RE: Dear Leader's Pack of Lies on Benghazi

RE: Dear Leader's Pack of Lies on Benghazi (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

thompsonx -> RE: Dear Leader's Pack of Lies on Benghazi (10/28/2012 11:54:56 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY Typlcal of the very statist progressives that I'm talking about. What exactly is it that you are talking about? quote: You can't have a discussion about different views, because you see anyone who doesn't agree with you as either 1) stupid, 2) evil or 3) mentally incompetent. Are you talking about the demopubs or the republicrats? quote: And you want us to compromise with you? As I said, your side's idea of "compromise" is "unconditional surrender". Clearly you have not been watching the congress of "no" quote: Ain't gonna happen. "Conservatives" have compromised themselves into a position where there simply isn't any more room to maneuver without becoming something other than "conservative". What exactly is it that conservatives have compromised on? quote: This is the crux of why I think we are likely heading for a place that no one wishes to go. And just where is that? quote: Your side won't accept anything less than complete domination, and we have no more to give you without giving up the basis of what we believe. As above, what exactly is it that the conservatives have compromised on? quote: Something that can't go on ... won't. Anything specific or is ths all your posts contain?

thompsonx -> RE: Dear Leader's Pack of Lies on Benghazi (10/28/2012 12:16:36 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: servantforuse Maybe Obama should answer your question. Instead of calling the attack what it was, he gave his usual line of BS. I guess he didn't want to admit that his foreign policy over the last 4 years is a total failure. How does the current president's foriegn policy differ from the previous dickwad's foriegn policy? We are still in the sand box and we are still in gitmo...or is it just because this one is black and the other one was white?

servantforuse -> RE: Dear Leader's Pack of Lies on Benghazi (10/28/2012 1:45:09 PM)
Do you ever get tired of playing the 'race' card ?

thompsonx -> RE: Dear Leader's Pack of Lies on Benghazi (10/28/2012 2:03:57 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: servantforuse Do you ever get tired of playing the 'race' card ? Do you?

Owner59 -> RE: Dear Leader's Pack of Lies on Benghazi (10/28/2012 2:31:43 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: servantforuse Do you ever get tired of playing the 'race' card ? We`re still waiting to hear what the lies are..... Got a whole thread and lots of space to write.... What`s stopping you.....cowardice?

FMRFGOPGAL -> RE: Dear Leader's Pack of Lies on Benghazi (10/28/2012 2:42:54 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: 6969 If Obama had done everything exactly as he has but instead of being a left-wing "Progressive" Democrat, he was a Conservative Republican you'd be screaming for his impeachment, you and I both know it. It's the way of you communist influenced "progressives" who have hijacked the once great Democrat Party. As for the reelection of this catastrophic mistake you call Obama, it'll be fun talking to you and your ilk on November 7th! When you were still pooping your diapers (or maybe before) remember the last left-wing America hating "progressive" mistake called Jimmy Carter, he was leading by 8% 10 days before the election, and we all know how that worked out!! Reagan 409 EC votes Carter 49 EC votes! Get used to hearing it: Mitt Romney, President of The United States! It's 10 days away! Wow three posts and you know Hill... NOT Get used to hearing this... "Dream On" Unless Mitt's got a plan to open a theme park next to his money.... DOWN IN THE GRAND CAYMANS[:D][:D][:D]

Hillwilliam -> RE: Dear Leader's Pack of Lies on Benghazi (10/28/2012 2:49:28 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: 6969 If Obama had done everything exactly as he has but instead of being a left-wing "Progressive" Democrat, he was a Conservative Republican you'd be screaming for his impeachment, you and I both know it. It's the way of you communist influenced "progressives" who have hijacked the once great Democrat Party. As for the reelection of this catastrophic mistake you call Obama, it'll be fun talking to you and your ilk on November 7th! When you were still pooping your diapers (or maybe before) remember the last left-wing America hating "progressive" mistake called Jimmy Carter, he was leading by 8% 10 days before the election, and we all know how that worked out!! Reagan 409 EC votes Carter 49 EC votes! Get used to hearing it: Mitt Romney, President of The United States! It's 10 days away! The last time we had a conservative running for POTUS, his name was Goldwater. For the past 30+ years, those with an (R) after their name were Corporatist Bible Beaters. Once again, do you have anything to back up your original post Mr Sock puppet or can we assime it's just more asswipe supplied by your local Kool-Aid Delivery Service.

FMRFGOPGAL -> RE: Dear Leader's Pack of Lies on Benghazi (10/28/2012 2:54:01 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY I wipe with the blaze. It's unjounalism and generally isn't paid much heed by intelligent people with a political consciousness. Perhaps you can find the article in a real news site. In other words, it has a point of view and inconvient facts that challenge your beliefs. Therefore, denigrate the source, and not the facts or the logic. I'm sorry if you can't accept that an overgrown blog is just that. Listen, there are a ton of fairly credible conservative news venues, the blaze just isn't one of them. If you are going into the sand-box, please find an equally immature partner. I won't be labeled by someone I am showing the courtesy of not placing a well-deserved one on.

thompsonx -> RE: Dear Leader's Pack of Lies on Benghazi (10/28/2012 2:56:38 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: 6969 If Obama had done everything exactly as he has but instead of being a left-wing "Progressive" Democrat, he was a Conservative Republican you'd be screaming for his impeachment, you and I both know it. opinions are a lot like assholes. Most everyone has one and most everyone figgures theirs works best for them. No one is interested in yours so please stop asking us to do so. quote: It's the way of you communist influenced "progressives" who have hijacked the once great Democrat Party. Perhaps if you knew what the progressive party was about your post would not seem so ill informed. quote: remember the last left-wing America hating "progressive" mistake called Jimmy Carter, Perhaps you might be a bit more specific...what exactly do you feel makes carter an america hater?

