|
njlauren -> RE: David Frum: "Straight marriage is the real issue" (3/25/2013 10:04:19 PM)
|
The answer to the question is that statistics are like the whore with the perfect makeup, they look very tempting when viewed from 50 feet away, at 10 they look like uncle charlie in a dress (or maybe it is uncle charlie in a dress...). The problem with numbers they give is they are just numbers. For example, that 48% of kids are being born out of wedlock, and that sounds horrible (and it is, in one sense), but it makes it sound like you go anywhere, and you will see half the kids born into poverty violence, etc.and it leaves out that not all kids born to single parents are born into poverty, or necessarily will be screwed up..... Okay, so how to make sense of this: -It is skewed by the rate of single moms/teen moms, in certain groups. Among blacks, it is about 80% born to unwed mothers, many of them poor, uneducated and so forth, and that is going to skew it. -Among whites, I think the number is about 30% (not great, but still). But then, we have to ask, is a kid born to a single parent necessarily a bad thing..well, not necessarily. While it probably doesn't represent a huge number, you have middle class, upper middle class and well off woman who decide they want to have a kid, though not married, they use sperm donors or have it by a boyfriend by choice, they have the means to raise the kids, but don't get married..and many of these kids do just fine..... Then, too, statistically, because they cannot marry, kids born to gays are classified as being born to single mothers. I believe they also classify babies born to a surrogate mom that way, which is idiotic (and also is not a big number, granted). I think the real issue is a lot of the kids born out of wedlock are born to poor women, and that is the problem, whatever the real number is. In countries like Sweden, a lot of the babies are born out of wedlock, but it is no big deal, because for one, it is because a lot of people don't formally marry but still have a family, and among the ones who are single parents, Sweden is a relatively well off, educated country, so the single moms can take care of them, plus they enjoy support services like childcare we don't have in the US. Don't get me wrong, it is a serious problem, it is one of the major causes of urban and rural poverty, and it leads to a cycle of this happening over and over again, but it has been going on a long time (Pat Moynihan wrote about it in the black community more then 50 years ago). In a nutshell, it is a serious problem where kids are being born to single, poor mothers, and it does need to be dealt with.... And yeah, it is ironic, when we hear that denying gays the right to marry is going to save marriage. The black preachers who are so opposed to same sex marriage might be better served to address the ills in their own community, with marriage and childbirth; the preachers down south ranting and raving about gay marriage being armegeddon, might be better served to try and lower the divorce, adultery and spousal abuse figures in their own communities, since the bible belt is generally higher in these things them some of the 'liberal' states. Whether gays are 3%, 5%, or 10%, the fact is, allowing them to marry has zero to do with straight marriages, zero to do with out of wedlock births, and is unlikely to cause any kind of problems, other then in the religious droolers empty brain pans. In actuality, they aren't trying to deny gays the right to marry per se, it has nothing to do with God striking us down, the real reason they fight it is because they see this as government saying gays are the same as straights, and they don't want that, they want to use the government to make gays second class citizens,deny them rights, to 'keep them in their place'..what they really fear is what has happened, people see same sex marriage in other states, scratch their heads and say "so? What's the big fuss? I am still married, my husband hasn't run away with Steve or Bruce, the world hasn't come to an end, so who gives a shit?" *lol*
|
|
|
|