RE: Mitt Now Officially A Birther

RE: Mitt Now Officially A Birther (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

SilverMark -> RE: Mitt Now Officially A Birther (7/18/2012 1:37:09 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr quote: ORIGINAL: Owner59 One of his top surrogates said the American comment......that makes it Romney`s comment. Using this logic, Rev. (and I use that term loosely) Wright was or wasn't speaking for President Ofailya when he asked for God to damn America? Peace and comfort, Michael Hmmmm, had no idea that a Minister could be a political surrogate....oh wait, does that make all Conservatives responsible for Pat Robertson?......

Owner59 -> RE: Mitt Now Officially A Birther (7/18/2012 2:31:22 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr quote: ORIGINAL: Owner59 One of his top surrogates said the American comment......that makes it Romney`s comment. Using this logic, Rev. (and I use that term loosely) Wright was or wasn't speaking for President Ofailya when he asked for God to damn America? Peace and comfort, Michael Wright was referring to and damming what America.......officially through law and privately,through bigots, has done to the African American community. Everything from nazi-like fiendish medical experaments.... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuskegee_syphilis_experiment .... to jim crow to trying to steal their votes..... today..... So using your logic,sparky.......you`re saying god bless America, for all those awfully things...... Well played, my man......well played.....[8\|]

mnottertail -> RE: Mitt Now Officially A Birther (7/18/2012 2:45:50 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr quote: ORIGINAL: Owner59 One of his top surrogates said the American comment......that makes it Romney`s comment. Using this logic, Rev. (and I use that term loosely) Wright was or wasn't speaking for President Ofailya when he asked for God to damn America? Peace and comfort, Michael You are correct, you are using the term logic loosely, since your post is not only devoid of same, but a damnation in toto of Willard the magic underwear man. Jeremiah Wright was not speaking on behalf of or associated in any way the Obama campaign. Nevertheless, Obama repudiated him publicly and thouroughly. It was on the news and in print. Sunnunu is closesly associated withWillard of the magic underwear and the fucking coward did not repudiate him. He is one more of the typical teabagging, neo-con cowards we always have to have destroying america.

Fellow -> RE: Mitt Now Officially A Birther (7/18/2012 3:13:07 PM)
I think Romney comment was a response to Obama recent spontaneous presentation where he said nobody makes it in his own in America, you need the government. It is fundamentally un-American where individualism is a backbone of the social philosophy. Obama rant was stupid, politically speaking. He showed immaturity despite nearly 4 years in office. The elites may actually toss him out.

vincentML -> RE: Mitt Now Officially A Birther (7/18/2012 3:14:41 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thishereboi Odd, I couldn't find any reference to Obama's birth place being mentioned. So either you have no clue what a "birther" is or you are at a lost for any real news to post and can't stand the thought of being silent. But that's ok. I understand. All that hate has to go somewhere. It doesn't matter that his birthplace is mentioned or not. He is not one of us, yanno, that dark-skinned interloper in the WHITE House.

vincentML -> RE: Mitt Now Officially A Birther (7/18/2012 3:15:53 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Fellow I think Romney comment was a response to Obama recent spontaneous presentation where he said nobody makes it in his own in America, you need the government. It is fundamentally un-American where individualism is a backbone of the social philosophy. Obama rant was stupid, politically speaking. He showed immaturity despite nearly 4 years in office. The elites may actually toss him out. Obama didn't say you need the government. Read the whole quote.

vincentML -> RE: Mitt Now Officially A Birther (7/18/2012 3:19:17 PM)
quote: Sunnunu is closesly associated withWillard of the magic underwear and the fucking coward did not repudiate him. some commentator described Sununu as everyone's worst crazy uncle. It was also offered that John came to America from Cuba and that his family has Islamic descent. I'll check that out but it seemed like a good rumour to pass on unchecked [:D] Nope, not quite. "Sununu was born in Havana, Cuba, the son of Victoria (née Dada) and John Saleh Sununu, an international film distributor.[1] He is of Palestinian and Greek descent [2]. His father grew up in Jerusalem and his mother was born in San Salvador, El Salvador.[2][3] He is a Maronite Catholic." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_H._Sununu Not exactly 'one of us.' Which of course raises the issue: who is us?

NefertariReborn -> RE: Mitt Now Officially A Birther (7/18/2012 3:26:55 PM)
Good god do they teach critical thinking skills in your schools???????? I am constantly amazed at how any fodder gets swallowed then regurgitated. The commentator, a first generation American whose parents came from the Congo, and she acknowledged this point, gave easily easily verifiable facts. My ten year nephew could find this information. She's a brilliant well spoken woman by the way. I expect to see a lot more of her on MSNBC. Sununu was born in Havana, Cuba, the son of Victoria (née Dada) and John Saleh Sununu, an international film distributor.[1] He is of Palestinian and Greek descent [2]. His father grew up in Jerusalem and his mother was born in San Salvador, El Salvador.[ If he was BORN somewhere else he had to COME to America. Born - Come ( Easy concepts.) He is a Catholic doesn't mean he doesn't come from Islamic descent. Much like the Right's Obama argument - His father was Muslim, Obama is Christian therefore he's muslim - what? Socrates flipped on that one. Does that then make Sununu Islamic?

