RE: Is it common for submisives to be seriously Dominant in their Public and Professional life?ly (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


SerWhiteTiger -> RE: Is it common for submisives to be seriously Dominant in their Public and Professional life?ly (10/2/2013 11:29:11 PM)

Different people are different.




SerWhiteTiger -> RE: Is it common for submisives to be seriously Dominant in their Public and Professional life?ly (10/2/2013 11:30:55 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: OsideGirl


quote:

ORIGINAL: Rochsub2009
I have a VERY dominant personality. I'm in charge all the time, and people naturally follow me. People who meet me at BDSM functions are always shocked to learn that I'm a sub. In fact, I started my BDSM journey as a Dom. Because of my personality, it's what everyone thought I should be. But I get far more enjoyment and fulfillment from submission. I don't know why, but I do. Perhaps it has something to do with putting down the mantle of leadership that I have to carry most of the day.

Because of my dominant personality, I can't submit to just anyone. It takes a very dominant personality to dominate me. In fact, I've often been told that I'm not a "real sub". But that's not true. When faced with one who earns my submission, it is total and complete.


Your description fits me as well. Right down to the many men who told me that I'm not a "real submissive".



Many men are not real Doms, so they require someone excessively meek and submissive in order for anyone to submit to them at all.




Charles6682 -> RE: Is it common for submisives to be seriously Dominant in their Public and Professional life?ly (10/3/2013 12:38:43 PM)

One of the biggest "reasons" people feel male subs were justified in their submission, is because they must have been a major CEO and needed a break from being in control. While I don't doubt this is true, it just seemed like it was a way to make powerful male subs feel "okay". So, what about all the many subs who didn't have endless money to afford private sessions? What was their excuse?




TigressLily -> RE: Is it common for submisives to be seriously Dominant in their Public and Professional life?ly (10/3/2013 1:05:14 PM)


Charles, what I don't understand is why would a male need any 'excuse' or feel he has to justify why he's (sexually) submissive? To whom? To other males? To his vanilla wife?

Or anybody, for that matter. I don't have a daughter, but if I did, I won't pretend I wouldn't be disappointed if she chose to be submissive. But that's more of a reflection on me than on her. My love for my children is unconditional. I want more than anything for them to be healthy and happy, to find fulfillment in their life's pursuits, to be the best that they can be. Why would I want them to be miserable just to please me? I can't live their lives for them. When my role as a guiding force has run its course, then I've done my job as a parent, and I hand the torch over to them.


_____________________________

* * * Not A Fetish/Kink Delivery System * * *




Rochsub2009 -> RE: Is it common for submisives to be seriously Dominant in their Public and Professional life?ly (10/3/2013 1:49:16 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: TigressLily


Charles, what I don't understand is why would a male need any 'excuse' or feel he has to justify why he's (sexually) submissive? To whom? To other males? To his vanilla wife?




That was my thought exactly. Why would I ever need to justify my submission? The thought of doing so has never even entered my head. I simply accept myself as I am, and I really don't care what anyone else thinks about me.

I certainly don't need an "excuse" for my submission. Perhaps others feel that they do. But I can't relate to that way of thinking.




Rochsub2009 -> RE: Is it common for submisives to be seriously Dominant in their Public and Professional life?ly (10/3/2013 1:56:45 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Charles6682
So, what about all the many subs who didn't have endless money to afford private sessions? What was their excuse?


Charles,
Your answer shows that you come at this from a different perspective than I do. Based on your use of the word "sessions", and your reference to "endless money", I am going to assume that you are used to paying pro Dommes for domination sessions. Personally, I don't pay pros, so I don't think in terms of sessions. I view things more from the perspective of a FLR.

I hadn't spent much time thinking about it before, but subs who routinely utilize the services of pro Dommes must have very different concerns/experiences than those who are more used to D/s relationships. Although, I guess that those who see pros on a regular basis probably view what they have as a relationship as well.




KnightofMists -> RE: Is it common for submisives to be seriously Dominant in their Public and Professional life?ly (10/3/2013 3:02:05 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: sunshinemiss

I love that Roch Sub - describes me and most of my submissive women friends to a T! We are all cussed individualists, strong willed women, passionate and powerful in our jobs and our lives. Every last one of us. Get us with the right man (or person) for us, and we are all mewling like little kittens.
best,
sunshine


Not to forget one needs to put drop clothes down for all the milk spillage




responsiveone -> RE: Is it common for submisives to be seriously Dominant in their Public and Professional life?ly (10/4/2013 8:29:15 AM)

I consider myself as a confident submissive. I can think of only a few actual paying jobs that would be better served by someone who is 100% submissive; needing to be told precisely what to do while feeling the need to be punished if they screwed something up. Who knows? That person may screw up on purpose. I certainly wouldn't want to work with someone like this.

