Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

Is Wal Mart Socialist?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Is Wal Mart Socialist? Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Is Wal Mart Socialist? - 11/25/2012 4:57:57 PM   
Hillwilliam


Posts: 19394
Joined: 8/27/2008
Status: offline
I know it seems inflamatory but hang with me folks.

Wal Mart isn't exactly known for paying a so-called 'living wage' but a lot of folks have no other choice so they work there.
As a result, these people frequently end up recieving Taxpayer funded state and federal assistance in the form of nutritional assisitance, Section 8 housing, utilities assistance, Communications subsidies, etc. As shown in another thread, these cost the state of Cali alone $86 Million. If you were to add in federal assistance and extrapolate over the other 49 states, DC and the territories, this number could easily push a Billion dollars of taxpayer money.
Every nickel of this ends up subsidizing Wal Mart's bottom line.

Isn't that how some of you folks define Socialism?

Discussion?

< Message edited by Hillwilliam -- 11/25/2012 4:58:45 PM >


_____________________________

Kinkier than a cheap garden hose.

Whoever said "Religion is the opiate of the masses" never heard Right Wing talk radio.

Don't blame me, I voted for Gary Johnson.
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: Is Wal Mart Socialist? - 11/25/2012 5:09:03 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
Its not the state of California... its one county.. LA County.. and the actual cost is around 1.6 billion a year. But he was talking about illegals... and not those who are legally here and struggling anyways.

http://losangeles.cbslocal.com/2011/01/20/report-la-county-welfare-benefits-for-illegals-top-600m/

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to Hillwilliam)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: Is Wal Mart Socialist? - 11/25/2012 7:32:29 PM   
stellauk


Posts: 1360
Status: offline
Don't think so..

Marx is all about the worker owning the means of their production. Socialism is all about labour, a sense of community, having solidarity ingrained, working towards a society based on ability and need rather than desire and greed, having a sense of pride in one's work and one's community.

I'd rather say Walmart is a shining example of right wing politics and the free market economy - maximum profit for minimum cost, the utilitarian attitude towards the human being who has to be productive and profitable to have any value in society, the heavy reliance of exploitation of its workers, wanting all the privileges of being in business but none of the responsibilities, the sense of entitlement, and..

.. the 'f*ck you Jack I'm alright' attitude..

Socialism is what would help America out of its current economic situation but America is the dude with the broken leg in plaster in ER who says 'Nah, don't need those crutches..' as he tries to hop out of the building and make it home.

_____________________________

Usually when you have all the answers for something nobody is interested in listening.

(in reply to Hillwilliam)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: Is Wal Mart Socialist? - 11/26/2012 8:52:53 AM   
meatcleaver


Posts: 9030
Joined: 3/13/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam
Wal Mart isn't exactly known for paying a so-called 'living wage' but a lot of folks have no other choice so they work there.
As a result, these people frequently end up recieving Taxpayer funded state and federal assistance in the form of nutritional assisitance, Section 8 housing, utilities assistance, Communications subsidies, etc. As shown in another thread, these cost the state of Cali alone $86 Million. If you were to add in federal assistance and extrapolate over the other 49 states, DC and the territories, this number could easily push a Billion dollars of taxpayer money.
Every nickel of this ends up subsidizing Wal Mart's bottom line.

Isn't that how some of you folks define Socialism?

Discussion?


No, it's western corporate capitalism, a system where the rich exploit the poor and private companies leach off the state. If Wal-mart was socialist, it would be owned by the state, not subsidised by the state.

< Message edited by meatcleaver -- 11/26/2012 8:53:33 AM >


_____________________________

There are fascists who consider themselves humanitarians, like cannibals on a health kick, eating only vegetarians.

(in reply to Hillwilliam)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: Is Wal Mart Socialist? - 11/26/2012 8:56:10 AM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: stellauk
...the utilitarian attitude towards the human being who has to be productive and profitable to have any value in society...

Are you quite sure that's the attitude Mill and Bentham had in mind?

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to stellauk)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: Is Wal Mart Socialist? - 11/26/2012 12:03:47 PM   
tj444


Posts: 7574
Joined: 3/7/2010
Status: offline
Awwww... Hilly, why ya picking on poor Walmart!??? wouldnt the same hold true for all companies that dont pay a "living wage"?

Come on here, the real problem is govt itself!.. they create laws (wage, benefit, health care, etc) but then insert "loopholes" ya could drive a truck thru! So of course companies will hire part-timers (which if you work less hours, reduces your monthly salary to basically "unliveable").. Seriously, if govt actually did care one poop for the working poor, they would create laws that would apply (prorated) to all regardless of how many hours they worked.. but that is what voters get when they vote for the 1%, which most politicians are, both Ds & Rs..

