RE: The Numbers Are In For Mittens...

Collarspace Discussion Forums

Home Login Search

RE: The Numbers Are In For Mittens...

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: The Numbers Are In For Mittens...

Page: << < prev 1 2 [3]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: The Numbers Are In For Mittens... - 9/4/2012 3:30:11 PM

VideoAdminChi

Posts: 3086
Joined: 8/6/2012
Status: offline

FR,

A number of posts have been removed from the thread for personal attacks and replying to posts that required removal. Please stay on topic and do not make other posters the topic.

Additionally, I strongly encourage those of you who have had a large number of posts removed to read your email in the very near future.

(in reply to Restyles)

Profile

Post #: 41

RE: The Numbers Are In For Mittens... - 9/4/2012 3:40:42 PM

tazzygirl

Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Restyles

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

quote:

ORIGINAL: Restyles

Depends on the poll you pick. Rasmussen has a 5-6 point "bounce" with something like half the increase coming out of "prefer some other candidate tha O or R", meaning those arent as likely to be lost back as it would be if it came from undecideds.

I use RCP.... it gets rid of the bias from pollers like Rasmussen, which has only ever shown Romney in the lead...

RCP includes ancient numbers, there is no bias in Rasmussen's numbers and you are totally wrong about only showing Romney in the lead. they had Obama in the lead as recently as the day before the convention.

Lets try this again.

You assumed I only meant Rasmussen. It goes on both sides. The averages offered by RCP is more indicative that just one poll.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to Restyles)

Profile

Post #: 42

RE: The Numbers Are In For Mittens... - 9/4/2012 5:30:43 PM

Hillwilliam

Posts: 19394
Joined: 8/27/2008
Status: offline

Comes in, sees post responding to an attack missing. Tips hat to Chi and notes I didnt even bother to or have to report it.

Y'all have a good evening I'm working on sleep deprivitation so I'm outa here.

< Message edited by Hillwilliam -- 9/4/2012 5:31:33 PM >

_____________________________

Kinkier than a cheap garden hose.

Whoever said "Religion is the opiate of the masses" never heard Right Wing talk radio.

Don't blame me, I voted for Gary Johnson.

(in reply to tazzygirl)

Profile

Post #: 43

RE: The Numbers Are In For Mittens... - 9/4/2012 5:33:31 PM

Musicmystery

Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline

quote:

there is no bias in Rasmussen's numbers

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=If9EWDB_zK4

(in reply to Restyles)

Profile

Post #: 44

RE: The Numbers Are In For Mittens... - 9/4/2012 6:42:51 PM

VideoAdminGamma

Posts: 2233
Status: offline

Fast reply

The topic is not each other, your posting history or anything else not included in the OP and slight thread drift. If people enjoy posting unhindered then I suggest stop the off topic hijacks.

Thank you for being a part of CollarMe,
VideoAdminGamma

_____________________________

"The administration has the authority to handle situations in whatever manner they feel to be in the best interests of the forum, at that moment, in response to that event. "

http://www.collarchat.com/m_72/tm.htm

(in reply to Musicmystery)

Profile

Post #: 45

RE: The Numbers Are In For Mittens... - 9/4/2012 7:40:43 PM

Musicmystery

Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline

????

There clearly is bias on Rasmussen's numbers. They called two elections after the fact in the midst of Republican majorities, and they've been slipping ever since.

The Penn and Teller video clip shows first hand the process of a Republican pollster.

< Message edited by Musicmystery -- 9/4/2012 7:41:49 PM >

(in reply to VideoAdminGamma)

Profile

Post #: 46