In that regard, this may be why it is so hard to find someone truly submissive on a personal basis. Even though they may think they are submissive there will always be, at least a small amount, of self-assertiveness present. The ability to control these tendencies is one of traits that defines an excellent Dom. This, of course, is just my opinion.




OsideGirl -> RE: Is it common for submisives to be seriously Dominant in their Public and Professional life?ly (10/4/2013 10:05:34 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: responsiveone
needing to be told precisely what to do while feeling the need to be punished if they screwed something up. Who knows? That person may screw up on purpose. I certainly wouldn't want to work with someone like this.


Not everyone has a punishment dynamic or feels that punishment is an effective tool.




responsiveone -> RE: Is it common for submisives to be seriously Dominant in their Public and Professional life?ly (10/4/2013 10:58:46 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: OsideGirl

Not everyone has a punishment dynamic or feels that punishment is an effective tool.



Good point. Maybe "punished" wasn't the correct word. "Acknowledged" better fits what I was trying to say.




noellesdestiny -> RE: Is it common for submisives to be seriously Dominant in their Public and Professional life?ly (10/4/2013 12:47:11 PM)

I am definitely a leader in the work force, but know my submissive side is still there. I am confident.




Charles6682 -> RE: Is it common for submisives to be seriously Dominant in their Public and Professional life?ly (10/4/2013 12:50:58 PM)

I don't need an excuse for my submission. I don't care to impress people I don't even know. I can be assertive at time's when I need and have to be. There is a time and place for everything.




SlipSlidingAway -> RE: Is it common for submisives to be seriously Dominant in their Public and Professional life?ly (10/4/2013 12:56:47 PM)

I am a leader when I need to be the leader. It's about responsibility. I do what I have to, when I have to, and to the best of my ability. That's true whether I'm the one in charge or when I am submitting. So, for me? It's pretty much situational. I find that, more often then not, the same skill set suits me well in both situations. Attention to detail, getting the job done, pushing myself (sometimes beyond my comfort zone), and focusing on the goal(s) (whether I set them or someone else does).




LookieNoNookie -> RE: Is it common for submisives to be seriously Dominant in their Public and Professional life?ly (10/4/2013 3:31:30 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: casidi75

Some times it feels like a spit personality however most times I must remain dominant however my most enjoyable state is to be safe to reveal my at ease submisive nature. It is awesome. To let go and release the polar opposite. Best regard casidi75


Gawdamned right!




theshytype -> RE: Is it common for submisives to be seriously Dominant in their Public and Professional life?ly (10/4/2013 8:15:36 PM)

FR-


I'm not a leader.  Not because I can't, I just don't care to be.  

While I consider myself very submissive, I have to say according to others definitions of such, all the attributes an extremely submissive person must be, I suppose I'd have to go with I'm in the middle instead. 

I'm not ignorant to be fooled into any relationship because they smack a dominant label on their own self. 
I'm not weak.  I can very much fight for myself (if the person and/or fight are worth fighting - which is rarely the case.  Most things are just not worth my time and energy). 
I am very much an individualist.  I can either follow or go off by myself, alone and not leading.
I may or may not submit to those I don't respect.  Bark orders for the sake of barking and I'll very much want to muzzle you.  But I probably won't.  I'll most likely just keep my mouth shut and walk away. 
I am a confident person in my self and abilities. 
I get things done because they need to be.  I don't need to be micromanaged (in fact I hate it).  I'm quite capable of taking on the lead of projects, because that's what a dominant figure wants me to do.  Not for the enjoyment.  
I do have a brain and am capable of making decisions.

Personally, I don't think any of these things make me a less all-around submissive person.  What I believe I have is a mixture of a whole lot of submissive tendencies mixed with the fact that I do hugely identify with my individualism.  I don't NEED someone.  I don't NEED to be told what to do.  But if I find someone worthy, I do end up needing it (or wanting it very badly).  I prefer to follow orders because I want things done in such a way that'll please that person I respect.  I will also follow orders because sometimes it's just easier than trying to persuade a dominant personality another way and I know the fight will require more effort than the original order.  Then there are the times where someone will just take the lead and, whether I like them or not, I agree with their ideas and will let them take the lead. 




littlewonder -> RE: Is it common for submisives to be seriously Dominant in their Public and Professional life?ly (10/6/2013 7:27:03 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: JeffBC

~fast reply~
Just to round out this discussion for the sake of the OP (whom I kinda like), it's worth pointing out that Carol doesn't fit this model of "individualist, strong-willed submissive". There are also people who are just plain submissive as a default mindset. Those sort of people are, I suspect, much less likely to post in a place like collarme so the ratio seen here is, I suspect, not representative of the larger population. I can attest to the fact that they were quite common in both the Sacramento and Seattle MAsT meetings I attended.