< Message edited by tj444 -- 11/26/2012 12:04:26 PM >


_____________________________

As Anderson Cooper said “If he (Trump) took a dump on his desk, you would defend it”

(in reply to Hillwilliam)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: Is Wal Mart Socialist? - 11/26/2012 12:57:34 PM   
subspaceseven


Posts: 467
Joined: 3/2/2012
Status: offline
if you want to see socialism in action visit Alaska, where the people enjoy the profits of the land...Hmmm Sarah never discussed this, nor do the GOP in any state which everyone has a say ...like Green Bay with the publicly owned Packers..I guess in these cases the GOP is OK with socialism cause they can't be heard bitching...or if they are please list the links

(in reply to Hillwilliam)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: Is Wal Mart Socialist? - 11/26/2012 6:42:35 PM   
fucktoyprincess


Posts: 2337
Status: offline
Oy....did you not get the memo that it's only "socialist" when poor people and children get things like food stamps so they don't have to starve?

When agribusiness, retail establishments, investment banks, commercial banks, etc. get money it's called capitalism.

_____________________________

~ ftp

(in reply to Hillwilliam)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: Is Wal Mart Socialist? - 11/26/2012 7:02:25 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
http://underthemountainbunker.com/2012/02/25/walmart-costs-taxpayers-1557000000-the-conservative-circle-of-life/

http://www.walmartmovie.com/facts.php

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to fucktoyprincess)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: Is Wal Mart Socialist? - 11/26/2012 7:11:07 PM   
servantforuse


Posts: 6363
Joined: 3/8/2006
Status: offline
Share holders, about 111,000 of them own the Green Bay Packers. How is that socialisim ? 

(in reply to subspaceseven)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: Is Wal Mart Socialist? - 11/26/2012 7:16:06 PM   
NefertariReborn


Posts: 381
Status: offline
I keep wondering if the people who like to cry "Socialist" actually KNOW what socialism is. I think most of them just parrot talking points they hear on conservative media. Ask them to define it on the spot and it's clear they don't have a clue. One sub recently told me Obama AND Romney are socialists in the purest sense of the word. REALLY? Needless to say we don't speak any more. I sent him a wiki link.

_____________________________

“Security is mostly a superstition…Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. Life is either a daring adventure or it is nothing at all.” -Helen Keller

“How will you become a clear mirror if you resent being polished

(in reply to servantforuse)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: Is Wal Mart Socialist? - 11/26/2012 7:18:18 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
Nefertari..the short answer is .... no...
but it sounds nastier than all "liberals are poopy heads"
same intellect.

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to NefertariReborn)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: Is Wal Mart Socialist? - 11/26/2012 7:20:08 PM   
Hillwilliam


Posts: 19394
Joined: 8/27/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: NefertariReborn

I keep wondering if the people who like to cry "Socialist" actually KNOW what socialism is. I think most of them just parrot talking points they hear on conservative media. Ask them to define it on the spot and it's clear they don't have a clue. One sub recently told me Obama AND Romney are socialists in the purest sense of the word. REALLY? Needless to say we don't speak any more. I sent him a wiki link.

That and pointing out partisan hypocricy was kinda my point in the OP.

_____________________________

Kinkier than a cheap garden hose.

Whoever said "Religion is the opiate of the masses" never heard Right Wing talk radio.

Don't blame me, I voted for Gary Johnson.

(in reply to NefertariReborn)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: Is Wal Mart Socialist? - 11/27/2012 12:58:45 AM   
meatcleaver


Posts: 9030
Joined: 3/13/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: NefertariReborn

I keep wondering if the people who like to cry "Socialist" actually KNOW what socialism is.


Of course they don't. It's similar to when people rant on about Marx, claiming he wrote or invented some unworkable ideology when over 95% of his writings are an analysis of capitalism.

Oh, and his analysis of capitalism is largely correct as we have seen in the current crisis. 

_____________________________

There are fascists who consider themselves humanitarians, like cannibals on a health kick, eating only vegetarians.

(in reply to NefertariReborn)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: Is Wal Mart Socialist? - 11/27/2012 3:58:53 PM   
Aswad


Posts: 9374
Joined: 4/4/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: stellauk

Marx is all about the worker owning the means of their production. Socialism is all about labour, a sense of community, having solidarity ingrained, working towards a society based on ability and need rather than desire and greed, having a sense of pride in one's work and one's community.


This is a very superficial analysis.

