Fightdirecto
Posts: 1101
Joined: 8/3/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: DomKen I'd wait for the sentencing before getting too happy. He's facing something like 120 years if the judge gives him the maximum on each count. IMO, his conviction on those charges was warranted and, if it turns out he gets a 120 year sentence, so be it. But I think the Court was right to acquit him on the "aiding the enemy" charge. The prosecution's argument that if some bad guy read something in a newspaper or a book that might aid the bad guy, the journalist or historian and their source were all guilty of "aiding the enemy", would be dangerous for the freedom of the press. Imagine "Tricky Dick" Nixon having Woodward and Bernstein jailed on the grounds that their newspaper reporting on Watergate might be read by the Communist Chinese or the Soviets in the old USSR and was therefore "aiding the enemy". The reporters might have gone to prison and that asshole Nixon would never been impeached and forced to resign the Presidency,
< Message edited by Fightdirecto -- 7/30/2013 2:35:23 PM >
_____________________________
"I swore never to be silent whenever and wherever human beings endure suffering and humiliation. We must always take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented.”” - Ellie Wiesel
|