I think the OP's experience if far from unique, but it is not ubiquitous.


Yeah, I fit in more like Carol. Even at work, my boss wishes I would be more assertive with employees but it really just tires me out and I just have a hard time doing it until I'm pushed to the brink and I absolutely have to. It's just not who I am as a person but I do it when I have to and only because I'm being forced to for my own survival.




Christhulhu -> RE: Is it common for submisives to be seriously Dominant in their Public and Professional life?ly (10/6/2013 8:56:34 AM)

So I probably fit the assertive sub paradigm. Creating and presenting ideas and having them critiqued on a daily basis naturally requires a bit of confidence.
Yet on a personal level, I'm generally on the sub side of balanced. This on top of being attracted to people capable of ting me up put's me into the sub category for in the bedroom.
So it's sort of a sliding scale from assertive (not dominant) to submissive depending on the level of personal involvement required.

I can't say they're completely unrelated for me but I can see how for some people; being dominant in the workplace doesn't dictate how they are in the 'bedroom' (either submissive or dominant)

Don't forget we are also laking the vanilla perspective. I'm sure there's a parallel drawn between dominance in public and in private within vanilla too.




njlauren -> RE: Is it common for submisives to be seriously Dominant in their Public and Professional life?ly (10/6/2013 11:02:22 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Charles6682

One of the biggest "reasons" people feel male subs were justified in their submission, is because they must have been a major CEO and needed a break from being in control. While I don't doubt this is true, it just seemed like it was a way to make powerful male subs feel "okay". So, what about all the many subs who didn't have endless money to afford private sessions? What was their excuse?

Charles, I think you are confusing some things here, and without using the term 'real' , because it is so loaded, there are different kinds of submission IME.

What you are describing is a common perception of the pro domme dynamic, and there is truth to it, where these uber alpha types go there to blow off steam, to give up control, to 'submit'. Having been in that world as a client, there is some truth to that. I made friends with a lot of pro dommes over the years, and one of the things they often complained about was that type of man would come in and want to 'submit', yet would treat them like their subordinates, demand things, etc (I kind of believe them, one of the things pro dommes would often talk about after we did a session was it was great to have someone who treated them in and out of session with respect and was pleasant to deal with). My take on these guys they did the session to blow off steam, as a kind of fantasy things, but weren't really submissive in the sense we are talking about, it is different. Remember that in most pro sessions, despite all the claims about submitting,it is often more about the domme doing the client, not the client really serving (and I am not looking down on it, just using it to explain). I think this is where the concept of 'it is okay to be sub, because they are high powered men just needing to have a place where they can let go'...and in this case, lot of truth. BTW, there are some women who go to pro dommes for the same reason, though they are a lot more scarce, maybe because many of them can 'let go' at home or whatever more easily than men can.

There are people who go to pros to submit, where they literally give over control to the domme, where they are submissive and this is how they play it out, maybe because they can't in their real relationships, etc. In a sense, that was my story, it started off as more 'do me', and it evolved, and ended up in my life, so that goes on. One pro domme who I both had sessions with and played with had a high power female sub who came in, and she was like that, my friend said the woman was truly sub, and she could do a lot with her, it was totally with what she wanted to do with her, it was de facto almost an owned relationship, albeit within the limits of a pro session (my friend liked her and having her serve, but would not want her as her own for real, not that strong a bond). From what I heard from my friend, the woman left her marriage and ended up with a woman dominant, and I hear they had this incredible TPE relationship, intense to a level I would never want to do....

I think the key thing is recognizing there are different types of dominants and submissives. For submissives, some of them are so submissive they could submit to anyone, like in stories of the wife who gets into trouble because they can submit to anyone (yeah, I know, not a great example..), there are men who are not anywhere near alpha in their real life, are not forceful or presenting with anyone. There also are people who in their work life are leaders, who are very commanding, etc, who are submissive in their personal life but only to a certain person. That kind of describes me, I am not submissive to someone where it doesn't click, and it makes my lady/spouse very happy, on top of everything else she would be worried about someone taking advantage of me if I wasn't like that. Someone can be very pliant with the dominant (which I am not totally....:), and be a wolf outside, it all depends. IME, some dominants want a sub who seems like Jeff's Carol, others want the challenge of a a sub who is more of a challenge, depends on the dominant, too.




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.125