vincentML -> RE: Mitt Now Officially A Birther (7/18/2012 3:31:46 PM)
Oh gee, I made the correction before you finished your rant. sorry about that.[8\|]

NefertariReborn -> RE: Mitt Now Officially A Birther (7/18/2012 3:33:21 PM)
no I had some more for you....you were just a little ahead..I don't mind.

thompsonx -> RE: Mitt Now Officially A Birther (7/18/2012 3:34:27 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Fellow I think Romney comment was a response to Obama recent spontaneous presentation where he said nobody makes it in his own in America, you need the government. Do you just open your mouth to change feet. For fucks sake go look up what was said before you polute this board with your insipid nonsense. quote: It is fundamentally un-American where individualism is a backbone of the social philosophy. Do you have any sort of validation for this moronic tripe? quote: Obama rant was stupid, politically speaking. He showed immaturity despite nearly 4 years in office. The elites may actually toss him out. Perhaps if you had actually read what he said in total your post would not overflow with dumb ass.

Fellow -> RE: Mitt Now Officially A Birther (7/18/2012 4:18:33 PM)
quote: Perhaps if you had actually read what he said in total your post would not overflow with dumb ass. Here is the uncut piece I was referring to: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=192oEC5TX_Q It is a matter what you want to see: Obama-bots, see one thing, independents see something else. quote: quote: It is fundamentally un-American where individualism is a backbone of the social philosophy. Do you have any sort of validation for this moronic tripe? There is nothing mormonic in it. It is very common world-wide accepted observation. Rugged individualism, have you ever heard the phrase?

thompsonx -> RE: Mitt Now Officially A Birther (7/18/2012 4:25:33 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Fellow quote: Perhaps if you had actually read what he said in total your post would not overflow with dumb ass. Here is the uncut piece I was referring to: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=192oEC5TX_Q It is a matter what you want to see: Obama-bots, see one thing, independents see something else. quote: quote: Perhaps if you were to read the whole speech you would not appear so ignorant as to be decieved by a chopped up vidio. It is fundamentally un-American where individualism is a backbone of the social philosophy. Do you have any sort of validation for this moronic tripe? There is nothing mormonic in it. It is very common world-wide accepted observation. Rugged individualism, have you ever heard the phrase? I hear that moronic pharse all the time from ignorant fools who have no clue what they are talking about. I asked you to post some reputable cite to validate your moroic, sophmoric , ignorant post. So far you have been unable to do something as simple as that. We are all waiting for you to show us how the bill gates, ted turners, goldman sachs etc were rugged individualist. A quick check of the record will show these cocksuckers have their lips wrapped prehensilly around the govt tit.

Fellow -> RE: Mitt Now Officially A Birther (7/18/2012 6:25:26 PM)
quote: We are all waiting for you to show us how the bill gates, ted turners, goldman sachs etc were rugged individualist. A quick check of the record will show these cocksuckers have their lips wrapped prehensilly around the govt tit. They certainly were. Bill Gates started small, the government did not have anything to do with it. So did ted Turner taking over his father's business at age 24. Goldman Sachs was established 1869, the government gave out nothing then. Bill Gates actually tried to stay away from the government as much as possible. After Bill Clinton was bought by Sun and Oracle and went after him with the Department of Justice he started giving out acceptable bribes. The symbiosis between the government and big business is two way street, the businesses do not exist because of the government. Today the government gives them competitive advantage and the bureaucracy acts as a parasite. The population does not actually benefit of it in a bigger perspective. Personal power and strong individual ideal has been American ideology. You see it clearly in arts and movies (superheroes, John Wayne, Rambo and so on). Arts are the reflection of the society to a great extent. It is not related to parties per se. The Democrats follow the same ideology. Their selling point is rather to offer something to people who do not succeed (social protection by state, welfare and such). Obama has clearly different mindset, and this is what esp. constitutionalists and libertarians are worried about. Romney himself is not really old-fashioned Republican, rather a new breed corporatist. He is perfectly fine with corporate police state build-up.

SilverMark -> RE: Mitt Now Officially A Birther (7/18/2012 6:41:43 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Fellow I think Romney comment was a response to Obama recent spontaneous presentation where he said nobody makes it in his own in America, you need the government. It is fundamentally un-American where individualism is a backbone of the social philosophy. Obama rant was stupid, politically speaking. He showed immaturity despite nearly 4 years in office. The elites may actually toss him out. Not what he said at all.... ""If you were successful, somebody along the line gave you some help," Obama said. "There was a great teacher somewhere in your life. Somebody helped to create this unbelievable American system that we have that allowed you to thrive. Somebody invested in roads and bridges. If you’ve got a business, you didn’t build that. Somebody else made that happen." "The point is, is that when we succeed, we succeed because of our individual initiative, but also because we do things together," Obama said." For clarity... The antecedent to "that" is not the business, but "roads and bridges," as well as the "American system" as a whole.

