Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Lanny Davis: “You Have Vicious People Who Are Working For The President”


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Lanny Davis: “You Have Vicious People Who Are Working For The President” Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Lanny Davis: “You Have Vicious People Who Are Wor... - 6/10/2012 1:33:47 PM   
kalikshama


Posts: 14805
Joined: 8/8/2010
Status: offline
http://news.yahoo.com/obama-girl-not-excited-2012-won-t-endorse-193610215.html

I'm not as excited about Obama as I was in 2008 (although his war on terrorism has exceeded my expectations.) At the beginning of the Republican primaries I was thinking that Romney would be a preferable alternative if he would be able to get Congress to cooperate. However, after listening to and learning about Romney, I'll be voting for Obama again.

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Lanny Davis: “You Have Vicious People Who Are Wor... - 6/10/2012 1:38:08 PM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

Commence with the mad flailing about:



quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead
Well remind me, then: which Democrat senators were employing publicists who were calling for their female colleagues on the other party to have acid flung in their faces? When did Joe Leiberman start putting gunsightssurveyor's marks all over his website, then yank that graphic when somebody on his list actually got shot through the head? Which Democrats were complaining that the Chimp couldn't possibly the President because he was a Kenyan (rather than because he was appointed by the supreme court rather than the electorate)?





< Message edited by Sanity -- 6/10/2012 1:39:18 PM >


_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to Moonhead)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: Lanny Davis: “You Have Vicious People Who Are Wor... - 6/10/2012 1:40:42 PM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline


...And the persecution of the war on terrorism was highest on your list, back in 2008?

quote:

ORIGINAL: kalikshama

http://news.yahoo.com/obama-girl-not-excited-2012-won-t-endorse-193610215.html

I'm not as excited about Obama as I was in 2008 (although his war on terrorism has exceeded my expectations.) At the beginning of the Republican primaries I was thinking that Romney would be a preferable alternative if he would be able to get Congress to cooperate. However, after listening to and learning about Romney, I'll be voting for Obama again.





_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to kalikshama)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: Lanny Davis: “You Have Vicious People Who Are Wor... - 6/10/2012 1:42:32 PM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


Commence with the mad flailing about:



quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead
Well remind me, then: which Democrat senators were employing publicists who were calling for their female colleagues on the other party to have acid flung in their faces? When did Joe Leiberman start putting gunsightssurveyor's marks all over his website, then yank that graphic when somebody on his list actually got shot through the head? Which Democrats were complaining that the Chimp couldn't possibly the President because he was a Kenyan (rather than because he was appointed by the supreme court rather than the electorate)?





So I'm wrong about the Republicans lack of class during the kenyan's first term exceeding the Democrat's lack of class during the Chimp's first term then, am I?
Until you can demonstrate that much, I'm not the one flailing here.

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: Lanny Davis: “You Have Vicious People Who Are Wor... - 6/10/2012 1:54:37 PM   
kalikshama


Posts: 14805
Joined: 8/8/2010
Status: offline
Lanny Davis was reacting to this NY Post piece. (Note that the Post tends towards sensationalism.)

Booker's big mouth ruins relationship with Obama, Cabinet hopes

It’s bye-bye, Beltway for Cory Booker.

Newark’s mayor, who was gunning for a spot in President Obama’s Cabinet, lost the chance after he shot his mouth off during a blunderingly honest TV appearance last month, sources told The Post.

“He’s dead to us,” one ranking administration official said of the prevailing feelings at the White House and Obama headquarters in Chicago.

Booker had been angling for the housing secretary gig in a second Obama term, according to sources in the administration and close to the mayor.

The job was certainly a possibility, given Booker’s work in New Jersey’s biggest city, according to administration and Democratic Party sources.

Thinking highly of Booker, Obama’s campaign asked him to appear on “Meet the Press” on May 20 to act as a mouthpiece, but he proceeded to eviscerate one of the president’s key campaign themes.

Booker told a national TV audience the president’s attacks on Mitt Romney’s record at private-equity firm Bain Capital were “nauseating” and made him “very uncomfortable.”

“I have to just say from a very personal level, I’m not about to sit here and indict private equity,” said Booker, a rising Democratic star tapped by the president’s campaign as a “surrogate” speaker for Obama. “If you look at the totality of Bain Capital’s record, they’ve done a lot to support businesses.”

Almost immediately, top Obama aides were speed-dialing Booker, insisting he backpedal from his comments before returning to the Garden State. But the mayor wouldn’t do that.

Booker further enraged them by waiting until that night to post an online video that was neither cleared by the campaign nor acceptable to Obama strategists.

