Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: The Environmental Crucifixion Agency


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: The Environmental Crucifixion Agency Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: The Environmental Crucifixion Agency - 5/3/2012 8:53:01 AM   
Hillwilliam


Posts: 19394
Joined: 8/27/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: papassion


It sure is comforting to know that when you starve to death because you have no work, that your last breath will be fresh air! Of course we want clean air and clean water but it has to be practical. Enviromentalists don't want neuclear, windmills or coal, and balk at anything that might endanger some insect or animal. What they want is something that is not yet invented. That is not a practical solution

You having fun just making shit up?

He didn't make it up, that requires intelligence and creativity. 10 to 1, he either got mass emailed by some rightie or he scammed it off face book.

_____________________________

Kinkier than a cheap garden hose.

Whoever said "Religion is the opiate of the masses" never heard Right Wing talk radio.

Don't blame me, I voted for Gary Johnson.

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 61
RE: The Environmental Crucifixion Agency - 5/3/2012 8:59:39 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

It was my understanding that a lot of American environmentalists were pro nuclear. Not the Sierra Club or the monkeywrenchers, but those with a bit more of a clue about engineering.



Pro nuclear environmentalist????????
Isn't that a contradiction of terms?

(in reply to Moonhead)
Profile   Post #: 62
RE: The Environmental Crucifixion Agency - 5/3/2012 9:01:01 AM   
Iamsemisweet


Posts: 3651
Joined: 4/9/2011
From: The Great Northwest, USA
Status: offline 		Not at all.
quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead




Pro nuclear environmentalist????????
Isn't that a contradiction of terms?



_____________________________

Alice: But I don't want to go among mad people.
The Cat: Oh, you can't help that. We're all mad here. I'm mad. You're mad.
Alice: How do you know I'm mad?
The Cat: You must be. Or you wouldn't have come here.

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 63
RE: The Environmental Crucifixion Agency - 5/3/2012 9:07:10 AM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

It was my understanding that a lot of American environmentalists were pro nuclear. Not the Sierra Club or the monkeywrenchers, but those with a bit more of a clue about engineering.



Pro nuclear environmentalist????????
Isn't that a contradiction of terms?

Nope.
Nuclear power plants put out a lot less pollutants than the ones that burn fossil fuels and don't contribute to global warmingAl Gore's unAmerican conspiracy theory at all.

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 64
RE: The Environmental Crucifixion Agency - 5/3/2012 9:36:57 AM   
Mupainurpleasure


Posts: 393
Joined: 4/12/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

It was my understanding that a lot of American environmentalists were pro nuclear. Not the Sierra Club or the monkeywrenchers, but those with a bit more of a clue about engineering.

obama pro nunclear as are many liberals because global warming is real and it is clean its just you dont build them where hurricanes hit or earthquakes or in the middle of huge cities. we do need ot stop kicking storage of spent fuel forward thoguh

(in reply to Moonhead)
Profile   Post #: 65
RE: The Environmental Crucifixion Agency - 5/3/2012 10:33:00 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Iamsemisweet

Not at all.
quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead




Pro nuclear environmentalist????????
Isn't that a contradiction of terms?





A protocol has been discovered that will allow the safe storage of spent fuel? May I have a link?

(in reply to Iamsemisweet)
Profile   Post #: 66
RE: The Environmental Crucifixion Agency - 5/3/2012 10:36:59 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

It was my understanding that a lot of American environmentalists were pro nuclear. Not the Sierra Club or the monkeywrenchers, but those with a bit more of a clue about engineering.



Pro nuclear environmentalist????????
Isn't that a contradiction of terms?

Nope.
Nuclear power plants put out a lot less pollutants than the ones that burn fossil fuels and don't contribute to global warmingAl Gore's unAmerican conspiracy theory at all.



You neglected to include the spent fuel rods in your calculation of pollutants. Until they can be safely stored "nuclear environmentalist" will continue to be a contradiction in terms.

(in reply to Moonhead)
Profile   Post #: 67
RE: The Environmental Crucifixion Agency - 5/3/2012 12:59:33 PM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline 		They can be stored safely now.
The problem is that "safely" and "on the cheap" aren't synonyms.

