crazyml
Posts: 5568
Joined: 7/3/2007 Status: offline
|
[ED to fix quoting] quote:
ORIGINAL: bounty44 quote:
ORIGINAL: crazyml Hmm... well, to be honest... if they're just "thinking" about raping and mutilating twitter posters that they disagree with, I'm pretty sure they won't be caught out by this. If they send someone a message saying "I'm going to rape and mutilate you" that's not a "thought crime"... that's a "hate crime" Can you see the distinction? "hate crimes" are the offspring of "thought crimes." you cannot get to the former without inventing, and thereby involving the latter. I'm concerned that there's a flaw in your argument. You wouldn't argue that murder is a thought crime would you? Only, you cannot get to the actual murder without someone thinking about it first. quote:
harassment is wrong and the government has a justifiable role in protecting its citizens. whether that protection extends to "harassment" is debatable. what the government does not have the right, or even ability to do, is to label harassment as misogyny. Harassment causes distress and alarm. The government has, as you say, a justifiable role in protecting its citizens. So... that protection must extend to harassment. If the harassment is misogynistic in nature, I'm just not sure what else you'd call it. If you meant to say that the government doesn't have the right to label misogyny as harassment, then I'd agree with you, and there's nothing here that makes that claim. quote:
the next progressive left totalitarian step goes from making the action illegal, to making the supposed thought behind it illegal. Um Kay. If that's how you feel.
_____________________________
Remember.... There's always somewhere on the planet where it's jackass o'clock.
|