And then Booker did it again. The next night, he went on Rachel Maddow’s MSNBC show to talk about his earlier comments without discussing it with the campaign or working out a cohesive message with Obama’s team. During that appearance, Booker threw even more fuel on the fire when he made it look as if he had been ordered to retract his comments because he decided to “clarify” them after “he did talk with campaign officials.”

“Cory and Barack Obama have never been besties, but that was the final nail. It’s like, ‘You’re dead and done.’ The firing squad is out,” said a Democratic source in contact with both sides. “It’s not just that he messed up, it was that he compounded it and didn’t have their back when they gave him a national stage to talk.”

The Obama camp tried to play down the bad blood with Booker yesterday.

“Mayor Booker’s comments are behind us and we are working together to re-elect the president in November,” said Patrick Gaspard, head of the Democratic National Committee.

Other campaign insiders insist that Booker is not persona non grata, although he is in the doghouse and knows it.

“What he did was undermine a leading argument for the campaign. It was a serious distraction. Not a minor screw-up; a major screw-up,” a Democratic source said. “He is trying to figure out how to work his way back in the fold.”

Last weekend, Booker did a West Coast swing for the Obama campaign and is already scheduled for upcoming appearances.

In Seattle, Booker joked that the campaign had instructed him not to “stick your foot in your mouth again . . .So this is my probation speech.”

Booker’s comments on “Meet the Press” opened the floodgates for other Democrats to get off message.

In recent weeks, Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick said, “I think Bain is a perfectly fine company. They’ve got a role in the private economy and I’ve got a lot of friends there.”

Then former President Bill Clinton said Romney “had a sterling business career,” and endorsed an immediate extension of the Bush tax cuts.

And yesterday, former Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell — who used to head the Democratic National Committee — minimized Obama’s background entering the presidency, saying Hillary Rodham Clinton “would’ve come in with a lot more executive experience . . . I think the president was hurt by being a legislator only.”

For his part, Bill Clinton personally apologized yesterday for going rogue on Obama.

“I’m very sorry about what happened,” the former president told CNN. “I thought something had to be done on the “fiscal cliff’ before the election. Apparently nothing has to be done until the first of the year.”

[email protected]

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: Lanny Davis: “You Have Vicious People Who Are Wor... - 6/10/2012 1:55:57 PM   
kalikshama


Posts: 14805
Joined: 8/8/2010
Status: offline
quote:

And the persecution of the war on terrorism was highest on your list, back in 2008?


No, which is partly why I had low expectations.

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: Lanny Davis: “You Have Vicious People Who Are Wor... - 6/10/2012 2:02:24 PM   
kalikshama


Posts: 14805
Joined: 8/8/2010
Status: offline
quote:

"We’re going to punish our enemies and we’re gonna reward our friends"


Context:

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2010/10/transcript-of-president-barack-obama-with-univision.html

...EPS: Many Hispanics feel disappointed with you because comprehensive immigration reform has not been passed. What can you tell them?

POTUS: Well, I'm disappointed, too. As you heard in the introduction, this is something that I've been committed to for many years. I committed to it when I was a U.S. Senator, I committed to it when I was a state senator. It's something that I deeply believe that we've got to solve our immigration problem so that we're both a nation of immigrants and a nation of laws so that people can come out of the shadows, that people who are productive and otherwise law-abiding are able to get on a pathway to citizenship. They pay a fine, pay back taxes, learn English, become part of this beautiful American community of ours. And the fact that we have not got it done is something that frustrates me and I know that it frustrates many people in the community. But I think it's important for people to understand why it hasn't gotten done. In the United States Senate, over the last two years, many Republicans who used to support Comprehensive Immigration Reform, like John McCain, decided not to support it and in the Senate, you've got a rule that says 50 votes is not enough. That you can't just pass a law with 50 or 51 votes, you have to have a super majority of 60 votes. We have the majority of Democrats supporting us, so I could easily get 50 votes, Democratic votes, but I'd need some help from our Republican friends. And what happened was we still have 11 Republicans in the United States Senate who voted for Comprehensive Immigration Reform four years ago, but now are not willing to step up. And so the problem that we have is, is that until I can get some cooperation from the other side, then people who are anti-immigration reform can continue to block it. And that's why this election coming up is so important because we essentially have to say that those who are politicizing the issue, who are supportive of the Arizona law, who talk only about border security but aren't willing to talk about the other aspects of this, who don't support the Dream Act, who are out there engaging in rhetoric that is divisive and damaging that -- those aren't the kinds of folks who represent our core American values.

