New York Times Goes After The Clinton Foundation

New York Times Goes After The Clinton Foundation (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

FatDomDaddy -> New York Times Goes After The Clinton Foundation (8/14/2013 7:49:42 PM)
So I wonder who has it out for the Mrs.? Unease at Clinton Foundation Over Finances and Ambitions

RottenJohnny -> RE: New York Times Goes After The Clinton Foundation (8/15/2013 4:20:49 AM)
What a surprise...an organization run by politicians that can't control a budget. Where have I seen that before?

FatDomDaddy -> RE: New York Times Goes After The Clinton Foundation (8/15/2013 6:12:32 AM)
I love how they are primed and ready to throw their daughter under the bus.

RottenJohnny -> RE: New York Times Goes After The Clinton Foundation (8/15/2013 6:17:38 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: FatDomDaddy I love how they are primed and ready to throw their daughter under the bus. That's because she's the only one of them with any credibility. Hope she's ready for the really big hangover that's coming her way.

DaddySatyr -> RE: New York Times Goes After The Clinton Foundation (8/15/2013 6:32:17 AM)
Ahhhh yes! That bastion of the right-wing conspiracy, The New York Times must have it in for the former Commander-In-Heat and the anti-Christ, herself. Those poor, poor, Clintons who never did anything to anybody (except Gennifer Flowers, Monica Lewinski, a bunch of gun nuts in Texas, some people in a federal building in OKC, and an embassy detail). I feel their pain.

FatDomDaddy -> RE: New York Times Goes After The Clinton Foundation (8/15/2013 4:20:49 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: RottenJohnny quote: ORIGINAL: FatDomDaddy I love how they are primed and ready to throw their daughter under the bus. That's because she's the only one of them with any credibility. Hope she's ready for the really big hangover that's coming her way. *“We’re trying to institutionalize the foundation so that it will be here long after the lives of any of us*,” Hey... she needs to learn what it is to take one for the team. Funny though.... away from probate... I really thought the left hated tying up money long after the actual earner left the scene???

ABitchlikethat -> RE: New York Times Goes After The Clinton Foundation (8/15/2013 4:26:24 PM)
DaddySatyr-- Can you enlighten me as to the exact percentage of your paycheck that goes to welfare recipients?

DaddySatyr -> RE: New York Times Goes After The Clinton Foundation (8/15/2013 4:36:27 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ABitchlikethat DaddySatyr-- Can you enlighten me as to the exact percentage of your paycheck that goes to welfare recipients? Well, first: That's a signature line and I'd be happy to answer your quesdtion in an appropriate thread. Second: I will say this about it: It's not about my being unwilling to help people that are truly needy. It's about my having to take a urine test (or be willing to, at this point) to either obtain or maintain employment while there are people, sitting at home, smoking fatties, eating chips and playing video games. You want a hand-out? You prove that you legitimately can't work or that you are living your life in a way that you're honestly looking for work.

RottenJohnny -> RE: New York Times Goes After The Clinton Foundation (8/15/2013 5:58:34 PM)
quote: “We’re trying to institutionalize the foundation so that it will be here long after the lives of any of us." Left-wing speak for, "Let's see if we can turn this into a branch of government and make taxpayers foot the bill." quote: Hey... she needs to learn what it is to take one for the team. Unfortunately, I think she's been taking one since she came out of the womb. What better way to have your political ambitions look more humane than to have a kid? If that girl manages to make it through life without becoming an alcoholic I'll be amazed. quote: Funny though.... away from probate... I really thought the left hated tying up money long after the actual earner left the scene??? Since when have they ever hesitated to find ways of redistributing wealth?

JeffBC -> RE: New York Times Goes After The Clinton Foundation (8/15/2013 8:17:45 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: RottenJohnny What a surprise...an organization run by politicians that can't control a budget. Where have I seen that before? Wall Street? Oh no, that's bankers and financial geniuses not politicians. My bad.

RottenJohnny -> RE: New York Times Goes After The Clinton Foundation (8/15/2013 8:29:06 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: JeffBC Wall Street? Oh no, that's bankers and financial geniuses not politicians. My bad. Not that there's really any difference in effect.

Page: [1]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

3.320313E-02