thompsonx -> RE: Mitt Now Officially A Birther (7/18/2012 6:53:14 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Fellow quote: We are all waiting for you to show us how the bill gates, ted turners, goldman sachs etc were rugged individualist. A quick check of the record will show these cocksuckers have their lips wrapped prehensilly around the govt tit. quote: They certainly were. Bill Gates started small, the government did not have anything to do with it. So did ted Turner taking over his father's business at age 24. Why don't you tell us about teds daddy. quote: Goldman Sachs was established 1869, the government gave out nothing then. You might not have heard but the govt subsidized the transcontinental rail road...you may not have heard of leland stanford and mark hopkins and charlie crocker and their pals google could be your friend here. You might look at companies like swift who got his start profiteering on the civil war...puleeeeze "the govt gave out nothing then" quote: Bill Gates actually tried to stay away from the government as much as possible. After Bill Clinton was bought by Sun and Oracle and went after him with the Department of Justice he started giving out acceptable bribes. So you feel that poor bill should have been allowed to continue his illegal behaviour? You know he ones he was found guilty of in a court of law. You know the one where the fine was some fracton of a single digit percentage of the money he acquired illegally. quote: The symbiosis between the government and big business is two way street, the businesses do not exist because of the government. Today the government gives them competitive advantage and the bureaucracy acts as a parasite. The population does not actually benefit of it in a bigger perspective. Yu have an uncanny grasp of the obvious quote]Personal power and strong individual ideal has been American ideology. You see it clearly in arts and movies (superheroes, John Wayne, Rambo and so on). Arts are the reflection of the society to a great extent. Are you really trying to tell me that in your general life you meet people like rambo and all of the john wayne characters. Most of the john wayne movies I recall are of some arrogant asshole beating people up because he was bigger and better shot. I see this moronic behavior in the folks who run my country but I have yet to meet anyone who acts like the john wayne characters or rambo in my day to day life. quote: It is not related to parties per se. The Democrats follow the same ideology. Their selling point is rather to offer something to people who do not succeed (social protection by state, welfare and such). So your opinion is that anyone on the govt tit has not succeeded? That would by definition include every corporation in this country. You seem to be having a bit of a problem with getting all of your rotten eggs into one basket. quote: Obama has clearly different mindset, and this is what esp. constitutionalists and libertarians are worried about. How can you equate constitutionalist and libertarians? They are nearly polar oposites. quote: Romney himself is not really old-fashioned Republican, rather a new breed corporatist. He is perfectly fine with corporate police state build-up. How is he different from the current or the past president?

kalikshama -> RE: Mitt Now Officially A Birther (7/18/2012 8:20:03 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr quote: ORIGINAL: Owner59 One of his top surrogates said the American comment......that makes it Romney`s comment. Using this logic, Rev. (and I use that term loosely) Wright was or wasn't speaking for President Ofailya when he asked for God to damn America? Peace and comfort, Michael Psst - "Confusing God and Government" was given 4/13/03. While I do consider G.W. Bush to be a failure as president, I somehow think you meant Ofailya to represent President Obama.

Moonhead -> RE: Mitt Now Officially A Birther (7/19/2012 4:50:28 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: SilverMark quote: ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr quote: ORIGINAL: Owner59 One of his top surrogates said the American comment......that makes it Romney`s comment. Using this logic, Rev. (and I use that term loosely) Wright was or wasn't speaking for President Ofailya when he asked for God to damn America? Peace and comfort, Michael Hmmmm, had no idea that a Minister could be a political surrogate....oh wait, does that make all Conservatives responsible for Pat Robertson?...... The really weird thing about that one is the way the neocon massive switch between blathering about Reveredn Wright and insisting that teh Kenyan's a Mooslim infiltrator who wants to impose Shariah law and cut your daughter's clit off without even changing gears, never mind noticing that there's a slight contradiction there...

thompsonx -> RE: Mitt Now Officially A Birther (7/19/2012 7:17:02 AM)
quote: The really weird thing about that one is the way the neocon massive switch between blathering about Reveredn Wright and insisting that teh Kenyan's a Mooslim infiltrator who wants to impose Shariah law and cut your daughter's clit off without even changing gears, never mind noticing that there's a slight contradiction there... So when you and your peers see this sort of disconect in the thought process of a significant number of the electorate in the u.s. what are your thoughts?

thompsonx -> RE: Mitt Now Officially A Birther (7/19/2012 7:24:24 AM)
quote: quote]Personal power and strong individual ideal has been American ideology. You see it clearly in arts and movies (superheroes, John Wayne, Rambo and so on). Arts are the reflection of the society to a great extent. I remain unconvinced that any connection between rambo/john wayne and the arts is anything but tangental. If we accept that art can and often does reflect the culture of a society then how might you contrast robert maplethorp/jackson pollick and your exampes of rambo/john wayne as manifestations of that reflection?

Page: << < prev 1 [2] 3 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875