|
MercTech -> RE: Up-skirt photos legal in Massachusetts... (3/8/2014 9:26:59 AM)
|
Yep, the lawyers wrote an overly complicated law that the courts ruled did not apply in the creeper's case.
Hmm, how to word a law that would make the creeper's antics with upskirt, downshirt, toilet cam, and infrared tit-shot videos unlawful while not criminalizing the photographer's lawful ability to take public venue pictures?
The use of film or digital photography or electronic surveillance to offensively compromise the modesty of garbed citizens shall be considered an infraction punishable by .... <insert appropriate punishment for creepers>
A BTW sidebar: Why include "infrared tit-shots"
After Sony mistakenly shipped a model of video camera that had an infrared low light setting that allowed you to film the body through clothing it came to light that many of the CCD elements in any digital video cameras can actually see through clothing but you get only visible light as there is a software filter to give you good looking pictures and cut out non visible spectra.
At one time there were HNGs trolling the grocery stores with Sony video cams and posting tit shots of the female patrons.
It would be difficult but possible to do a machine language level hack on some digital cameras in order to turn it into "x-ray goggles".
|
|
|
|
