DesideriScuri
Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: DomKen quote:
ORIGINAL: Phydeaux A 2011 IRS document named 162 groups — along with comments by IRS lawyers in Washington. Just 11 of those were liberal or "progressive" in political orientation. The political bias is absolutely clear. only to complete morons. The fact is 501(c)4 organizations are not, by law, supposed to engage in politics. Liberal and progressive groups did not seek the status because they did not want to hide their donors and they chose to not break the law, the reason the tea party groups sought the status. Yet, of the groups that were held up, only liberal groups were denied status (3, I believe). Makes you wonder how the rest got through the system, doesn't it? quote:
The real scandal is why any political group was granted the status at all. That's a dumb statement. Would you prefer to pay taxes, or to keep your tax money? In a noble manner, I'm sure you have no problem paying your taxes, and I'm not questioning that. But, if you are trying to raise money, wouldn't it be easier to raise money if you weren't required to pay taxes, and donations carried tax exemptions? You want to know who donates? How much you want to bet the IRS has a data-mining expert (if not an entire department)? Isn't there a section in your tax returns where you have to declare where your donations went? I know I have to identify the Salvation Army on mine.
_____________________________
What I support: - A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
- Personal Responsibility
- Help for the truly needy
- Limited Government
- Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)
|