EPS: But Mr. President, you were able to pass a healthcare plan and you worked a lot for that. And most of my listeners, they haven't seen that, the same way that you worked for healthcare for immigration reform. The same effort.

POTUS: Well, here's the difference, Piolín. First of all, on immigration reform, I can't get 100 percent of Democrats. I can get 90 percent of Democrats, but I can't get 100 percent. So with healthcare reform, we were just, like, a vote short, just one vote, and so if we've worked so hard, we could finally tip it over the edge. Right now on immigration reform, we're eight votes short or 10 votes short, so we have do the work behind the scenes to build the groundswell of support that can get us then over the finish line. What I don't wanna do is start this thing like we did several years ago and then it just collapses because if you start it and you don't finish it, then people say, well, this can't be done and four years from now, five years from now, we'll still be talking about immigration reform. What we're trying to do is to build a consensus in the country that says, this is the right thing to do, that we've got some bipartisan support. I've met with the Congressional Hispanic Caucus many times, I've met with immigration rights groups many times. I have not backed off of this issue. Just a few months ago, I gave a speech outlining very clearly my support for comprehensive immigration reform. My cabinet has been working very hard on trying to get it done, but ultimately, I think somebody said the other day, I am president, I am not king. I can't do these things just by myself. We have a system of government that requires the Congress to work with the Executive Branch to make it happen. I'm committed to making it happen, but I've gotta have some partners to do it.

EPS: Yes. And that's why last year, I put together a group of well-respected leaders to help you, but I never heard back from your office.

POTUS: Ah, but Piolín, look, the truth of the matter is -- here's the question that I think all your listeners have to ask themselves. If the vast majority of Democrats support this issue, if I as the President support this issue, if we've been willing to speak out on this issue forcefully and we have the other party, which not only is not supporting it, but actually doing things that are damaging to the Latino community, then the question I have is why are we spending time talking about us instead of spending time focusing on getting Republicans to do what is right? Because I'm not asking for 100 percent support from Republicans, I'm not asking even for 50 percent support from Republicans. I just want a little bit of support so that I can actually get this thing passed. Now, the fact of the matter is, is that we have worked this issue hard; we will continue to work this hard. I'm only in the first two years of my presidency and, by the way, I had a huge economic crisis. The issues like healthcare reform that we worked on are hugely important to the Latino community. By far, Hispanics are the most likely to work and not have health insurance. The issues of the economy hugely affect the Hispanic community. A lot of them were in construction and when the housing market collapsed, that meant a lot of people were laid off. So it's not as if the issues that we're working on are issues that aren't important to the Latino community. They're very important. Immigration reform is one of those issues we're gonna get it done, but I'm gonna continue to need some help from the other side.

EPS: When is it going to happen? You will tell me after this.

[COMMERCIAL BREAK]

POTUS: Well, here's what we're gonna do. We're gonna see how well we do in this election and I think a lot of it is gonna depend on whether we still have some support not only from Democrats, but also Republicans, but they're gonna be paying attention to this election. And if Latinos sit out the election instead of saying, we're gonna punish our enemies and we're gonna reward our friends who stand with us on issues that are important to us, if they don't see that kind of upsurge in voting in this election, then I think it's gonna be harder and that's why I think it's so important that people focus on voting on November 2.

(in reply to MasterSlaveLA)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: Lanny Davis: “You Have Vicious People Who Are Wor... - 6/10/2012 7:20:32 PM   
TheHeretic


Posts: 19100
Joined: 3/25/2007
From: California, USA
Status: offline
Thanks for the link, Firm. Guessing from the course of the thread, not many seem to have given it a listen.
Message discipline is a vital thing for the campaign, but having to be seen whipping the minions back into line could hurt them worse.

But then, a central message of the campaign is hitting a powerfully negative resonance with their own base. That's a problem they might do better to look at.

< Message edited by TheHeretic -- 6/10/2012 7:22:57 PM >

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: Lanny Davis: “You Have Vicious People Who Are Wor... - 6/10/2012 8:10:13 PM   
fucktoyprincess


Posts: 2337
Status: offline
FR

Maybe I'm not following this properly, but since when is anyone, including a sitting President, required to work with anyone in particular? I think you put on your team the people who you think can most effectively further the policy goals that you have. Prominent Democrats do not have to fall in line. But by the same token, they also should not be shocked to not be invited to an inner position.

This all seems like much ado about nothing to me.....

_____________________________

~ ftp

(in reply to TheHeretic)
Profile   Post #: 29
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Lanny Davis: “You Have Vicious People Who Are Working For The President” Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094