RE: Will we be seeing the Jeffrey Epstein files soon?

RE: Will we be seeing the Jeffrey Epstein files soon? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

MasterJaguar01 -> RE: Will we be seeing the Jeffrey Epstein files soon? (7/23/2025 12:38:37 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01 quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX quote: ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01 How can anyone name anything specific about something they haven't seen? I appreciate your finally admitting that you preach out of sheer ignorance. Carry on. Of all the stupid fcking ad hominem attacks this one is probably the most idiotic. The 302's. The FBI interviews need to be released. (Not the Grand Jury testimony. Not some bullshit that Ghislane Maxwell is paid to say. The 302's) The Democrats and Thomas Massie pushed to release the 302's* All the pedo Republicans chose to protect the pedophiles. You and your Republican Pedo cult are protecting the Pedophiles. The crimes if Epstein are so heinous. BOTTOM LINE: Democrats are pushing hard to telase the information and shed light on possible conspirators, accomplices Republicans are fighting tooth and nail to cover it up. "Nothing to see here!" Go hate Obama because he was briefed on an FBI investivation!

BoscoX -> RE: Will we be seeing the Jeffrey Epstein files soon? (7/24/2025 3:58:29 AM)
Your cult had all of the so-called "Epstein files" for eight years. "Such an odd time. At precisely the moment we learn definitively that the premise of the biggest hysteria of Trump I was false, some of the same people who stoked it are hard at work spinning up a new hysteria for Trump II." - Byron York

BoscoX -> RE: Will we be seeing the Jeffrey Epstein files soon? (7/24/2025 6:36:54 AM)
Fast Reply - “Unverified hearsay” is what Trump is up against now? (WSJ reporting those words). Outrageous attempt to create a narrative where no credible evidence exists on Epstein. Same thing happened on Russia. Dems creating alternate & false reality. - Scott Jennings Video here: https://x.com/ScottJenningsKY/status/1948330734642409935

wickedsdesires -> RE: Will we be seeing the Jeffrey Epstein files soon? (7/24/2025 8:30:04 AM)
Boscox explain this please US House speaker shuts down chamber to block Epstein vote https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cgjg9j0l7j9o US House of Representatives Speaker Mike Johnson has announced an early adjournment of the chamber, stalling efforts to force the release of documents related to disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein. The move delays a politically fraught vote on the matter until September amid growing bipartisan pressure for transparency. It followed a key committee vote to subpoena Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein's long time associate, to testify before Congress. (The committee also voted 8:2. Five democrats voted yes and three Republicans on the committee voted with the Democrats) ----- White House pushes back after reports Trump is named in Epstein files https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cwyq921zqqzo The White House has pushed back after reports that US President Donald Trump was told in May that he was among hundreds of names mentioned in justice department documents relating to late convicted paedophile financier Jeffrey Epstein. The Wall Street Journal said the president was informed of the fact by Attorney General Pam Bondi during a routine briefing. ----- While campaigning for the presidency last year, Trump had promised to release such files about the well-connected sex offender. But his supporters have since grown frustrated with the administration's handling of the issue, including its failure to deliver a rumoured "client list" of Epstein. In a memo earlier this month, the justice department and FBI said there was no such list. That is some of many factual links I can do Boscox unlike your lying shit. I could include the witnesses speaking out about Trump and all those photograph's trump with Epstein and women, including flying on Epsteins jet at least 7 times the Lolita express its nicknamed. (Watch: "It's exhausting" - Epstein accuser talks to the BBC about files saga) ----- Release all the fucking files, all of them not the last shitty court case because there wont be too much in those ones but trump sure the fuck is. Anyhoos Boscox it looks to me and anyone with a brain that Trump doesn't want those files released. If Trump isnt in them, and if trump has nothing to hide why arent they all getting released then?

BoscoX -> RE: Will we be seeing the Jeffrey Epstein files soon? (7/26/2025 8:43:12 AM)
WSJ Reveals Trump Once Wrote 'BOOBS' On A Calculator And Showed It To Epstein https://buff.ly/Nz5wjBQ

MasterJaguar01 -> RE: Will we be seeing the Jeffrey Epstein files soon? (7/26/2025 8:57:21 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX WSJ Reveals Trump Once Wrote 'BOOBS' On A Calculator And Showed It To Epstein https://buff.ly/Nz5wjBQ A nonsensical distraction. BOTTOM LINE: Democrats are pushing hard to telase the information and shed light on possible conspirators, accomplices Republicans are fighting tooth and nail to cover it up. "Nothing to see here!" Go hate Obama because he was briefed on an FBI investivation!

BoscoX -> RE: Will we be seeing the Jeffrey Epstein files soon? (7/26/2025 9:01:32 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01 BOTTOM LINE: Democrats are pushing hard to telase the information and shed light on possible conspirators, accomplices Wrong again. The REAL bottom line - Your cult held "the files" for eight long years.

MasterJaguar01 -> RE: Will we be seeing the Jeffrey Epstein files soon? (7/26/2025 9:57:48 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX quote: ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01 BOTTOM LINE: Democrats are pushing hard to telase the information and shed light on possible conspirators, accomplices Wrong again. The REAL bottom line - Your cult held "the files" for eight long years. 1. I don't have a cult. You do 2. I would support any Democrat being prosecuted for those 8 years who kept the files from being released. Unfortunately. there are thousands of heinous crimes like this every year. The FBI doesn't just randomly release every 302 on them. If you are saying that some cult held these files and prevented their release in response to a FOIA request or legislation from Congress. Please cite that. 3. Please cite the legislation that came up for a vote (or at least submitted to the Rules committee!!!) in the Republican House during the Biden Administration calling for the files released Of course you can't cite any of this. There is no story here. No one was calling for the release of the files until the 2020 Republican cult leaders and influencers (including the AG) politicized the hell out of them in order to win an election. THE BOTTOM LINE: Democrats are pushing hard to release the information and shed light on possible conspirators, accomplices Republicans are fighting tooth and nail to cover it up. "Nothing to see here!" Go hate Obama because he was briefed on an FBI investigation

BoscoX -> RE: Will we be seeing the Jeffrey Epstein files soon? (7/26/2025 11:35:38 AM)
Your cult had "the files" for eight long years and could have released them at any time, and if there were anything negative about the president in them they WOULD have been released - obviously. I am sorry they did this to you.

