RE: Renewable energy equals (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


DesideriScuri -> RE: Renewable energy equals (5/3/2013 9:40:43 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
It is nowhere near subsidized to the tune of big oil. Every other government in the world is that involved in industrial policy that is handing us our ass right now. 


How do you figure that? You can talk about $ amount and that would be the case, but as a %? I don't think that's accurate.




samboct -> RE: Renewable energy equals (5/3/2013 9:54:02 AM)

I'm going to play dirty pool here- I'm going to muddy things by adding a few facts to the debate.

1) Solar still accounts for less than 1% of our energy consumption in the US. We've got a ways to go before solar installation jobs evaporate. We don't worry about housing construction jobs- do we? However, manufacturing of PV panels is a highly automated, capital intensive process- the jobs are in building the plant.
2) China has badly screwed up in the PV market. PV panel (not module) prices have been in free fall. Crystalline Si panels have fallen from about $1.90/watt in 2010 to about $0.63/watt now. This was because the bank of China (there is only one bank in China) gave loans to companies using physical plant as collateral. Given the glut on the market, this was an expensive strategy. The Bank of China will now only give loans based on projects.
3) In 2010- module producers had about a 30% margin. Its a lot lower now. I don't know how anyone can make money producing PV panels now.
4) In countries like India and other parts of the developing world though- PV and wind are the lowest cost option since diesel generation is the competition.
5) It's still difficult to estimate the subsidy of gas/oil. Historically, probably 1/3rd of our military budget went to securing the world's oil transportation network- especially in the Mideast.
6) In terms of oil- the US is now ranked #3 globally, behind Saudi Arabia and Russia. If Canada's tar sands are added in--we're #1. Combined with gas, this is why we're now a net energy exporter.
7) There is no carbon tax on oil/gas/coal. Absent a carbon tax, it's impossible to tell what subsidies or price supports existing technologies receive.
8) Permitting of PV in Cali. is a nightmare. Approx. 1/3rd of the costs are "soft cost" i.e. permitting. One of the reasons that Germany has much greater utilization of PV is the lower permitting costs and the speed of installation- same in Japan. This cost is not inherent to the technology- much of it is due to utilities intransigence.
9) Rooftop leasing in the US is an artificial phenomena because of tax incentives for businesses that allow full depreciation of a panel compared to 30% for homeowners. Other parts of the world- people own the panels on their roofs.
10) By 2015, I think the forecast PV market is 20 GW with the US being about a quarter of that. China has been ramping up its consumption considerably. China is now far and away the largest market for wind power- most of the new production that's come online in the last couple of years in China has been used domestically. I think the wind market is between 2 and 3x the size of the PV industry.

There- that should give some of you a few things to think over...


Sam




mnottertail -> RE: Renewable energy equals (5/3/2013 9:58:59 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
It is nowhere near subsidized to the tune of big oil. Every other government in the world is that involved in industrial policy that is handing us our ass right now. 


How do you figure that? You can talk about $ amount and that would be the case, but as a %? I don't think that's accurate.



even as a percentage.  big oil has been subsidized since about 1913 directly and of course that does not include the Ohio River stuff, and so on.




FunCouple5280 -> RE: Renewable energy equals (5/3/2013 10:09:37 AM)

