|
RumpusParable -> RE: cash dommes (12/5/2012 9:36:36 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: igor2003 quote:
ORIGINAL: RumpusParable We see this rant all the time...but the reality is that there aren't *that* many of *that* type of findoms here. I'm not really sure what you mean by "that many of that type", but I will definitely agree that the numbers aren't 99.9%. I just searched for female dominants and did a random clicking of around 12 profiles and not one was a findom of any type. And one was outright stating they want to spoil and financially support their sub. Just curious about what you used as your search criteria. After reading your post I wanted to see for myself what the numbers were. I searched for female dominants, aged 18 and up. I would hit "search" and check the one at the top of the list, then hit "search" again, and again take the one at the top of the list unless it was one that had come up previously. I checked 40 different profiles (okay, so I was bored and waiting for breakfast to cook!) and the results I came up with was 14 out of 40 were seeking tributes, seeking payment (pro-dommes), looking for "pay pigs", claimed to be "wallet rapers", or in any way looking for gifts or cash, sometimes in exchange for attention, but sometimes not offering anything at all for what they receive. That works out to 35% of the total. Nowhere near the 99.9% claimed in the OP, but still a fairly significant number. And the ages ranged from 21 to 57 for those asking for some kind of "payment", so claiming that it is only the young, pretty, ones doing the asking is not necessarily the case as so many people on the boards often claim. You may want to consider what your search and profile-viewing habits are if you're running into that many findom profiles here. If someone is searching mainly for those dommes that are under, say...30, then most likely the numbers are going to be quite a bit higher than the way I searched. Again, still not 99.9%. As I was doing my search I did start to wonder if the percentages might be higher in different parts of the country, but even I am not bored enough to do THAT much searching! Hiya! I just re-did it to see what another go would be since we had a good difference in numbers. This time, out of 20, none were findoms, 3 were pro-doms and one of them was seeking lifestyle partners with just a note at the bottom of her profile saying that if you were a random guy or girl seeking a passing-by session that you could contact her in a professional capacity. The oldest of the two findoms I noticed was 22. Can't recall the other one's exact age. My method was setting the search to dominant females of all ages, then loading pages and clicking randomly on names without reading them so as to try not to influence my results. Going the opposite direction of doing what I get the impression most people making and complaining in these type of threads are doing, I then searched female dominants under 25 and picked names that came across as fetishy "hot". 8/10 with 6 being findoms and 2 being pros.
|
|
|
|