Yachtie -> RE: Dear Leader's Pack of Lies on Benghazi (10/28/2012 3:16:28 PM)
fr The information I heard today was that General Ham as head of Africom received the same e-mails the White House received requesting help/support as the attack was taking place. General Ham immediately had a rapid response unit ready and communicated to the Pentagon that he had a unit ready. General Ham then received the order to stand down. His response was to screw it, he was going to help anyhow. Within 30 seconds to a minute after making the move to respond, his second in command apprehended General Ham and told him that he was now relieved of his command. [8\|] edit: The Navy said Saturday it is replacing the admiral in command of an aircraft carrier strike group in the Middle East, pending the outcome of an internal investigation into undisclosed allegations of inappropriate judgment. Rear Adm. Charles M. Gaouette is being sent back to the USS John C. Stennis' home port at Bremerton, Wash., in what the Navy called a temporary reassignment. The Navy said he is not formally relieved of his command of the Stennis strike group but will be replaced by Rear Adm. Troy M. Shoemaker, who will assume command until the investigation is completed. It is highly unusual for the Navy to replace a carrier strike group commander during its deployment. Interesting.

FMRFGOPGAL -> RE: Dear Leader's Pack of Lies on Benghazi (10/28/2012 3:43:36 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Yachtie It is highly unusual for the Navy to replace a carrier strike group commander during its deployment. Interesting. These are unusual times. We have a societal segment of flag wavers that at the first opportunity to use our armed forces to attack the president they hate, quickly discard that flag in the first pile of shit they encounter in their rush to judgement.

Aylee -> RE: Dear Leader's Pack of Lies on Benghazi (10/28/2012 3:54:18 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Yachtie fr The information I heard today was that General Ham as head of Africom received the same e-mails the White House received requesting help/support as the attack was taking place. General Ham immediately had a rapid response unit ready and communicated to the Pentagon that he had a unit ready. General Ham then received the order to stand down. His response was to screw it, he was going to help anyhow. Within 30 seconds to a minute after making the move to respond, his second in command apprehended General Ham and told him that he was now relieved of his command. [8\|] edit: The Navy said Saturday it is replacing the admiral in command of an aircraft carrier strike group in the Middle East, pending the outcome of an internal investigation into undisclosed allegations of inappropriate judgment. Rear Adm. Charles M. Gaouette is being sent back to the USS John C. Stennis' home port at Bremerton, Wash., in what the Navy called a temporary reassignment. The Navy said he is not formally relieved of his command of the Stennis strike group but will be replaced by Rear Adm. Troy M. Shoemaker, who will assume command until the investigation is completed. It is highly unusual for the Navy to replace a carrier strike group commander during its deployment. Interesting. I am curious to know why there was not a helicopter carrier off of the coast. I am curious to know why three requests for help were ignored. Why is the POTUS canceling trips over Sandy but not Benghazi? What happened to letting the public know what happened as soon as they knew? There was a live feed. What would be nice is if there were people that were paid to ask these kinds of questions and then could get the answers out to the public. Someone should design that kind of a job.

Owner59 -> RE: Dear Leader's Pack of Lies on Benghazi (10/28/2012 4:11:39 PM)
I`d like to know why people who don`t know WTF they are talking about, are making so many conclusions......? We all know that it`s political...... No believes it`s about concern for Americans..... When are you cons going to explain why you refused hundreds of millions of dollars for embassy security? That`s not speculative questioning.......that`s on the record.....as fact. We know you cons denied the funds..... Now explain.....

Yachtie -> RE: Dear Leader's Pack of Lies on Benghazi (10/29/2012 5:32:07 AM)
fr This is EXTREMELY significant. Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer – perhaps best known for his work on Able Danger and his subsequent battle with the Defense Intelligence Agency – told Fox News that his sources told him Barack Obama was in the situation room and watched the events in Benghazi unfold in real time.

DomYngBlk -> RE: Dear Leader's Pack of Lies on Benghazi (10/29/2012 5:35:48 AM)
Who is his "source", Glen Beck?

Lucylastic -> RE: Dear Leader's Pack of Lies on Benghazi (10/29/2012 5:40:03 AM)
a facebook claim!!!

Toysinbabeland -> RE: Dear Leader's Pack of Lies on Benghazi (10/29/2012 6:07:04 AM)
Lucy....how do you know its a face book claim? Were you there?

Lucylastic -> RE: Dear Leader's Pack of Lies on Benghazi (10/29/2012 6:10:02 AM)
You missed the "famous email regarding who was behind the attack?" http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=4279717

Toysinbabeland -> RE: Dear Leader's Pack of Lies on Benghazi (10/29/2012 6:12:47 AM)
no actually I'm asking whether or not you were there personally, because I can't imagine that you were there.

Lucylastic -> RE: Dear Leader's Pack of Lies on Benghazi (10/29/2012 6:13:42 AM)
Yep Im hillary clinton Puhleeze

Page: << < prev 1 2 3 [4] 5 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

3.100586E-02