (0 out of 5).
Analysis: Connecticut has 5 districts, all Democratic in 2024 (NPR, 2025-07-29). The 38% vote share aligns with Republican trends; in 2020, Trump got 39.2%, and 2022 House votes hovered around 35-40%. Redistricting by the Democratic-controlled legislature (Ballotpedia) likely packed Republican voters into uncompetitive districts. Verdict: Accurate, with vote share possibly ranging 35-40%.

4. New YorkClaim: 42% of statewide vote, 26.9% of seats (7 out of 26).
Analysis: New York has 26 districts. 26.9% of 26 is about 7 seats, matching the 2024 Republican delegation (NPR, 2025-07-29). The 42% vote share fits 2020 (Trump: 37.7%) and 2024 House trends, though the independent redistricting commission’s maps (post-2021 court adjustments) limit Republican gains. The Washington Post (2021-09-27) notes Democrats could gerrymander but haven’t aggressively, suggesting the 42% reflects fair vote distribution. Verdict: Accurate, with vote share potentially 38-42%.

5. New JerseyClaim: 43% of statewide vote, 25% of seats (3 out of 12).
Analysis: New Jersey has 12 districts. 25% of 12 is 3 seats, aligning with the 2024 Republican count (NPR, 2025-07-29). The 43% vote share is consistent with 2020 (Trump: 41.4%) and 2022 House votes. The state’s redistricting commission (nonpartisan but politically balanced) may underrepresent this vote share, a point raised in POLITICO (2025-07-26). Verdict: Accurate, vote share possibly 40-43%.

6. MarylandClaim: 38% of statewide vote, 12% of seats (1 out of 8).
Analysis: Maryland has 8 districts. 12% of 8 is 0.96, rounded to 1 seat, matching the 2024 Republican delegation (NPR, 2025-07-29). The 38% vote share fits 2020 (Trump: 32.2%, with House votes slightly higher). Democratic gerrymandering is well-documented (Brennan Center, 2024-09-24), explaining the disparity. Verdict: Accurate, vote share possibly 35-38%.

7. New MexicoClaim: 44% of statewide vote, 0% of seats (0 out of 3).
Analysis: New Mexico has 3 districts, all Democratic in 2024 (NPR, 2025-07-29). The 44% vote share is high but plausible; in 2020, Trump got 43.5%, and 2022 House votes were close. Democratic control and rural-urban splits likely nullify Republican representation. Verdict: Accurate, vote share may range 42-45%.

8. HawaiiClaim: 30% of statewide vote, 0% of seats (0 out of 2).
Analysis: Hawaii has 2 districts, both Democratic in 2024 (NPR, 2025-07-29). The 30% vote share aligns with 2020 (Trump: 29.7%) and 2022 trends. The small, urban-heavy state favors Democrats, limiting Republican seats. Verdict: Accurate, vote share possibly 28-32%.

9. OregonClaim: 42% of statewide vote, 16% of seats (1 out of 6).
Analysis: Oregon has 6 districts. 16% of 6 is 0.96, rounded to 1 seat, matching the 2024 Republican count (NPR, 2025-07-29). The 42% vote share fits 2020 (Trump: 40.4%) and 2022 House votes. The Democratic-leaning redistricting (AP, 2021-09-04) explains the gap. Verdict: Accurate, vote share possibly 40-42%.

10. WashingtonClaim: 38% of statewide vote, 20% of seats (2 out of 10).
Analysis: Washington has 10 districts. 20% of 10 is 2 seats, matching the 2024 Republican delegation (NPR, 2025-07-29). The 38% vote share aligns with 2020 (Trump: 38.8%) and 2022 trends. The nonpartisan commission’s maps limit Republican gains. Verdict: Accurate, vote share possibly 36-38%.

11. Rhode IslandClaim: 38% of statewide vote, 0% of seats (0 out of 2).
Analysis: Rhode Island has 2 districts, both Democratic in 2024 (NPR, 2025-07-29). The 38% vote share fits 2020 (Trump: 38.6%) and 2022 House votes. Democratic dominance and small size explain the 0% seat share. Verdict: Accurate, vote share possibly 36-39%.

Counter-Examples from X ThreadThe reply by @rm041923
provides Republican-leaning states (e.g., Tennessee, Alabama) where Democrats get 30-40% of the vote but 0-16% of seats, mirroring the original post’s pattern. This symmetry supports the idea that gerrymandering is bipartisan, as noted in the Brennan Center (2024-09-24) and Wikipedia (2025-03-11), with gaps of +14.4% to +40% favoring the majority party.Overall AssessmentAccuracy: The numbers are largely accurate based on 2024 election outcomes, 2020-2022 trends, and post-2020 redistricting effects. Vote shares (30-44%) are within 2-3% of historical and projected 2024 data, reflecting two-party vote aggregates. Seat percentages (0-26.9%) match NPR and Reuters 2024 delegations, consistent with gerrymandered maps drawn by Democratic legislatures.
Limitations: Exact 2024 vote shares aren’t fully available, so reliance on 2020-2022 data adjusted for redistricting introduces minor uncertainty. Mid-decade redistricting (e.g., Texas proposal) could alter 2026 outcomes, but the post focuses on current (2024) representations.
Supporting Evidence: The Brennan Center (2024-09-24) estimates gerrymandering shifted 16 seats in 2024, with Democratic states like California etc

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX
Let's talk about that.

quote:


California:
40% of the statewide vote

quote:


Massachusetts:
35% of the statewide vote
0% of the seats (0 out of 9)

quote:


