|
thompsonx -> RE: Frontline: How the US lost IRAQ (10/29/2014 12:06:24 PM)
|
ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
I found this in that link.
We would tie American aid to incremental changes not just in the attitudes, but in the fundamental structures, of countries. These changes would move those countries, slowly but inexorably, toward reflecting our Constitution in their own charters.
I have looked closely at our constitution and found no authorization for this sort of skuldugery.
We would unabashedly fund pro-democracy movements around the world, partly with government funding and partly with donations from American citizens.
Taxpayers tagged twice to fund this morons vision of world domination.
Through these donations we would seek to double the budgets of the CIA and our Special Forces, seek to fund an international mercenary force for good and provide our veterans unparalleled health care.
Our curent budget is pretty big and vets healh care is in the news regularly in a less than positive light what would this punk do to change that?
We would urge our leaders, after their service in the U.S. Senate and Congress, to seek dual citizenship in other nations, like France and Italy and Sweden and Argentina and Brazil and Germany, and work to influence those nations to adopt laws very much like our own. We might even fund our leaders' campaigns for office in these other nations.
Soundsl like he is in favor of "anchor babies"
We would accept the fact that an American jihad could mean boots on the ground in many places in the world where human rights are being denigrated and horrors are unfolding.
Like furgestan missouri?
Because wherever leaders and movements appear that seek to trample upon the human spirit, we have a God-given right to intervene —
This assumes facts not in evidence.
because we have been to the mountaintop of freedom, and we have seen the Promised Land spanning the globe.
Either he has a turd in his pocket or the koch brothers.
An American jihad would never condone terrorist acts of violence against our adversaries or the targeting of people simply because their beliefs are different from ours.
Which would be a departure from sop.
But for those who malignantly demonstrate their intentions to subjugate others, there would be no quarter.
Kinda like the "contras"
|
|
|
|
