|
freedomdwarf1 -> RE: Institutional Discrimination (6/2/2014 12:25:05 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri quote:
ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1 FR~ I don't see what all the fuss is about. Do the same thing they expect of international airline and shipping pilots - make sure they can speak (and understand) reasonably fluent International. I speak 3 languages (sort-of) - English, International (that's English to everyone out there) and a smattering of American [:D] Oh... and I know some universal words that seem to work everywhere no matter what they speak... "Taxi", "Pepsi", "toilet" and "coffee". [:)] Here's the question, though: Who is "they" that holds those expectations? Is it government mandating it, or business demanding it of applicants to be hired? I'd say it would be good business practice to insist on International and American as an absolute minimum with a preference to those that speak the local lingo; be that Spanish, Mexican, French or whatever. I'd also advocate that the practice be adopted for the majority of hospital staff and those in the service industry (cafe's, restaurants, superstores, larger supermarkets etc). I know they are doing that for our hospital staff over here (and about bloody time too!!). I know the UK is mandating that all new immigrants must pass a simple test to ensure they speak the lingo to a reasonable degree and have a modicum of British history/customs knowledge before they are able to gain residency of any sort. I think the US should do something similar for anyone wishing to live there. Being part of a country (any country) should be more than just learning The Oath parrot-fashion.
|
|
|
|