RE: Senator 60 Minutes- 9/11 Attackers Had “Support from Within the US”

RE: Senator 60 Minutes- 9/11 Attackers Had “Support from Within the US” (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

Real0ne -> RE: Senator 60 Minutes- 9/11 Attackers Had “Support from Within the US” (4/13/2016 12:48:56 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail That has been repeatedly debunked, by senior intel officials with names. White House had access to intelligence assessments such as the Presidential Daily Briefing (PDB) that Congress never was able to review, and the administration failed to provide lawmakers with certain dissenting views within the intelligence community. The administration also received information directly from two alternative intelligence sources that were doubted by the Intelligence Community at the time and have since been discredited: The Office of Special Plans and Iraqi National Congress. Even among the intelligence that Congress did ultimately receive, most lawmakers did not see a full assessment of the Iraqi threat prior to the delivery of the National Intelligence Estimate. Also, Senator Max Cleland, who resigned from the 9/11 Commission after calling it a “national scandal,” stated in a 2003 PBS interview, “I’m saying that’s deliberate. I am saying that the delay in relating this information to the American public out of a hearing… series of hearings, that several members of Congress knew eight or ten months ago, including Bob Graham and others, that was deliberately slow walked… the 9/11 Commission was deliberately slow walked, because the Administration’s policy was, and its priority was, we’re gonna take Saddam Hussein out.” Read more at http://thefreethoughtproject.com/senator-60-minutes-911-attackers-had-support-us/#Dww360hFrcUQ60mE.99 what possible reason would anyone say it was a national scandal if the US was not involved?

WickedsDesire -> RE: Senator 60 Minutes- 9/11 Attackers Had “Support from Within the US” (4/13/2016 1:11:23 PM)
BondageersT I find men masquerading as women, and talking in caps to be of deranged and wretched taste and their opinions often invalid and inflammatory and your pathetic tuppence worth, sickening - which is why i have singled thee out for all to see - in one of your many incarnations on here I vaguely remember the 28 pages, but not why they were withheld(redacted). As for conspiracy theorists shrugs but as you are talking about 911 i have watched a few, just never an inconvenient truth. I remain open minded...Why well building nine, or whatever it was called, looked like a controlled explosion to me ( and i probably have some strange qualification in this or letters after my name (I once blew my eye brows clean off) before i went stone bonkers. Ah America V conspiracy Obama, Libya and all the presidents' regrets i could do hundreds of links regarding this and Roswell(of course it was aliens hmm) 911 I remain open of mind.

Real0ne -> RE: Senator 60 Minutes- 9/11 Attackers Had “Support from Within the US” (4/14/2016 8:07:17 AM)
but GOFUS et al (an inconvenient truth) is very real and proven, hence far beyond theory, except to those living in denial or having no knowledge what so ever, so maybe someone who watches only MSM has an excuse but anyone on the internet not so much.

Real0ne -> RE: Senator 60 Minutes- 9/11 Attackers Had “Support from Within the US” (4/14/2016 8:14:30 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Phydeaux quote: ORIGINAL: Real0ne quote: ORIGINAL: Phydeaux Your articles says nothing of the sort. Tin foil people said the US knew of the attacks and helped in their execution. What Bob Graham is saying is that Saudi government officials, charities, and individuals, both in the US and abroad helped 9/11. One is not at all like the other. BUT 911 was a monumental crime. By definition 'helped' in the commission of a crime IS a 'conspiracy'. So we need an strong reasoned explanation from you respecting my above point and why I should consider your opinion over that of a former intelligence operator who worked for the NSA. In addition the massive negligence and outright fraud surrounding the investigation and material evidence is overwhelming, but that aside, how did you conclude its all nice perfectly innocent? It appears it does say precisely what it claims! Reread my previous response. Listen to Senator Graham yourself. In no case does he say members of the US government colluded in the attack. Graham said more than is in that little clip. He has been quite outspoken and on numerous talk shows as well. This comment from graham: quote: CBS reports, Graham and his Joint Inquiry co-chair in the House, former Representative Porter Goss (R-FL) — who went on to be director of the CIA — say the 28 pages were excised from their report by the Bush Administration in the interest of national security. Graham wouldn’t discuss the classified contents, but says the 28 pages outline a network of people he believes supported hijackers in the U.S. He tells Steve Kroft he believes the hijackers were “substantially” supported by Saudi Arabia. Asked if the support was from government, rich people or charities, the former senator replies, “all of the above.” Is that not saying the US gubblemint colluded in the attack? Seems to me it is.

