DWS - claimed to be gleeful at the chance of running against trump

DWS - claimed to be gleeful at the chance of running against trump (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

Phydeaux -> DWS - claimed to be gleeful at the chance of running against trump (3/12/2016 8:42:40 AM)
Recent interview she was saying the DNC welcomed the chance to run against trump, as his 4 bankruptcies, trump university would make the american voter vote for Hillary. Earth to Ms. Wasserman-Shultz. Your candidate has a bit of baggage on her own you know. As a review - here are the top 22 Clinton scandals... http://www.wnd.com/2015/05/here-they-are-hillarys-22-biggest-scandals-ever/

Lucylastic -> RE: DWS - claimed to be gleeful at the chance of running against trump (3/12/2016 8:46:10 AM)
If wnd were fact, they would have pulled more out of trumps history, LOL WND really???? altho yeah apart from infowars or alex jones you couldnt have found those conspiracies anywhere. LMAO DWS is as fucked as reice priebus.

mnottertail -> RE: DWS - claimed to be gleeful at the chance of running against trump (3/12/2016 8:59:55 AM)
It would only be news of any import if DWS said, we hope we don't have to run against Trump, he is a perfect candidate.

MasterBrentC -> RE: DWS - claimed to be gleeful at the chance of running against trump (3/12/2016 9:00:01 AM)
Who needs a website to know the troubles Hillary is in? Don't you know that the F.B.I. has over 100 felonies on Hillary ready for the Justice Dept.? And that's just with her emails. There is so much to hate about Hillary.

mnottertail -> RE: DWS - claimed to be gleeful at the chance of running against trump (3/12/2016 9:02:22 AM)
Nope, nobody knows any such a stupid fucking thing, and you certainly don't know it either. There may be a great deal to hate about any candidate. But mostly it looks like no more than a horse apiece.

Lucylastic -> RE: DWS - claimed to be gleeful at the chance of running against trump (3/12/2016 9:07:19 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MasterBrentC Who needs a website to know the troubles Hillary is in? Don't you know that the F.B.I. has over 100 felonies on Hillary ready for the Justice Dept.? And that's just with her emails. There is so much to hate about Hillary. , Im sorry, you dont have any hard proof to back up your bullcrap, but keep baiting. Its so much conspiracy:) LMAO.

MasterBrentC -> RE: DWS - claimed to be gleeful at the chance of running against trump (3/12/2016 9:13:15 AM)
Its ok for all you dumbocrats to keep burying your head in the sand. But if you want you be enlightened..... http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/feb/8/hillary-clinton-emails-fbi-probe-confirmed-state-d/?page=all

mnottertail -> RE: DWS - claimed to be gleeful at the chance of running against trump (3/12/2016 9:34:26 AM)
We are not so ignorant as the followers of the slobbering nutsuckerisms of Sun Myung Moon.

accublond -> RE: DWS - claimed to be gleeful at the chance of running against trump (3/12/2016 9:37:02 AM)
As long as you're going to call us names... let's look at your candidates: one is a facist bigot who has gone bankrupt 3 times and defrauded thousand of people, including by not paying hundreds of undocumented construction workers; another is the friendless, born-again son of a religious nut -- ineligible to be President because he was born in Calgary, Canada to a Cuban mother -- who would remove the few remaining constitutional separations between church and state; and the third is a robotic, lightweight, no-show Senator who flip-flops on the issues and is distrusted and disliked in his own home state. The Rush Limbaugh right (including the "Washington Times") has been throwing crap at Hillary for twenty-five years, and virtually none of it has stuck. The simple fact is that she and Bernie are intelligent, enlightened and worldy people who are light years ahead of any of the GOP goofballs. Thankfully for America, either one of them will win the November general election going away...

Lucylastic -> RE: DWS - claimed to be gleeful at the chance of running against trump (3/12/2016 9:58:25 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MasterBrentC Its ok for all you dumbocrats to keep burying your head in the sand. But if you want you be enlightened..... http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/feb/8/hillary-clinton-emails-fbi-probe-confirmed-state-d/?page=all I havent got my head buried in the sand, I know the facts SO far, what I dont buy is right wing media conspiracies, "maybes, perhaps's, mights, coulds shoulds , what ifs or likelys being used as fact. That post is over a month old....what factually new "information has been shown" that has come out apart from pagliano? Since the NY times started the bullshit about it, before that it was benghazi Nothing factual but ohhhhh oodles of idiots posting more "maybe" bullshit to cover their self righteous ignorance.. BTW Brent, your particular brand of low information screeching is the most hilarious.

