MrRodgers
Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: bounty44
quote:
ORIGINAL: MrRodgers
quote:
ORIGINAL: MasterBrentC
quote:
ORIGINAL: mnottertail
America has a technological military, run on Chinese processors, and knock out the satellites that run it, and fry the processors in the equipment, and thats the ballgame.
The emperor has no clothes here.
China got those processors from your boy Bill Clinton. Look it up.
Just more of your partisan bullshit.
After outlining her methodological approach, Mays devotes her second chapter to preliminary attempts to reform the semiconductor industry. Chinese scientists had persuaded their government of semiconductors’ strategic significance during the 1950s, but at the end of the Cultural Revolution only a handful of factories had moved beyond producing discrete circuit components like diodes or transistors. In the early 1980s, the State Council—China’s highest political body—moved to address this technological deficiency. After consulting with industry experts, in 1983 the Council settled upon a consolidation strategy. Instead of distributing resources to dozens of semiconductor facilities scattered across the country, they would instead build two regional “bases” centered around Beijing and the southern city of Wuxi: concentrated geographic areas encouraging the exchange of human and material resources among a handful of firms.
For the remainder of the decade, as the government divested from a growing number of semiconductor factories, it also granted the surviving operations a degree of autonomy and limited access to the open market. At the same time, the government remained deeply involved in the management of five key semiconductor enterprises and a new project to establish China’s first world-class integrated device manufacturer (I.D.M.) facility in Wuxi, where Mays conducted the bulk of her research.
HERE
Rather, western capitalist profiteers...have no clothes. Hell the Soviets got the IC from Kissinger and friends during Detente. [sic] Otherwise how would the west create a brand new profit center in countering the ensuing MIRV'ed and mobile missiles the USSR then built...with our help. Ahh yes, the Cold War...the gift that kept on giving and for almost all of that $7 trillion. from 1949 to 1989.
sigh...
there's absolutely nothing in your post that precludes brent from being correct. that is, everything you just said could be true, and so could what he said.
i don't know completely know to what he is referring, and really, neither do you. so to accuse him of "partisan bullshit" while youre naïve as to what he knows, is its own form of "partisan bullshit."
i suspect he might be referring to this:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/991826/posts
China did not get processors from Clinton. What they got was radiation protected chips. In fact as of the Clinton admin. China was well on its way to having or advancing to any processors they needed. Plus, I am willing to give you odds that the prime motivator was lobbying and this a big profit for the supplier.
In addition, Judicial Watch is as partisan as they get, going after every dem action or policy while never laying a hand on repubs.
_____________________________
You can be a murderous tyrant and the world will remember you fondly but fuck one horse and you will be a horse fucker for all eternity. Catherine the Great
Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the opposite.
J K Galbraith
|
RE: Trump on China - 
Profile
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread