|
joether -> RE: I am at a loss to understand. (1/9/2014 2:02:51 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: FellowSlave quote:
The problem, is that when this young man was shot in the chest, he was on the ground with two other officers holding him down. There were two reasons the young man was held down to be shot. At first, an average policeman is bad shooter, the target must be close; secondly, they are instructed to kill not to disable (because of legal problems; dead men do not talk). The police is very dangerous, many are mentally ill or unstable, it is much more likely to be killed by the police than by the terrorist. Recently a policeman shot and killed a young man, an innocent bystander, because he did not like his body language. If your looking for the 'mentally unstable', try the mirror in your bathroom first. Your stating that ALL police officers are not only dangerous, but many of them mentally ill and/or unstable. Given the amount of regulations, rules, and laws, police would be one of the last groups to suffer from mental illness. Yes, mental illness can strike anyone, at anytime, for any reason. Yet, police are trained to be observant, its part of their job. They would be more likely to notice if one of their own is behaving oddly and if a friend, get them out of the situation before things got ugly. You are not bound by even 1/10,000 of the rules police are under. How do we know your not mentally ill or unstable? Since only an insane person would state all police are dangerous and of that group, most of them are mentally ill or unstable. Its called 'paranoia' and/or 'delusion'. Both are pretty serious illnesses. Your accusation is even further silly. Your practically accusing all three police officers of being mentally unstable. What would the plain odds of three police officers, from different jurisdictions, arriving at one place. An conspiring to kill some kid? That is your argument on display.
|
|
|
|