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 68
RE: The Environmental Crucifixion Agency - 5/3/2012 1:34:39 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

It was my understanding that a lot of American environmentalists were pro nuclear. Not the Sierra Club or the monkeywrenchers, but those with a bit more of a clue about engineering.

I'm an environmentalist and I'm at least vaguely pro nukes. I think we should heavily regulate and inspect the operators but I'm in favor of building at least a few new nuclear power plants.

(in reply to Moonhead)
Profile   Post #: 69
RE: The Environmental Crucifixion Agency - 5/3/2012 1:35:44 PM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline 		Don't tell me, tell thompsonx...


_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 70
RE: The Environmental Crucifixion Agency - 5/3/2012 1:36:53 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

Don't tell me, tell thompsonx...


why bother?

(in reply to Moonhead)
Profile   Post #: 71
RE: The Environmental Crucifixion Agency - 5/3/2012 4:09:49 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

They can be stored safely now.
The problem is that "safely" and "on the cheap" aren't synonyms.



May I have a link to the site that validates that?

(in reply to Moonhead)
Profile   Post #: 72
RE: The Environmental Crucifixion Agency - 5/3/2012 4:17:39 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

It was my understanding that a lot of American environmentalists were pro nuclear. Not the Sierra Club or the monkeywrenchers, but those with a bit more of a clue about engineering.

I'm an environmentalist and I'm at least vaguely pro nukes. I think we should heavily regulate and inspect the operators but I'm in favor of building at least a few new nuclear power plants.


Perhaps you could tell us who has more nuclear power plants than anyone on the planet.

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 73
RE: The Environmental Crucifixion Agency - 5/3/2012 5:18:08 PM   
kalikshama


Posts: 14805
Joined: 8/8/2010
Status: offline 		What about acts of sabotage more calamitous than Stuxnet?

I'm all for nuclear power after all safety issues such as tsunami/hurricane/tornado/spent fuel rods are solved. Otherwise, the risks are too great.


(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 74
RE: The Environmental Crucifixion Agency - 5/3/2012 6:19:28 PM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

Don't tell me, tell thompsonx...


why bother?



See that, there are some things we can agree on.

_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 75
RE: The Environmental Crucifixion Agency - 5/4/2012 4:43:23 AM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

They can be stored safely now.
The problem is that "safely" and "on the cheap" aren't synonyms.



May I have a link to the site that validates that?

There's more than just the one site, dear.

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 76
RE: The Environmental Crucifixion Agency - 5/4/2012 5:18:00 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

They can be stored safely now.
The problem is that "safely" and "on the cheap" aren't synonyms.



May I have a link to the site that validates that?

There's more than just the one site, dear.



May we have a link to those sites that validate your opinion?

(in reply to Moonhead)
Profile   Post #: 77
RE: The Environmental Crucifixion Agency - 5/4/2012 5:20:30 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: kalikshama

What about acts of sabotage more calamitous than Stuxnet?

I'm all for nuclear power after all safety issues such as tsunami/hurricane/tornado/spent fuel rods are solved. Otherwise, the risks are too great.





Here is a different approach to nuclear power.

http://cr4.globalspec.com/blogentry/19770/THORium-to-the-Rescue

(in reply to kalikshama)
Profile   Post #: 78
RE: The Environmental Crucifixion Agency - 5/4/2012 5:23:16 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

Don't tell me, tell thompsonx...


why bother?



See that, there are some things we can agree on.


It would make sense that two people of similar intellectual capacity would agree on this.

(in reply to thishereboi)
Profile   Post #: 79
RE: The Environmental Crucifixion Agency - 5/4/2012 5:38:19 AM   
kalikshama


Posts: 14805
Joined: 8/8/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

They can be stored safely now.


Are you referring to dry cask storage? That's not meant to be a permanent solution - the casks only last for decades, not the millenia needed for the hazardous lifetime of the waste. And their use is not currently mandated in the US.

Anyway, is nuclear power viable without subsidies?







< Message edited by kalikshama -- 5/4/2012 5:40:18 AM >

(in reply to Moonhead)
Profile   Post #: 80
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: The Environmental Crucifixion Agency Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.078