Issa Admits White House Wasn’t Involved In Fast And Furious ‘Coverup’

Issa Admits White House Wasn’t Involved In Fast And Furious ‘Coverup’ (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

Owner59 -> Issa Admits White House Wasn’t Involved In Fast And Furious ‘Coverup’ (6/24/2012 11:10:20 AM)
The Republican chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee on Sunday said that there was no proof that President Barack Obama’s White House had any involvement in Fast and Furious, a botched gun “walking” program that intended to trace weapon sales to Mexico. Fox News host Chris Wallace on Sunday asked Oversight Committee Chairman Darrel Issa (R-CA) if he had any evidence to support Boehner’s claim. “No, we don’t,” Issa admitted. “And what we are seeking are documents that we know to exist, February 4 to December [2011] that are in fact about [Border Patrol agent] Brian Terry’s murder — who knew, and why people were lying about it.” “No evidence at this point that the White House is involved in a cover up?” Wallace pressed. "And I hope that they don’t get involved,” Issa replied. http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/06/24/issa-admits-no-evidence-white-house-involved-in-fast-and-furious/

outhere69 -> RE: Issa Admits White House Wasn’t Involved In Fast And Furious ‘Coverup’ (6/24/2012 1:29:45 PM)
Mondo furor about 3% of the weapons that went the wrong way.

Yachtie -> RE: Issa Admits White House Wasn’t Involved In Fast And Furious ‘Coverup’ (6/24/2012 2:36:46 PM)
fr Did Issa Admits White House Wasn’t Involved In Fast And Furious ‘Coverup’? Actually, no he didn't. He merely said there is no evidence and that he hopes none is found during the investigation. “No evidence at this point that the White House is involved in a cover up?” Wallace pressed. "And I hope that they don’t get involved,” Issa replied.

mnottertail -> RE: Issa Admits White House Wasn’t Involved In Fast And Furious ‘Coverup’ (6/24/2012 2:51:39 PM)
don't-weren't.......try again popeye, congressmen and senators practice the message before public speaking. they dont fit the mold you're trying to make. And I am interested in how somebody thinks it was covered up, it sure met with some real limited success didn't it then?

MasterSlaveLA -> RE: Issa Admits White House Wasn’t Involved In Fast And Furious ‘Coverup’ (6/24/2012 3:56:13 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Owner59 ...Fast And Furious ‘Coverup’ Glad to see you're ADMITTING a "Coverup" is taking place... admission is the first step. [:D]

Yachtie -> RE: Issa Admits White House Wasn’t Involved In Fast And Furious ‘Coverup’ (6/24/2012 4:47:27 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail And I am interested in how somebody thinks it was covered up, it sure met with some real limited success didn't it then? Two dead border patrol agents. I can see how you might call that limited success, from your warped point of view.

subrob1967 -> RE: Issa Admits White House Wasn’t Involved In Fast And Furious ‘Coverup’ (6/24/2012 5:21:48 PM)
It only took a whistle blowing ATF agent to come forward for Congress to learn of the plan to let guns flow freely into Mexican criminal hands. Is the whistle blower a hero like Brad Manning or Julian Assange, now that the whistle's been blown against the left? That's the question I'd ask you lefties.

tazzygirl -> RE: Issa Admits White House Wasn’t Involved In Fast And Furious ‘Coverup’ (6/24/2012 5:59:22 PM)
I never thought Manning was a hero.

subrob1967 -> RE: Issa Admits White House Wasn’t Involved In Fast And Furious ‘Coverup’ (6/24/2012 6:40:35 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tazzygirl I never thought Manning was a hero. Ok, you're excused for Manning. What about Assange?

Owner59 -> RE: Issa Admits White House Wasn’t Involved In Fast And Furious ‘Coverup’ (6/24/2012 6:52:22 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MasterSlaveLA quote: ORIGINAL: Owner59 ...Fast And Furious ‘Coverup’ Glad to see you're ADMITTING a "Coverup" is taking place... admission is the first step. [:D] Ummm......I was quoting Issa and fuxnews...... pay attention.....

Owner59 -> RE: Issa Admits White House Wasn’t Involved In Fast And Furious ‘Coverup’ (6/24/2012 7:01:37 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Yachtie quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail And I am interested in how somebody thinks it was covered up, it sure met with some real limited success didn't it then? Two dead border patrol agents. I can see how you might call that limited success, from your warped point of view. No one believes you`re concerned with LEO`s killed in the line of duty......what you cons are doing is disgusting tho..... To my recollection.....no republican has mentioned them before......especially on these boards. Now all of a sudden......those poor fallen LEO`s are supper important.......almost as important as the election...... [8\|] [X(] What a bunch of bullshit.......