What Marx describes is another stage in human social evolution. The rest is what most consider to be the central element of his work, and indeed he did devote a lot of time and effort to it, but the real quantum leap is the notion of an organism in which individuals are cells in the proverbial machine of society. Corporate personhood is a microcosm of that, in a way, and gives a taste of some of the inherent problems of Marxism (though you start to notice some of them with the move to socialism, as well). Marx is seeing the almost inevitable collapse of nobility and obsoletion of quality. Fighting Marxism is extremely difficult, and you can only win the battles, not the war, but staving it off indefinitely is also the only thing unequivocally worth dying for to any human being whose right to live I would acknowledge.

The simplistic idea that it's somehow only a matter of the good of mutually beneficial socioeconomic relations (including welfare) as touted by well meaning people on the left, or the poison of communism and collectivism as touted by fearful people on the right, is selling short the horror that is Marxism on every point, and devaluing the useful, desireable things Marx realized in the course of his work (and, those, I have been advocating here). You can't refute Marx. You can only comprehend him well enough to know he has described the final enemy of humanity and then you can try to come up with ways to deal with that.

Hopefully, if we're ever on the verge of moving on to what Marx predicted, a timely world war will occur to blast us back to the Stone Age and thereby prevent it.

IWYW,
— Aswad.


_____________________________

"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind.
From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way.
We do.
" -- Rorschack, Watchmen.


(in reply to stellauk)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: Is Wal Mart Socialist? - 11/28/2012 1:06:36 AM   
meatcleaver


Posts: 9030
Joined: 3/13/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Aswad


This is a very superficial analysis.

What Marx describes is another stage in human social evolution. The rest is what most consider to be the central element of his work, and indeed he did devote a lot of time and effort to it, but the real quantum leap is the notion of an organism in which individuals are cells in the proverbial machine of society. Corporate personhood is a microcosm of that, in a way, and gives a taste of some of the inherent problems of Marxism (though you start to notice some of them with the move to socialism, as well). Marx is seeing the almost inevitable collapse of nobility and obsoletion of quality. Fighting Marxism is extremely difficult, and you can only win the battles, not the war, but staving it off indefinitely is also the only thing unequivocally worth dying for to any human being whose right to live I would acknowledge.

The simplistic idea that it's somehow only a matter of the good of mutually beneficial socioeconomic relations (including welfare) as touted by well meaning people on the left, or the poison of communism and collectivism as touted by fearful people on the right, is selling short the horror that is Marxism on every point, and devaluing the useful, desireable things Marx realized in the course of his work (and, those, I have been advocating here). You can't refute Marx. You can only comprehend him well enough to know he has described the final enemy of humanity and then you can try to come up with ways to deal with that.

Hopefully, if we're ever on the verge of moving on to what Marx predicted, a timely world war will occur to blast us back to the Stone Age and thereby prevent it.

IWYW,
— Aswad.



Aswad. You have obviously not read Marx or undertood what he wrote if you have. Over 95% of what he wrote was an analysis of capitalism, which he pretty much hits capitalism on the head.

As for his political writings, let me make it clear with a quote from Marx ´I am not a Marxist´. He said that about himself, meaning his thoughts are not an ideology carved in stone, his work is never done because for that he would have to stop thinking. Considering the working conditions at the time Marx & Engels were writing, Marx´s political thoughts were not in the least extreme. The average life expectancy in urban workers was down to thirty, food was contaminated by traders, slum landlords charged extortionate rents and hours at work were long, brutal and dangerous. Manchester had three cesspits for 300,000 people. One thing Marx didn´t realise, is that brutal red toothed capitalism and the aristocracy would retreat with the rise of the left and it is thanks to the left that we have decent homes and education and decent medical care for everyone. Well, in western Europe anyway. I don´t know how Obama´s modest health reforms are doing though I hear they are laughably called socialist or communists by idiots on the right.

What has given Marx a bad name is that many rebel and Guerilla groups called themselves Marxist to define themselves against ther hated capitalist enemy while it appears, hardly any read any Marx whatsoever. The point was they were against the oppressive imperialism of the west and to rally followers, they needed a badge and Marxism conveniently fitted because it scared western leaders. Ho Chi Min was more a nationalist than a communist, something the British Prime Minister recognised when he refused Johnson´s request to send British troops to Vietnam, saying it was a colonial war. Most Marxist groups have been more nationalist than Communist, Marxism is just a badge of convenience like ´democracy´ is a badge of convenience for western capitalism but if you stop for a secoind and analyse western capitalism, if you have an open mind, you realise it is nothing to do with democracy and everything to do with corporate capitalist control.

< Message edited by meatcleaver -- 11/28/2012 1:09:18 AM >


_____________________________

There are fascists who consider themselves humanitarians, like cannibals on a health kick, eating only vegetarians.

(in reply to Aswad)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: Is Wal Mart Socialist? - 11/28/2012 4:37:06 PM   
LookieNoNookie


Posts: 12216
Joined: 8/9/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam

I know it seems inflamatory but hang with me folks.