BoscoX -> RE: Will we be seeing the Jeffrey Epstein files soon? (7/26/2025 12:00:51 PM)
Fast Reply - To spite the howler cult and it's mad chanting and howling? Only Trump volunteered to help prosecute Epstein. [:)] https://x.com/DefiyantlyFree/status/1949149365664154061

MasterJaguar01 -> RE: Will we be seeing the Jeffrey Epstein files soon? (7/26/2025 12:28:33 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX Your cult had "the files" for eight long years and could have released them at any time, and if there were anything negative about the president in them they WOULD have been released - obviously. I am sorry they did this to you. That is 100% false because we already know there are negative things about the president. I am sorry they did this to you.

MasterJaguar01 -> RE: Will we be seeing the Jeffrey Epstein files soon? (7/26/2025 12:37:20 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX Fast Reply - To spite the howler cult and it's mad chanting and howling? Only Trump volunteered to help prosecute Epstein. [:)] https://x.com/DefiyantlyFree/status/1949149365664154061 You keep pivoting to that irrelevant X post. He agreed to a phone conversation (NOT under oath), gave some info about Epstein, and left all details of his own involvement out. He gets a brownie point. That and $4.70 will get you a gallon of gas in this ecpnpmy.

BoscoX -> RE: Will we be seeing the Jeffrey Epstein files soon? (7/27/2025 5:05:20 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01 That is 100% false because we already know there are negative things about the president. No, sorry - there is zero proof anywhere of your wild-eyed howling. You've been hoaxed AGAIN. Neither guilt by association nor guilt by unverified hearsay mean anything,except to you and your fellow cult members.

BoscoX -> RE: Will we be seeing the Jeffrey Epstein files soon? (7/27/2025 6:06:10 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01 You keep pivoting to that irrelevant X post. That's another ad hominem fallacy btw. All your kind ever have. The VIDEO is far more relevant than all of you and your cult's desperate and baseless accusations. OLD accusations, that have been debunked hundreds of times. Literally nothing new.

MasterJaguar01 -> RE: Will we be seeing the Jeffrey Epstein files soon? (7/27/2025 6:16:21 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX quote: ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01 You keep pivoting to that irrelevant X post. That's another ad hominem fallacy btw. All your kind ever have. The VIDEO is far more relevant than all of you and your cult's desperate and baseless accusations. OLD accusations, that have been debunked hundreds of times. Literally nothing new. Stating that you keep pivoting to that irrelevant X post is straight on point. Epstein's lawyer praising trump for having a phone call with him <> releasing the Epstein files. It's irrelevant on its face, and in no way is pointing that fact out an ad hominem. Sorry.

BoscoX -> RE: Will we be seeing the Jeffrey Epstein files soon? (7/27/2025 6:54:19 AM)
You are either sadly confused or literally insane. Epstein's prosecutor crediting Trump's cooperation for Epstein's prosecution says it all Trump and Epstein were friends until Epstein's criminal predilections surfaced, and then Trump put him away Say it again - Trump put him away

MasterJaguar01 -> RE: Will we be seeing the Jeffrey Epstein files soon? (7/27/2025 7:11:10 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX You are either sadly confused or literally insane. Epstein's prosecutor crediting Trump's cooperation for Epstein's prosecution says it all Trump and Epstein were friends until Epstein's criminal predilections surfaced, and then Trump put him away Say it again - Trump put him away You are in a cult. It was a friendly phone call, not under oath. It says that our President was trying to direct blame away from himself. That is all it says.

BoscoX -> RE: Will we be seeing the Jeffrey Epstein files soon? (7/27/2025 7:32:01 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01 It was a friendly phone call, not under oath. It says that our President was trying to direct blame away from himself. That is all it says. According to the voices in your head. Is one of them Obama?

MasterJaguar01 -> RE: Will we be seeing the Jeffrey Epstein files soon? (7/27/2025 9:23:36 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX quote: ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01 It was a friendly phone call, not under oath. It says that our President was trying to direct blame away from himself. That is all it says. According to the voices in your head. Is one of them Obama? Ummm nope. According to Bradley Edwards the prosecutor. AND from your X link He is the only person who in 2009 when I served a lot of subpoenas on behalf of Epstein's victims - to some pretty connected people and I wanted to talk to them - Trump is the only person who picked up the phone and said "Let's just talk, I'll give you as much time as you want, and tell you what you need to know." He was very helpful in the information that he gave, and gave no information whatsoever that he was involved in anything untoward whatsoever - but had good information - that checked out - and that helped us, and we didn't even have to take a deposition from him."

BoscoX -> RE: Will we be seeing the Jeffrey Epstein files soon? (7/28/2025 5:12:53 AM)
There you have it - "Trump is the only person who picked up the phone and said "Let's just talk, I'll give you as much time as you want, and tell you what you need to know." Trump kicked the man out of Mar-a-Lago when the depths of his depravity were found out, which is all old news rehashed by your cult with added dark insinuations, purely for propaganda purposes And you dance to their tune exactly as you are told to dance to their tune [sm=marionette.gif]

Page: << < prev 1 [2] 3 4 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.03125