RE: New wave feminism: Hazardous to society’s health (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Nnanji -> RE: New wave feminism: Hazardous to society’s health (9/13/2016 6:44:28 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwird

Tell us, then, who is 'hating' what or whom, exactly?

Ed, stop. You just aren't capable. Stop before you are embarrassed again.




Nnanji -> RE: New wave feminism: Hazardous to society’s health (9/13/2016 6:46:42 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kaliko


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji

I have to say it again. I grew up around Berkeley in the 60's. RM sounds now like feminists did back then. And all of you haters here sound just like the people in the 60's sounded in response to them. You haters can't see it, I think it's a humorous twist. But you are those things you propose you hate. The funny thing is that your system of thought gives you permission to hate. So, really, you sound like Jim Crow whites in the 50's south talking about a human that just isn't quite human. It's funny as hell.


I agree with this wholeheartedly.


I hear people ask how can a Hitler come to power. Then I see this sort of thing and I understand.




Edwird -> RE: New wave feminism: Hazardous to society’s health (9/13/2016 7:00:37 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji


quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwird

Tell us, then, who is 'hating' what or whom, exactly?

Ed, stop. You just aren't capable. Stop before you are embarrassed again.


Answer the question.

If you are capable.

Even realizing that there be nothing short of embarrassment in the effort, but give it a try.






Nnanji -> RE: New wave feminism: Hazardous to society’s health (9/13/2016 7:11:22 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwird

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji


quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwird

Tell us, then, who is 'hating' what or whom, exactly?

Ed, stop. You just aren't capable. Stop before you are embarrassed again.


Answer the question.

If you are capable.

Even realizing that there be nothing short of embarrassment in the effort, but give it a try.




Ed,pulling the ol' you didn't answer my stupid question so you're an idiot that doesn't drink kool aid won't make up for your short ( no pun intended) comings. Hang it up Ed.




ThatDizzyChick -> RE: New wave feminism: Hazardous to society’s health (9/13/2016 7:16:34 PM)

You're pretty much useless as a comenter aren't you?




Nnanji -> RE: New wave feminism: Hazardous to society’s health (9/13/2016 7:20:09 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

You're pretty much useless as a comenter aren't you?

To you and your two sycophants, yes.




Edwird -> RE: New wave feminism: Hazardous to society’s health (9/13/2016 7:41:03 PM)

That's the best you got?

What a loser.

This is the same guy who claims that polluters are the best to leave pollution laws to, and banks are the best at self-policing, am I right?

Because 'business' understands business better than the government does, right?

Two wars and one massive financial meltdown and megabillions of tax dollars later, how's that working out for us?

Answer the question above, fuckwit.

What does anything occurring today have anything remotely to do with Berkely in 1967?




Nnanji -> RE: New wave feminism: Hazardous to society’s health (9/13/2016 7:46:26 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwird

That's the best you got?

What a loser.

This is the same guy who claims that polluters are the best to leave pollution laws to, and banks are the best at self-policing, am I right?

Because 'business' understands business better than the government does, right?

Two wars and one massive financial meltdown and megabillions of tax dollars later, how's that working out for us?

Answer the question above, fuckwit.

What does anything occurring today have anything remotely to do with Berkely in 1967?

Ed, poor guy. Still have that angst from being shown up as a lier and blustering idiot. Truly Ed, just hang your head and leave.




Edwird -> RE: New wave feminism: Hazardous to society’s health (9/13/2016 7:53:32 PM)


Oh wait, ... you might actually have a point here, howevermuch by just tripping over it in process of slobbering.

In 1967, everybody could see what a loony the governor of California was, good thing he wasn't running for prez.

But then 1980.

Sometimes, nightmares come true.

So yeah, I suppose we might be in that same situation today.




Nnanji -> RE: New wave feminism: Hazardous to society’s health (9/13/2016 7:59:23 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwird


Oh wait, ... you might actually have a point here, howevermuch by just tripping over it in process of slobbering.

In 1967, everybody could see what a loony the governor of California was, good thing he wasn't running for prez.

But then 1980.

Sometimes, nightmares come true.

So yeah, I suppose we might be in that same situation today.


Lol




Edwird -> RE: New wave feminism: Hazardous to society’s health (9/13/2016 8:04:37 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji


quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwird

That's the best you got?

What a loser.

This is the same guy who claims that polluters are the best to leave pollution laws to, and banks are the best at self-policing, am I right?

Because 'business' understands business better than the government does, right?

Two wars and one massive financial meltdown and megabillions of tax dollars later, how's that working out for us?

Answer the question above, fuckwit.

What does anything occurring today have anything remotely to do with Berkely in 1967?