Real0ne -> RE: Senator 60 Minutes- 9/11 Attackers Had “Support from Within the US” (4/14/2016 9:29:07 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: WickedsDesire i have watched a few, just never an inconvenient truth. [image]http://i1273.photobucket.com/albums/y410/mypbemotes/wtc%207/nist%20coverup_zpsmlfyy1dq.png[/image] How about NIST, that is the National Institue of Standards and Technology who instead of loudly trumpting here is what we found and this is what you engineers cant do because its dangerous instead and contrary to the reasons of their existence in the first place they classified the failure mechanisms of a building that no longer exists because it would JEOPARDIZE PUBLIC SAFETY! NIST exists for the sole purpose of testing and informing the engineering communities of the Do's and Don'ts in building design and construction (and other areas) to insure failures cannot occur, however in the case of 911 they hide the causes because if engineers know how a building failed that would JEOPARDIZE PUBLIC SAFETY! So you can poke fun of conspiracies, which is a CIA created disinformation tactic used to get people to emotionally dismiss sensitive issues that have gubblemint involvement and look the other way before reading all the facts because the last thing they would want to be is a demonized conspiracy theorist after all. Got any good jingoistic euphemisms or non-conspiracy 'theories' for that one? Is that inconvenient enough? [8\|] Long story short the bulk of the NIST evaluation of the 911 event is rooted entirely in fraud. I too remain open minded [8D]

Termyn8or -> RE: Senator 60 Minutes- 9/11 Attackers Had “Support from Within the US” (4/15/2016 2:22:54 AM)
"NIST exists for the sole purpose of testing and informing the engineering communities of the Do's and Don'ts in building design and construction" Incorrect. Though they do do that they also have in reserve real standards of volts and amps etc., weights and measures, and time. How they are involved in building codes is because there has to be accurate traceability in respect to strength of materials, their boiling point or whatever. Reading that document, technically that means they can build no more new buildings unless the architect already has that particular information. Technically it could mean no new architects because they are denied the information needed to do their job. Welcome to the Soviet States Of America. The government must see and control every piece of information. they say what knowledge you are allowed to know, not only about their evil deeds, but about everything. And I mean everything. If I posted the procedure to jailbreak a phone they might come for me. I can't do it, but if I could and put the info out there I would become a target. They don't need a search warrant to give you ten enemas to make sure you are not carrying drugs in there. they can stand Women up in the middle of the road and put fingers up their ass, and THEN pussy. they can now strap you down for an alcohol test in some places. They can search every inch of your house with nothing, and they can literally dismantle your car and leave you with a bunch of parts laying on the road and then charge you with littering. And they can hit you so hard they break their fist and charge you with battery because your bones were too strong. This is no fucking joke people. I know in the old days we joked about it like "And then you know what officer O'Malley did ? ...". Yeah, it used to be different. Know what ? Cops walked a beat, and people had guns. How many cops got shot ? You never heard about it. Even shot at. And now, the way the courts are stacked they don't have to give anyone the third degree. Just stack up charges until it adds up yo 400 years in the joint and the guy is likely to cop a plea. Greatest country in the world. What the fuck must other people be living with ? T^T

Real0ne -> RE: Senator 60 Minutes- 9/11 Attackers Had “Support from Within the US” (4/16/2016 11:43:54 AM)
well believe it or not a freakin high school teacher forced them to correct their bullshit. Not purdue, not MIT, not berkley, not ONE university stood up, no other agency like the asce etc stood up to correct the FRAUD perpetrated upon the american people, a fucking high school teacher risked getting fired to stand out and call them on the fraud. Even with that they only did a partial correction. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DDWknogw5Gw

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.15625