Wal Mart isn't exactly known for paying a so-called 'living wage' but a lot of folks have no other choice so they work there.
As a result, these people frequently end up recieving Taxpayer funded state and federal assistance in the form of nutritional assisitance, Section 8 housing, utilities assistance, Communications subsidies, etc. As shown in another thread, these cost the state of Cali alone $86 Million. If you were to add in federal assistance and extrapolate over the other 49 states, DC and the territories, this number could easily push a Billion dollars of taxpayer money.
Every nickel of this ends up subsidizing Wal Mart's bottom line.

Isn't that how some of you folks define Socialism?

Discussion?


It's amazing to me how many people hang WalMart out to dry when they have 8 katrillion people lining up to fill out applications to work every time a new store opens.

Add into that, they pay an average of $10.37 an hour or some such (could be wrong...it's above $10.00....and 60% of a shit health care plan)...and my firms pay 77% more AND 100% of a killer plan....

And I can't get 3 people to apply with ads in 7 newspapers or online sources.

But I don't get 37 news articles written up about my offer....because I didn't spend 3 katrillion dollars building a new building....which will produce 1.3 katrillion in monthly sales....ergo....the local gov ain't gonna bring my story to the table.

But let's leave that aside.....a kabillion people line up for jobs at WalMart.

At half of what I (and others) offer.

Stop blaming WalMart.

(in reply to Hillwilliam)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: Is Wal Mart Socialist? - 11/28/2012 6:25:54 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
Avg salary for Walmart associate is $8.83/hr

http://www.glassdoor.com/Hourly-Pay/Walmart-Stores-Sales-Associate-Hourly-Pay-E715_D_KO15,30.htm

An added note on salaries there.


US Department of Labor recovers $4.83 million in back wages, damages for more than 4,500 Wal-Mart workers

Misapplied exemption resulted in pay violations; nearly $464,000 assessed in penalties

WASHINGTON — Wal-Mart Stores Inc., headquartered in Bentonville, Ark., has agreed to pay $4,828,442 in back wages and damages to more than 4,500 employees nationwide following an investigation by the U.S. Department of Labor's Wage and Hour Division that found violations of the federal Fair Labor Standards Act's overtime provisions. Additionally, Wal-Mart will pay $463,815 in civil money penalties.


http://www.dol.gov/opa/media/press/whd/WHD20120801.htm#.ULbGQeTAfv4



_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to LookieNoNookie)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: Is Wal Mart Socialist? - 11/29/2012 3:27:57 PM   
Aswad


Posts: 9374
Joined: 4/4/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver

Aswad. You have obviously not read Marx or undertood what he wrote if you have. Over 95% of what he wrote was an analysis of capitalism, which he pretty much hits capitalism on the head.


I understood what he wrote all too well, I fear.

Rather than delving into it here, I alluded to what was buried in his work. If you understand Marx well enough, you can go back there and verify for yourself that I am pointing at a material implication of his work, one he didn't expound much on, but left quite plain to see. Simply put, understanding Marx requires a level of understanding that absolutely permits you to see what I saw. Elucidating it for the benefit of the average reader, however, is going to take a substantial amount of work, on par with the original work, which is something I'm not about to sink into a forum post. Instead, I'm just pointing it out, and leaving the rest as an exercise for the reader.

If you can't see it, that's fine by me:

I would be ecstatically happy to be wrong here, and sincerely hope I am.

IWYW,
— Aswad.


_____________________________

"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind.
From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way.
We do.
" -- Rorschack, Watchmen.


(in reply to meatcleaver)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: Is Wal Mart Socialist? - 11/30/2012 4:52:43 PM   
graceadieu


Posts: 1518
Joined: 3/20/2008
From: Maryland
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam

I know it seems inflamatory but hang with me folks.

Wal Mart isn't exactly known for paying a so-called 'living wage' but a lot of folks have no other choice so they work there.
As a result, these people frequently end up recieving Taxpayer funded state and federal assistance in the form of nutritional assisitance, Section 8 housing, utilities assistance, Communications subsidies, etc. As shown in another thread, these cost the state of Cali alone $86 Million. If you were to add in federal assistance and extrapolate over the other 49 states, DC and the territories, this number could easily push a Billion dollars of taxpayer money.
Every nickel of this ends up subsidizing Wal Mart's bottom line.

Isn't that how some of you folks define Socialism?

Discussion?


I used to work for another major retailer, and they would send home letters advising us on how to apply for Medicaid if we couldn't afford their insurance plan (which most of the employees didn't even get, because all non-supervisory workers were classed as part-time even if they worked 40 hours).

(in reply to Hillwilliam)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Is Wal Mart Socialist? Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.156