Connecticut:
38% of the statewide vote
0% of the seats (0 out of 5)

quote:


New York:
42% of the statewide vote
26.9% of the seats (7 out of 26)

quote:


New Jersey:
43% of the statewide vote
25% of the seats (3 out of 12)

quote:


New Mexico:
44% of the statewide vote
0% of the seats (0 out of 3)

quote:


Hawaii:
30% of the statewide vote
0% of the seats (0 out of 2)

quote:


Oregon:
42% of the statewide vote
16% of the seats (1 out of 6)

quote:


Washington:
38% of the statewide vote
20% of the seats (2 out of 10)

quote:


Rhode Island:
38% of the statewide vote
0% of the seats (0 out of 2)

quote:


https://x.com/EndWokeness/status/1950579893395239120

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01

B-B-B-B-B-B-But... It's on X!!!!

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


You are confusing percentage of statewide votes with numbers of registered Republicans.

Try to understand this - it's very simple: The number of votes a party gets shows how much support it has.

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01

B-B-B-B-B-B-But... It's on X!!!!

JUST for the California data -

Los Angeles Times, 2025-07-25, The 2024 NPR live results and Reuters data, the independent Citizens Redistricting Commission’s maps

You are trained to hate real news and information because you are in a cult.

quote:

The 40% vote share aligns with historical Republican performance in California House elections. In 2022, Republicans won 9 seats (17.3% of 52) despite Democrats dominating due to urban concentration (Los Angeles Times, 2025-07-25). The 2024 NPR live results and Reuters data suggest a similar split, with Republicans holding around 9-10 seats despite a competitive vote share, reflecting the independent Citizens Redistricting Commission’s maps. The 40% figure is plausible if it aggregates 2024 House votes, where Republicans often polled 35-40% statewide (e.g., 2020 presidential vote was 34.3% for Trump). Verdict: Likely accurate, within a 1-2% margin for vote share.

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01

Registrations are a FARRRRRRRRR more accurate KPI then this stupid guessing.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

In the REAL world, actual votes cast means everything.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


Two movies, one screen.

I see the facts, you see what you want to see

Your cult doesn't gerrymander, regardless of the massive overwhelming proof that it clearly does

quote:

Rasmussen Reports @Rasmussen_Poll

Is requiring photo ID to vote a reasonable measure to protect the integrity of elections?

YES-
All: 73%
Men: 69%
Women: 76%
18-29: 70%
30-39: 70%
40-49: 80%
50-64: 77%
65+: 67%
White: 73%
Black: 70%
Hispanic: 69%
Other: 83%
DEM: 64%
IND: 69%
GOP: 86%

https://x.com/Rasmussen_Poll/status/1951993183677694140

quote:

Obama’s Wingman: Texas congressional redistricting is different than the countless other times it’s been done, because this time it’s a Threat To Our Democracy

https://x.com/WesternLensman/status/1952042448513061004

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


Texas Democrats bravely ran away to make a stand in hiding today. They are bravely defending democracy by running away and thereby derailing the constitutional process...

They ran away bravely to Illinois because Gerrymandering

https://x.com/MissinRoyko/status/1952361553031778505

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01

They are definitely defending democracy from blatant partisanship by denying a quorum.

We need to amend the constitution and take all federal elections away from the states.

Make ALL House seats "At Large", and THEN once all the seats are filled they can be assigned districts.
(Alaska does this already)

Solves gerrymandering once and for all regardless of party.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01

They are definitely defending democracy from blatant partisanship by denying a quorum.

We need to amend the constitution and take all federal elections away from the states.

Make ALL House seats "At Large", and THEN once all the seats are filled they can be assigned districts.
(Alaska does this already)

Solves gerrymandering once and for all regardless of party.

In the same post in which you tacitly admit that both sides do it, you claim they are defending democracy from partisanship

...by thwarting the democratic process

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


I see - "It's (D)ifferent, when WE do it."

Blue states are all gerrymandered to the max so...

Such faux outrage on your part only serves to further illustrate how you and everyone in your cult are massive hypocrites

Your cult declared war on American voters a very long time ago, so you'll just have to excuse us normal Americans as we finally begin to fight fire with fire

Indicting your cult leaders, deporting your illegal voters, cleaning up your voter rolls, defunding your USAID-funded "news & infotainment" programs and your violent color revolutionaries...

All of it, and unapologetically - 100%

Kathy Hochul - "We are at war".

https://x.com/GuntherEagleman/status/1952389706999578841

Your declaring war on us is not new. Us finally responding in kind, IS new.

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01

And that goes for ANYONE who does it.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01

And that goes for ANYONE who does it.

Your cult has declared war on the American people, so...

All is fair.

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01

And of course you keep forgetting (because you are in a cult)

I don't have a cult. You do.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01

And of course you keep forgetting (because you are in a cult)

I don't have a cult. You do.

You are a war pig cult, with a Vladimir Putin under every bed. You are a "defund the police" cult, and only your White guilt leaders want the police eliminated - the poor and minorities certainly don't.

quote:


Your cult steals elections, power & wealth and then accuses normal people of doing what you do.

quote:

Your cult rallied around a man who CLEARLY suffered from advanced dementia, and chanted that all is well.

quote:

Your cult imports terrorists and criminal gang members, literally riots in support of Hamas. Your cult accuses all White people of being evil colonizers and racists - when YOU are the racists. Obviously.

quote:

I could go on, though your blindness makes it pointless for me to do so.