Mercnbeth
Posts: 11766
Status: offline
|
Fury, "Cookie Cutter"? No, but beth and I were talking yesterday about the "merit badge" mentality that we've lately been observing more often. It's the other sharp side of the double edged sword of BDSM becoming more visible. Not accepted, but visible. "Hot Topics" is a place where suburban parents take their 13 year old replicants. CM has over 100,000 members. Now you can observe. You don't necessarily see something you want or desire, but you see something different. All you know is that you are not "happy" with your life; BDSM presents another, why not try it? Coming to the table with that mindset what do you do? You buy costumes based upon a marketer's idea of what a fashionable 'lifestyle' person should wear. You watch the 'Secretary' or '9 1/2 Weeks' and see the characters as role models. You call yourself a slave or, master, without any required counterpart and argue how your self identifying label defines you and distinguishes you from a submissive or dominant. After you are appropriated labeled as you start your journey. Now you go an collect experiences because, after all, that's how you can be "real". You brave a single tail, you experience 25 different floggers, your nipples have been clamped with everything from a clothespin to battery cables. Then you can't wait to post about the experience and earn your 'community' name badge. You want to make sure you get validation that you experience 'true' sub-space. You want to make sure your doing it 'right'. You want to be the first on your block to 'come out' and resent people who dare attempt to take the spotlight from you. The lifestyle shouldn't be about style, but should be about life. Not requiring a 24/7 commitment, but requiring that it be a full commitment that even a minute spent be about fulfillment of a personal desire, not as a 'cure' for unhappiness. The "cookie cutter" image, or the "merit badge" mentality is perceived as the obvious and easiest way to gain access. There is current thread about a "fetish-wear" requirement to go to an event. So, if you don't want to stop off at Hot Topics on your way to the event I guess you can go to the door and say your fetish was wearing pink satin underwear under your three piece business suit. Can they argue it's not? It's also a matter of confidence. Going in a business suit can make you feel out of place if everyone else is sporting the latest in leather. Nude or in a business suit, it's still YOU! Are you comfortable in the clothes you are wearing when you are wearing no clothes? We are fortunate to live in a time of access. It's appropriate that there is no gatekeeper. Appreciate the access and keep in mind validity of how people represent themselves. We don't think there is any more or less of anybody, just more. We haven't "lost our uniqueness". But shouting "we are ALL individuals!" in mass isn't proof of the fact. It's not caring about observing, what any of us feel, is 'negative' behavior or 'negative' representation of the 'lifestyle'. This was a long winded way to get to a simple reply of, "so what?". People trying earn merit badges or fit into cookie cutters are the cause we have so much access. There is now a larger market creating lower prices for goods and a growing 'slightly used' flea market segment.
|