1) Solar still accounts for less than 1% of our energy consumption in the US. We've got a ways to go before solar installation jobs evaporate. We don't worry about housing construction jobs- do we? However, manufacturing of PV panels is a highly automated, capital intensive process- the jobs are in building the plant. Yet if we are buying foriegn panels the money goes eslewhere
2) China has badly screwed up in the PV market. PV panel (not module) prices have been in free fall. Crystalline Si panels have fallen from about $1.90/watt in 2010 to about $0.63/watt now. This was because the bank of China (there is only one bank in China) gave loans to companies using physical plant as collateral. Given the glut on the market, this was an expensive strategy. The Bank of China will now only give loans based on projects. The Chinese need a good spanking
3) In 2010- module producers had about a 30% margin. Its a lot lower now. I don't know how anyone can make money producing PV panels now. Most manufacturing is a at 10% therefore as long as they are near that they should be fine....However, the US is preventing the construction of more silicon refineries, which is vital to the cost of the industry and we are importing that as well
4) In countries like India and other parts of the developing world though- PV and wind are the lowest cost option since diesel generation is the competition. In rural areas thats true, however who there can afford the massive upfront capital of AE systems. We have been playing in the 3rd worlf for 3 years with very little traction.
5) It's still difficult to estimate the subsidy of gas/oil. Historically, probably 1/3rd of our military budget went to securing the world's oil transportation network- especially in the Mideast. That's why I asked
6) In terms of oil- the US is now ranked #3 globally, behind Saudi Arabia and Russia. If Canada's tar sands are added in--we're #1. Combined with gas, this is why we're now a net energy exporter. good for our economy
7) There is no carbon tax on oil/gas/coal. Absent a carbon tax, it's impossible to tell what subsidies or price supports existing technologies receive. I hate the notion of a carbon tax (we breath and produce carbon, and trees are technically a renewable resource), first ditch the paleo subsidies, then go after not emissions but efficiency
8) Permitting of PV in Cali. is a nightmare. Approx. 1/3rd of the costs are "soft cost" i.e. permitting. One of the reasons that Germany has much greater utilization of PV is the lower permitting costs and the speed of installation- same in Japan. This cost is not inherent to the technology- much of it is due to utilities intransigence. Cali is fucked up and it is their fault much of it to do with left wing environmental conflicts---they want the PV to save the plante but won't harm a beatle to do it, so it is a merry-go-round of shit. Permitting is easy here in CO
9) Rooftop leasing in the US is an artificial phenomena because of tax incentives for businesses that allow full depreciation of a panel compared to 30% for homeowners. Other parts of the world- people own the panels on their roofs. If you only knew how corrupt the leasors are and how they are raping the tax payer, you would ban them.






DesideriScuri -> RE: Renewable energy equals (5/3/2013 10:15:27 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
It is nowhere near subsidized to the tune of big oil. Every other government in the world is that involved in industrial policy that is handing us our ass right now. 

How do you figure that? You can talk about $ amount and that would be the case, but as a %? I don't think that's accurate.

even as a percentage.  big oil has been subsidized since about 1913 directly and of course that does not include the Ohio River stuff, and so on.


Can't go back and change that shit now, Ron. Trying to make up for not supporting something that wasn't really in existence is disingenuous.






DomKen -> RE: Renewable energy equals (5/3/2013 10:22:25 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
Actually going to be more like hundreds of permanent jobs for maintenance.

35 actually.
http://www.csmonitor.com/Environment/Energy-Voices/2013/0308/Keystone-XL-pipeline-will-create-35-permanent-jobs-State-Department-says




FunCouple5280 -> RE: Renewable energy equals (5/3/2013 10:40:36 AM)

Well the big debate in my mind is whether the tax payer is coughing up a dime on the XL pipeline....if not so be it, just give'em the permits




Hillwilliam -> RE: Renewable energy equals (5/3/2013 10:51:06 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: FunCouple5280

Well the big debate in my mind is whether the tax payer is coughing up a dime on the XL pipeline....if not so be it, just give'em the permits

If it's a typical infrastructure project, the governments involved must first purchase the rights of way at taxpayer expense. (Hundreds of Millions)

That's one reason I have wondered many times why the Keystone XL isn't beng built alongside the existing Keystone line. The ROW is already there along with the needed infrastructure.




samboct -> RE: Renewable energy equals (5/3/2013 11:02:42 AM)

It's debatable whether crystalline Si is really the way to go in PV. I tend to like thin film technology, although I like Semprius technology as well. The US hasn't got much hope in terms of catching up in crystalline Si PV- Sunpower already has 24% efficiency cells shipping (theoretical max of 29%) and China's got overwhelming capacity. The best hope for the US is for panels which work well where crystalline Si doesn't-i.e. thin film or high efficiency concentrator PV. I'm not very worried about Si boules- the price keeps falling since they're no longer competing with electronics mfg.

