|
DaddySatyr -> RE: Is the US Constitution and bill of rights an living and evolving document? (9/6/2013 6:01:40 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri Living and evolving? Um, not exactly. The SCOTUS isn't required to make rulings on new technology. The Constitution includes many ideals that include new technology, without that technology needing to be named. The right to keep and bear arms. That isn't limited to muskets and revolvers. Free speech includes email, blogs, etc. It's the value and ideal, not the exact specifics, and not limited to what they had at that exact date and time. It can be changed, but it doesn't change simply through the passing of time. quote:
In 1787, there was a sizable block of delegates who were initially opposed to the Bill of Rights. This is what a member of the Georgia delegation had to say by way of opposition; 'If we list a set of rights, some fools in the future are going to claim that people are entitled only to those rights enumerated and no others. and the government has been trying to do just that almost my entire adult life.
|
|
|
|