MasterBrentC -> RE: DWS - claimed to be gleeful at the chance of running against trump (3/12/2016 10:08:27 AM)
Yea, but I'd still fuck ya. LOL

Lucylastic -> RE: DWS - claimed to be gleeful at the chance of running against trump (3/12/2016 10:10:47 AM)
LMAO....you wouldnt stand a chance. moron.

MasterBrentC -> RE: DWS - claimed to be gleeful at the chance of running against trump (3/12/2016 10:36:06 AM)
I'm sure you'll be in denial about this just like your in denial about everything http://lawnewz.com/high-profile/fbi-is-now-getting-crucial-roadmap-from-clinton-aide-about-emails/

Lucylastic -> RE: DWS - claimed to be gleeful at the chance of running against trump (3/12/2016 10:54:30 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MasterBrentC I'm sure you'll be in denial about this just like your in denial about everything Was that meant to come on the tail of your previous comment? Or were you in denial of my response? [sm=smoke_woman_101.gif]

mnottertail -> RE: DWS - claimed to be gleeful at the chance of running against trump (3/12/2016 11:04:56 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MasterBrentC I'm sure you'll be in denial about this just like your in denial about everything http://lawnewz.com/high-profile/fbi-is-now-getting-crucial-roadmap-from-clinton-aide-about-emails/ A rehash of Faux Nuze cockgargling word for word from another previous post. It is nutsucker toiletlicking on its face. The intelligence source close to faux cockgargling is the Faux cockgargler whatever that mattress backed sluts name is. The FBI is not clueing her into anything, she doesnt even know the names of the people working the case. FBI agents active in investigation areen't telling any nutsucker let alone the president,or anyone else of this planet anything, they dont operate that way. See, the largest reason is nutsuckers are cretins, and they have the annoying habit of slobbering into microphones. We saw this same frenetic pud pounding by first Issa and then the closeted homosexual Gowdy. Turned out it was straight out of the Minneapolis Airport Bathroom Caucus. The only deepthroating is felch gobbling from and between nutsuckers.

WickedsDesire -> RE: DWS - claimed to be gleeful at the chance of running against trump (3/12/2016 11:36:07 AM)
…..Twenty-two emails sent through Hillary Clinton's unsecured home server while she was secretary of state contained government secrets, US officials say. "This appears to be over-classification run amok," it said in statement Intelligence officials told the Associated Press that the 37 pages being withheld concerned so-called "special access programmes" - clandestine projects such as drone strikes or government eavesdropping…. Source Right that’s where I am up to what’s all the fuss about and ooo she had a private email server – and? Thought the governments servers were hacked all the time, not to mention accessed by the NSA. And it’s not like you don’t have private armies and militias and suppressing secret alien technology and free energy. And fuk me we know you spy on everyone and drone strike any shifty looking jonny foreigner (the emails that were classified as secret) At the end of the day who cares and how shifty is this buffoonery character who wishes to bring back water boarding and a “lot worse”. Buffoonery opens his mouth I can hear jaws a smacking the floor because of his incredulous statements of raving lunacy(not the good kind) I came across this the other day I am not a crook to coin a phrase or more realistically the article is titled can Donald Buffoonery every claim to be 100% clean...not sure many can be...hmmm I am okay with that as people are human. Can someone tell me poll wise what percentage will vote democrat and which the Nazi republican tea party =- to be fair that lot will try and stop him a t the cost of sabotaging their own presidency Futurama: Richard Nixon watches a Squirrel Nixons back

ThatDizzyChick -> RE: DWS - claimed to be gleeful at the chance of running against trump (3/12/2016 12:03:46 PM)
You are an embarrassment to humanity

MasterBrentC -> RE: DWS - claimed to be gleeful at the chance of running against trump (3/12/2016 12:06:14 PM)
I knew you would be in denial. You're so fucking easy.

ThatDizzyChick -> RE: DWS - claimed to be gleeful at the chance of running against trump (3/12/2016 12:09:21 PM)
Huh?

mnottertail -> RE: DWS - claimed to be gleeful at the chance of running against trump (3/12/2016 12:44:58 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Phydeaux Recent interview she was saying the DNC welcomed the chance to run against trump, as his 4 bankruptcies, trump university would make the american voter vote for Hillary. Earth to Ms. Wasserman-Shultz. Your candidate has a bit of baggage on her own you know. As a review - here are the top 22 Clinton scandals... http://www.wnd.com/2015/05/here-they-are-hillarys-22-biggest-scandals-ever/ W only had one, and look at that fucking disaster, 4 bankruptcies? might play well to the innumerate nutsuckers, but the american people wont buy into that. Remember when the nutsuckers were slobbering that, well fuck China we wont pay em asswipe? Howd that play in Poughkeepsie?

Page: [1] 2 3 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.6289063