RE: Retro ads - why be skinny? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


LadyHibiscus -> RE: Retro ads - why be skinny? (7/8/2012 8:03:08 PM)

Hilly...don't tell me you lack imagination as far as that goes? [;)]




fetisheden -> RE: Retro ads - why be skinny? (7/8/2012 8:21:07 PM)


right. i'm a size 12 for vintage or 4/xs in modern clothes
so marilyn would be a generous size small



quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyHibiscus

Except that Marilyn's size 14 was akin to our size 6-8!





tiggerspoohbear -> RE: Retro ads - why be skinny? (7/8/2012 8:39:07 PM)

All I know is that I was built for comfort not for speed. [;)]




ashjor911 -> RE: Retro ads - why be skinny? (7/8/2012 9:57:39 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tiggerspoohbear

All I know is that I was built for comfort not for speed. [;)]


I did not know what you mean by that... but i sure hope its something naughty [:D][:D]




tiggerspoohbear -> RE: Retro ads - why be skinny? (7/9/2012 6:30:59 AM)

Ooooh, Ash, as far as I'm concerned it's a good thing. [:D]




MalcolmNathaniel -> RE: Retro ads - why be skinny? (7/10/2012 11:25:21 PM)

There was a study done on beauty, and I have never been able to find it on the net. I've been looking for it for fifteen years. It was shown on the Discovery Channel before it became all sharks and dinosaurs (so late 1990's?)

They actually went all over the world and found that pretty much all men, everywhere, even in places where modern imagery was sadly lacking liked the same body form.

The verdict is that it had nothing to do with weight: it was a ratio of hips to waist to breasts.

They did the same thing with ratios between facial features and generated a computer image of the most beautiful face you've ever seen. I seem to recall that this involved the Golden Ratio somehow.

My point is that there is mathematics and genetics play a much larger part than media. What the media shows you is what designers want women to believe is desirable. Men already know.

Ladies: crack open some men's magazines to find out what men want (not just the nudity.) You'll find that, in general, the body style hasn't changed much between the first issue of Playboy and the latest issue of Maxim.

Addendum: It's what men want to look at not necessarily what they want in bed. In the early 1990's in college Kate Moss was the toast of the town in fashion circles. I don't know a single man who found her attractive before she put on some weight.




MercTech -> RE: Retro ads - why be skinny? (7/11/2012 5:03:58 PM)

Popular concepts of beauty change.
i.e. 100 years ago having a tan was a sign of being a poor loser that had to work out in the heat and the sun.

You too can be a sweater girl

http://www.peterpaulrubens.org/Venus,-Cupid,-Baccchus-and-Ceres-1612-13.html

http://www.freakingnews.com/Rubens-Pics-20839.asp

http://archive.org/details/BettyGrable-1940sPin-upGirl

http://archive.org/details/BettiePagepinUpBeautiesFight1950sFetishStagFilm (bet ya didn't know the Smithsonian hosts a web site with stag films... grin)

http://www.flickr.com/photos/smuckatelli/6849257681/

http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/photo/2011-12/07/c_131292854_12.htm

http://www.digitaldeliftp.com/lookaround/advertspot_cocacola7.htm

Then there is the fallout from the current standards of beauty:

http://jezebel.com/236871/a-horrible-symmetry




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125