Ed, poor guy. Still have that angst from being shown up as a lier and blustering idiot. Truly Ed, just hang your head and leave.


It was you that lied, in matter of fact. You never responded when I referred back to my initial post in that thread that pointed out that corporate taxes were just another cost. At first you claimed that it was an extraordinary expense, then you later claimed that it was an 'operating expense,' being wrong in both cases. If you have an issue with that, take it to the accounting department at your nearest university.




Nnanji -> RE: New wave feminism: Hazardous to society’s health (9/13/2016 8:14:17 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwird


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji


quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwird

That's the best you got?

What a loser.

This is the same guy who claims that polluters are the best to leave pollution laws to, and banks are the best at self-policing, am I right?

Because 'business' understands business better than the government does, right?

Two wars and one massive financial meltdown and megabillions of tax dollars later, how's that working out for us?

Answer the question above, fuckwit.

What does anything occurring today have anything remotely to do with Berkely in 1967?

Ed, poor guy. Still have that angst from being shown up as a lier and blustering idiot. Truly Ed, just hang your head and leave.


It was you that lied, in matter of fact. You never responded when I referred back to my initial post in that thread that pointed out that corporate taxes were just another cost. At first you claimed that it was an extraordinary expense, then you later claimed that it was an 'operating expense,' being wrong in both cases. If you have an issue with that, take it to the accounting department at your nearest university.


Lol, weird. Opps,wired. Jees what a poor mind to live in.




Aylee -> RE: New wave feminism: Hazardous to society’s health (9/13/2016 8:17:37 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwird


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji

I have to say it again. I grew up around Berkeley in the 60's. RM sounds now like feminists did back then. And all of you haters here sound just like the people in the 60's sounded in response to them. You haters can't see it, I think it's a humorous twist. But you are those things you propose you hate. The funny thing is that your system of thought gives you permission to hate. So, really, you sound like Jim Crow whites in the 50's south talking about a human that just isn't quite human. It's funny as hell.



I can see what you mean. Especially with things like this:


quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwird


Not that there be any indication that someone is seriously desirous of a depleted uraniun coated strapon dildo shoved in his arse or anything.




I recall reading about the comments that the feminists of the 60's just needed a dick in them.

Of course I usually just chalk it up to the leftists desires for anyone they do not like to be anally raped. I see it a lot and I have spoken out against it more than once.


That was a one-off, and if you couldn't see that for what it was then it's no wonder that people of your mindset are consistently ascribed with lower intellect.

Oh, and before you take off with that 'lefties are so snobbish' crap, it's likely I've pissed off as many lefties on this site as anyone else.

One has to have the mind for it in the first place, which neocons find difficult to the task, but thanks for the laughs in any case.


One has to have the mind for it to find wishing anal rape, cancer, and death on someone you do not like or disagree with is funny? And only those with superior intellect get your humor.

Oh my.




Edwird -> RE: New wave feminism: Hazardous to society’s health (9/13/2016 8:47:44 PM)

If you think I actually wished that upon any person, you can have it if it makes you feel better about yourself.




Edwird -> RE: New wave feminism: Hazardous to society’s health (9/13/2016 8:52:49 PM)



Not to worry, we still have the ten yr. old kids in Pakistan sewing together soccer balls for ten yr, olds to kick around in our homeland.








Edwird -> RE: New wave feminism: Hazardous to society’s health (9/13/2016 8:59:05 PM)


~






ThatDizzyChick -> RE: New wave feminism: Hazardous to society’s health (9/13/2016 9:02:27 PM)

Hey, come on folks you're supposed to be hating on the evil feminazis in this thread, not each other.




Edwird -> RE: New wave feminism: Hazardous to society’s health (9/13/2016 9:18:37 PM)

Hey girl.

Much congrats on your soon-to-be new arrival to the world.

Just don't be foolish as my mom was with me.

"So there I was, just plunked out in the car."

She waited till the last minute.

Don't let that happen to you.

Again, good wishes to you and yours.




ThatDizzyChick -> RE: New wave feminism: Hazardous to society’s health (9/13/2016 9:43:50 PM)

Thanks, but you're a little late, she arrived in January.




Edwird -> RE: New wave feminism: Hazardous to society’s health (9/13/2016 10:08:46 PM)

I suspected that I was commenting after the fact.

But if this means anything, hear this from a male if I commend you for not paying any attention to the mags at the grocery store saying things like "here's how I lost 40 pounds after shoving the brat out 4 months ago!"

I do excellent uncle, BTW.

Send that brat to me, and I will have him/her walking and talking 2 months before you ever thought possible.

J/K.

But I have in fact done the uncle thing with good reports back from kids to parents, no lie.




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125