Exporting fuels which increase global climate change is not good for our economy. In the Northeast, we've had several storms in the past two years with costs in the tens of billions of $$- storms which were far more likely due to the additional CO2 we've dumped into our atmosphere. You guys in Colorado may not have to worry- but we do. And we don't get much boost from states that sell liquid fuel.

Bully for Colorado- but Cali is not the only problem state- so is that Republican hotbed, Arizona.

About a carbon tax- I'm far less interested in what's ideologically correct and far more interested in solving some real world problems both economic and environmental. My approach is pragmatic- I want something that works. Your argument about CO2 is deeply flawed based on the relative contributions of the sources/sinks you mentioned. The largest CO2 sink by the way is in the ocean. If this stops working, our environment starts changing very rapidly indeed- enough so that even living in Colorado- you might notice something different.

Sam




mnottertail -> RE: Renewable energy equals (5/3/2013 2:14:03 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
It is nowhere near subsidized to the tune of big oil. Every other government in the world is that involved in industrial policy that is handing us our ass right now. 

How do you figure that? You can talk about $ amount and that would be the case, but as a %? I don't think that's accurate.

even as a percentage.  big oil has been subsidized since about 1913 directly and of course that does not include the Ohio River stuff, and so on.


Can't go back and change that shit now, Ron. Trying to make up for not supporting something that wasn't really in existence is disingenuous.





Thats what I am saying, can't change that shit now, but do I know what wasnt supported nor dont know what wasnt in existence, and therefore how  that is disingenuous.


We could tax the shit out of them or nationalize them. it would mitigate the thing.




DomKen -> RE: Renewable energy equals (5/3/2013 2:23:05 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: FunCouple5280

Well the big debate in my mind is whether the tax payer is coughing up a dime on the XL pipeline....if not so be it, just give'em the permits

When the pipeline inevitably leaks* into the ogallala aquifer, the one most of the midwest farms depend on, we will certainly pay then beyond whatever costs occur when it's built.

*all pipelines are rated for loss per kilometer. Moving bitumen that has been diluted with the stuff needed to get it liquid increases that loss.




FunCouple5280 -> RE: Renewable energy equals (5/3/2013 2:26:53 PM)

Is it a forgone conclusion that all that leakage ends up in the ground? at the rate of leakage, how quickly will it be bacterially digest relatively to its migration into ground water?

Just curious what the real impact is. If it really is going to poison the Aquafer, then many safeties need to be put into place.




DomKen -> RE: Renewable energy equals (5/3/2013 2:40:11 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: FunCouple5280

Is it a forgone conclusion that all that leakage ends up in the ground? at the rate of leakage, how quickly will it be bacterially digest relatively to its migration into ground water?

Just curious what the real impact is. If it really is going to poison the Aquafer, then many safeties need to be put into place.

Some is gunk buildup on the inside of the pipe. The problem is the stuff is mildly corrosive so if the pipeline isn't shut down and a cleaning device sent through frequently you will have leaks. Some is actual leakage through failing joints etc.

If it was an above ground pipeline like the Alaskan it could be monitored for leaks but since it will be buried the only notice we will have is when a major failure occurs.




FunCouple5280 -> RE: Renewable energy equals (5/3/2013 3:07:06 PM)

not good




mnottertail -> RE: Renewable energy equals (5/3/2013 3:11:28 PM)

somewhere around here I once linked to a report (not from the american petroleum institute, btw.... but like the EPA) that gave out spills frequency and size total and size average by type.

Pipelines won hands down even with the BP deepwater and the Exxon Valdez stuff, since there is so much pipeline accross our nation, believe the average spill was 100 bbls per.

But I cannot find the damn thing, but it was on a hysterical right wing cant on the XL pipeline. 




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875