MasterSlaveLA -> RE: Issa Admits White House Wasn’t Involved In Fast And Furious ‘Coverup’ (6/24/2012 7:17:26 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Owner59 quote: ORIGINAL: MasterSlaveLA quote: ORIGINAL: Owner59 ...Fast And Furious ‘Coverup’ Glad to see you're ADMITTING a "Coverup" is taking place... admission is the first step. [:D] Ummm......I was quoting Issa and fuxnews...... pay attention..... And yet... no quotes around YOUR words?!! Again, thanks for admitting a "Coverup" by the SCUM within the O'Fuckup administration!!! [:D]

Owner59 -> RE: Issa Admits White House Wasn’t Involved In Fast And Furious ‘Coverup’ (6/24/2012 8:45:50 PM)
Ummm....there are quotatation marks.......and there is help too......if you want it.

tazzygirl -> RE: Issa Admits White House Wasn’t Involved In Fast And Furious ‘Coverup’ (6/24/2012 9:16:53 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: subrob1967 quote: ORIGINAL: tazzygirl I never thought Manning was a hero. Ok, you're excused for Manning. What about Assange? Nope... never thought he was either.

tazzygirl -> RE: Issa Admits White House Wasn’t Involved In Fast And Furious ‘Coverup’ (6/24/2012 9:20:05 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Owner59 Ummm....there are quotatation marks.......and there is help too......if you want it. In Fast And Furious ‘Coverup’ In Fast And Furious ‘Coverup’ Maybe that will help her [:D]

DesideriScuri -> RE: Issa Admits White House Wasn’t Involved In Fast And Furious ‘Coverup’ (6/25/2012 12:08:40 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail don't-weren't.......try again popeye, congressmen and senators practice the message before public speaking. they dont fit the mold you're trying to make. And I am interested in how somebody thinks it was covered up, it sure met with some real limited success didn't it then? I think Yachtie missed a little bit that will help settle this. quote: Fox News host Chris Wallace on Sunday asked ... Darrel Issa (R-CA) if he had any evidence to support Boehner’s claim. “No, we don’t,” Issa admitted. “And what we are seeking are documents that we know to exist, February 4 to December [2011] that are in fact about [Border Patrol agent] Brian Terry’s murder — who knew, and why people were lying about it.” “No evidence at this point that the White House is involved in a cover up?” Wallace pressed. "And I hope that they don’t get involved,” Issa replied. So, "no evidence at this point" means that they have no evidence of the White House being involved in a cover up, but also that they are not done with their investigation, so there could still be evidence out there.

Owner59 -> RE: Issa Admits White House Wasn’t Involved In Fast And Furious ‘Coverup’ (6/25/2012 8:43:06 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Yachtie fr Did Issa Admits White House Wasn’t Involved In Fast And Furious ‘Coverup’? Actually, no he didn't. He merely said there is no evidence and that he hopes none is found during the investigation. “No evidence at this point that the White House is involved in a cover up?” Wallace pressed. "And I hope that they don’t get involved,” Issa replied. Anyone with an once of perception would knows that "And".....acknowledges the sentence before. For example, if I called Issa a complete jackass to his face and he asked me if I was talking about him and my reply was "And so are your pathetic followers"...... That,would be an acknowledgment that Yes, in deed I was talking about him when I called him a jackass to his face. Capiche?

DesideriScuri -> RE: Issa Admits White House Wasn’t Involved In Fast And Furious ‘Coverup’ (6/26/2012 5:25:45 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Owner59 quote: ORIGINAL: Yachtie fr Did Issa Admits White House Wasn’t Involved In Fast And Furious ‘Coverup’? Actually, no he didn't. He merely said there is no evidence and that he hopes none is found during the investigation. “No evidence at this point that the White House is involved in a cover up?” Wallace pressed. "And I hope that they don’t get involved,” Issa replied. Anyone with an once of perception would knows that "And".....acknowledges the sentence before. For example, if I called Issa a complete jackass to his face and he asked me if I was talking about him and my reply was "And so are your pathetic followers"...... That,would be an acknowledgment that Yes, in deed I was talking about him when I called him a jackass to his face. Capiche? Yep, you're right. He said they have no evidence yet, and he hopes that they don't find any. Still doesn't mean they won't find any.

mnottertail -> RE: Issa Admits White House Wasn’t Involved In Fast And Furious ‘Coverup’ (6/26/2012 6:05:47 AM)
And it don't mean they will, if they aint found it in over 7000 documents, and all the hearings, I don't think Issa will come up with any more than he did in the Islamic witch hunt.

Musicmystery -> RE: Issa Admits White House Wasn’t Involved In Fast And Furious ‘Coverup’ (6/26/2012 6:11:24 AM)
quote: Anyone with an once of perception I have better than an ounce of perception. And they are right--your title and OP stretches the statement beyond what is said or meant, to the point of misrepresentation. In short, it's not true. Nor is the reverse true--but they are right to call you on this.

Page: [1] 2 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

3.515625E-02