joether
Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005 Status: offline
|
Ok, maybe no film on this one.... Sort of related to the story to follow... Many years ago I recall hearing about a guy flying an R/C B-17D that was 1:8th scale. A BIG craft. He selected an area with low trees and open area. Everything was fine until he heard a thundering sound and the left wing was blow off. The craft fell to the earth. Apparently some hunter was out there, completely camouflaged and got annoyed by the R/C device. When the two met up, the hunter actually apologized and offered to pay for damaged. He realized his fit of 'mindless rage' did more damage than simply standing up and calmly walking over to the individual to ask if he could go else where. They actually became good friends after that. What follows as I state, is not this same happy ending. No, this story involves a guy flying a drone copter over his property while testing it out. His neighbor, shot the thing down with a shotgun; believing it to be a CIA surveillance device spying on him. Can you say 'not with it in reality'? The owner of the drone decided to email his neighbor about the issue. He included the damages and asked for the sum of $700. The neighbor (whom had fired his gun off two times before and hitting the first person's house) said 'No'. What makes this case amusing is the 'dude with the shotgun' spews forth 'responsibility and accountability' with power as it concerns government. Oh yeah, he's a REAL wingnut. An actual Tea Partier! In other words, others have to be fully responsible and accountable over what they do and don't do, but he doesn't. Particularly were it concerns his fragile mental state or his shotgun. An this idiot is on the local school board. Is it intelligent or wise to have a loose cannon of an individual with a gun as it concerns a school? It should be noted that the first neighbor has the GPS course of the drone. The entire flight from start to crash took place on his property and 203 feet away from his neighbor's property. It should also be noted that the copter did not have any kind of surveillance equipment, nor a basic camera on the drone at the time. So the first neighbor took his shotgun-wielding neighbor to court. The court awarded the first neighbor with $850 in damages. The second neighbor as of this article, has refused to pay. Should the shotgun wielding neighbor be forced to pay the damages? Could the first neighbor contact the police and have the neighbor arrested for reckless endangerment with a firearm? SOURCE
|